POST
|
Hi @NanaDei I believe the original poster @Bud of the other suggested (and I agree) in his original post that custom attribute rules are not the preferred solution. If we had to enforce domains with a custom attribute rule for each table in our 400+ layer data model, that would likely be unwieldy/unmanageable. When as both ideas state: "I’m aware similar functionality can be achieved via customization using attribute rules or database triggers. But we shouldn't need to write custom code to enforce a pick list. Most enterprise systems have hard domains built in as a way of enforcing basic data integrity. For example, in IBM Maximo, the entire system honors domains by default — including back-end Python scripts. As a result, data integrity is rock solid, making data analysis easy." Do you see another mechanism Esri can pursue to force domain values be respected as one would expect, as requested by this poster as well?
... View more
04-17-2024
06:24 PM
|
1
|
0
|
437
|
POST
|
Also seeing this related post about probably the same issue: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/prevent-non-domain-values-from-being-used-across/idi-p/1185679
... View more
04-17-2024
08:22 AM
|
0
|
2
|
448
|
POST
|
This should not happen right @jill_es @NanaDei ? We have the same issue where domain values are set, but data editors can calculate values that do not match the values. Is there a way to really prevent this? We are using PostgreSQl in Azure as our SDE database.
... View more
04-17-2024
08:13 AM
|
0
|
3
|
450
|
IDEA
|
@MarianneFarretta Which version of Enterprise will this be implemented in?
... View more
03-11-2024
10:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
652
|
POST
|
@ChristopherPawlyszyn We hit the same issue with 11.1, is there a new version we can get for 11.1 or can we pull it from an 11.2 install?
... View more
03-08-2024
10:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
800
|
POST
|
We are doing the same thing as @RhettZufelt , and get some interesting issues, have lots of retries built in to get it to work. Will ping colleagues to post some help as we figure things out.
... View more
02-21-2024
01:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
319
|
BLOG
|
And interested in a roadmap for more seemless options in the future for ArcGIS Enterprise @jill_es .
... View more
02-19-2024
10:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1424
|
BLOG
|
Would be interested in a meetup with @JSchroeder to discuss how best to bridge the gap (syncing options) between referenced layers in eGDB and hosted layers in ArcGIS Enterprise that many apps like Survey 123 work with.
... View more
02-19-2024
10:04 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1425
|
POST
|
Thanks @ThomasEdghill , we upgraded to 11.1 and no longer see the PulishingToolsEx service at all from any endpoint. Want to make sure this is right, and we did not have an issue with the upgrade. Can you confirm publishingtoolsEX (And all Ex services) are no longer in either mananger or rest admin. We are assuming this is the case since your previous statement kind of alluded to that might be the direction in the future.
... View more
01-29-2024
08:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
579
|
POST
|
@Bobba , we are in a similar boat, did you find a solution?
... View more
01-09-2024
08:27 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1229
|
POST
|
Did you add to the ideas board? I will upvote there if so.
... View more
10-11-2023
01:51 PM
|
0
|
0
|
294
|
POST
|
We are also finding this to be true using Built-in Admins, is this by design as well?
... View more
05-17-2023
08:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1554
|
IDEA
|
@stevecater1 I believe that sounds like a complementary option that I agree could be added here. @ThomasEdghill , @CarolineWright do you think this can get into Product Plan?
... View more
04-28-2023
12:11 PM
|
0
|
0
|
774
|
IDEA
|
Thanks for the OP. I also submitted kudos for this and would for @PaulHoefflerGISS inputs and @JamesTchorzynski1's inputs. BTW, Esri should have a better name for these groups, we call them "Shared Contributor" groups internally and vote for that.
... View more
04-20-2023
03:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
253
|
IDEA
|
Thanks for the input JCarlson. I would have to argue that Esri is mis-marketing Survey123 then as the marketing materials https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-survey123/overview seem to indicate that a non-gis person would be able to enter data, and that editor and fieldworker types (who would typically have more training (and be more likely geared towards ArcGIS Fieldmaps) would not be required. "In any environment and with minimal training, use the Survey123 web app and mobile app to record survey answers" and "Flexible for various scenarios: When a project must start quickly, create a survey rapidly to start collecting data." I think esri could easily expand the Viewer role to allow for survey submittals from Viewers in Private ArcGIS Enterprise Portal Surveys that are shared to the organization. Viewers can already do it if the portal allows anonymous access. Other licenses require additional justification and training - with more power comes more responsibility.
... View more
04-20-2023
03:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
511
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 04-17-2024 06:24 PM | |
1 | 02-19-2024 10:04 AM | |
1 | 02-19-2024 10:05 AM | |
10 | 04-13-2023 10:49 AM | |
1 | 12-11-2018 10:25 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|