Latest Contributions by BjornSvensson

Thanks Shakil Choudhury‌ for the suggestion.  In the next release (4.10), the Expand widget will be smarter about this and there won't be tabbing inside a closed Expand widget. ... View more

Nicolas Guilhaudin  Sorry, this will not be fixed in 4.10.  I don't think there's a NIM for it. ... View more

What does the data look like? Does the data have attributes with that information?  For example, could you just display features where the attributes end in "0m" and "5m"? ... View more

Daniele Sampietro‌ - yes, this sounds like a bug.  Longer term we plan to add arrowheads to the 4.x API (which 3x API already supports). In the meantime, could you share a simple repro case?  Maybe using codepen or jsbin... ... View more

moslem ansar‌, could you provide more details?  Does it work for all layers except featurelayes? Does it not work for any featurelayers?  Try for example some feature layers used in the samples. What does your code look like? ... View more

Andrew, HeatMap support was added in version 4.8 (July). https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-renderers-HeatmapRenderer.html https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/sample-code/visualization-heatmap/index.html ... View more

I also answered the same on your stackexchange question feature layer - Heatmap not working on FeatureLayer (ArcGIS JS API 4.8) - Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange  ... View more

This isn't supported at 4.8.  The "Known limitation" doc for FeatureLayer WebGL is a bit unclear but when it says "Non-hosted enterprise feature services will be supported at the ArcGIS Server 10.6.1 release." it really means "only feature layers created from feature services (not from map services)". Not sure why the point service works... This limitation will go away at 4.9. https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-layers-FeatureLayer.html#webgl-rendering  ... View more

Robert/James, does either one of you happen to have a public layer that it fails with? For the 10.6.1 layer that it fails with, does it also fail when used in a webmap? ... View more

Then you don't need to do any of this... When your organization opts in to vector, that only means replace those raster that have vector equivalents. It doesn't drop world imagery etc to make it vector-only. ... View more

There's no option for ad-hoc adding, but if you don't like using a group (PortalBasemapsSource), you could also create the list on the client using LocalBasemapsSource. You would then add both raster and vector basemaps. One benefit of the PortalBasemapsSource option is that it gives you an easy way of controlling the set of basemaps using the "group" without having to update your actual application code. As a side note, if you add both raster and vector basemap for users to pick between with, they might get confused since the basemap names are the same. The vector basemaps are supposed to be used instead of (not together with) the raster basemaps.  Out of curiosity, what's your specific need for showing users both raster and vectors? /Bjorn ... View more