Latest Contributions by EricMcAvoy

This "feature" has been moved to defaults in Chrome 80. If you're experiencing issues, you can do the following: 1. Go into the "Chrome Flags" chrome://flags 2. Search for same 3. Disable "Enable removing SameSite=None cookies" and "Cookies without SameSite must be secure" flags This should get you back up and running until a more complete fix can be suggested. ... View more

I'm not sure where this application of least squares to the entire network idea comes from. First, this makes the assumption that the network is accurate. Second, when did this change of suggestion come about? It runs contrary to ESRI's documentation going back as far as I can find, why would you ever apply a least squares adjustment to an entire network? 9.3: http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?tocVisable=0&ID=6510&TopicName=The%20least%20squares%20adjustment%20process&pid=6501    It is not recommended that you run a least-squares adjustment on data with dimensions that do not match the record of survey. If dimensions do not match the record of survey or plan, you can't tell how inaccurate or accurate the dimensions really are...  10.3: Parcel fabric adjustment best practices—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop     It is not recommended that you run a parcel fabric adjustment on parcels with dimensions that do not match the plan or record of survey. If dimensions do not match the dimensions of the parcel described on its plan, it is impossible to tell how inaccurate or accurate the dimensions really are... ... View more

Yes, you should take a look at Tom Selested's Traverse widget: https://community.esri.com/docs/DOC-9065-traverse-widget-220 ... View more

I'm also having problems with truncate refusing to work regardless of which connection i'm using. ... View more

Hi Tom, I would take a look at the SaveSession Widget. It has this functionality. ... View more

Yeah, it is super weird. Thanks again! ... View more

Robert, It worked!! Thank You So Much! ... View more

Absolutely! Thanks for looking into this Robert. ... View more

sorry, that should have read eSearch 2.4 with WAB 2.4 ... View more

Robert, I have compared the names of the fields to an archived version and they all still match. I should mention  that this is not an app or dataset specific problem. All of our web apps have experienced this issue with all of their configured eSearch layers. The issue seems to originate in the App, as the query that is sent out is no longer correctly constructing. The OTB search bar is still functioning correctly. I have attempted to build test applications in WAB 2.5 and 2.4, using fresh services and the issue persists. ... View more

Robert, I haven't made any changes to the app since early July and the data structure has remained unchanged as well. I'm a little baffled here. The only change I've made is updating our server to 10.5.1 ... View more

Hi Tom, I think what Pavel is looking for is the Azmuthal Bearing you included when you built the Traverse tool. I think its this code block here. var bearing; if (this.rdoAz.checked) { // this proves I don't know trig well enough... var r = Math.atan2(pt.y - startPT.y, pt.x - startPT.x) - Math.atan2(startPT.y + 100 - startPT.y, startPT.x - startPT.x); var ang = this.toDegrees(r); if (ang < 0) { ang = Math.abs(ang); } else { ang = 360 - ang; } ... View more

Hi Robert! I'm having a weird issue and I'm hoping you might be able to help me out. We've been using the eSearch for more than a year now and it has worked flawlessly the entire time. Our 2.4 Web App is using eSearch Version 2.3. Early last week, the Search by Value ceased working as it had and started returning no results. This search for Survey numbers containing "CS1" should return hundreds of results. The query it sends to the service should be Upper(DocumentNa) LIKE Upper('%cs1%') but instead it is sending the entire query regardless of the entered parameters.  Upper(DocumentNa) LIKE Upper('%cs1%') AND Upper(SurveyorKe) LIKE Upper('%%') AND Upper(Subdivisio) LIKE Upper('%%') AND Upper(ClerkNumbe) LIKE Upper('%%') The issue exists in IE, Firefox, and Chrome versions 59 and 60. No errors show in the DEV Console.  Any guidance you might have would be highly appreciated. Thanks! ... View more