|
IDEA
|
I'd like to recommend that the ArcGIS Pro Layer to KML tool have the same behavior as the ArcMap Layer to KML in regards to how domain descriptions are maintained. ArcGIS Pro is not maintaining the domain descriptions, while ArcMap does. This makes ArcMap preferable when exporting KML. This is an everyday task for a lot of people so a fix would be very desirable since we really want to migrate to Pro. This type of issues would prevent me from being able to recommend that people use it. Has anyone else seen this where ArcGIS Pro domain descriptions are not included in the KML output? The documentation does explain how using the Environment Variables and Conversion Table to Table tool will add the descriptions by appending the fields with d_ and populating with the description. That is not going to work for me because my fields names are very confusing and I rely on the alias. Retrieving the alias and deleting the old fields before converting KML seems unnecessary since it works in ArcMap out of the box. The situation is that exporting to KML using the domain descriptions without modifying the schema is possible in ArcMap but not ArcGIS Pro.
... View more
08-21-2019
11:16 AM
|
8
|
6
|
3452
|
|
POST
|
Okay thanks for the response... I was able to get a prototype flow together to grab photos an put into a template by following the steps in your flow. I was surprised how relatively user friendly Flow is. I think I will start incorporating it into more of my projects.
... View more
08-15-2019
06:11 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1635
|
|
POST
|
Hi James, Today I am going to try a recreate your Flow to use attachments from a Survey. We had issues with the Survey 123 Connector but we want to use Flow for handling event escalation and email notification from filtered surveys. Do you know if there has been any progress on the MS Flow and Survey 123 issues in the past few months?
... View more
08-12-2019
08:06 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2855
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I've been developing with python for several years and don't recall having this issue before. When I set breakpoints at the PointsToLine_management function call, the debugger stops. When I click run, it continues all the way through the script without stopping on any other breakpoints. I am able to step through the arcpy function line by line, but stepping out or over does not return me to my script and hit the next breakpoint. It seems that the debugger context is not getting set back after returning from the arcpy function call. I am using Visual Studio Code so that could be the source of the problem. Is anyone also using VS Code to write/debug python? Thanks!
... View more
03-15-2019
12:17 PM
|
0
|
6
|
2320
|
|
POST
|
Hi Paul, I've changed jobs/companies and am not working with the Utility Network currently. If I get back to that I will post example issues. Thanks!
... View more
03-15-2019
11:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1269
|
|
POST
|
Hi Daniel, I have changed jobs/companies and am not working with this issue anymore. If I get back onto the SAML and ADFS road I will post again. Thanks!
... View more
03-15-2019
11:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3338
|
|
POST
|
Hi Biraja, I've since changed companies/jobs and am not working with SQL Server Express anymore. I am unable to provide an example.
... View more
03-15-2019
11:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
554
|
|
POST
|
The Utility Network Package Tools have an export Asset Package GP Tool that is supposed to be used to load data into the enterprise GDB. When adding data to this FGDB asset package, the GlobalIDs all appear as {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}. When applying this asset package to the enterpriseGDB it fails because of an invalid GlobalID. Does the data have to be appended to the enterpriseGDB first to get a GlobalID? If the Asset Package is being used to load data, should the GlobalID field exist in it if it is unable to create them? It seems like a bug somewhere either in the database or the GP Tool that is not enabled GlobalIDs correctly.
... View more
12-11-2018
01:00 PM
|
2
|
1
|
1661
|
|
POST
|
Hi Dan, True, that is where I've downloaded the current version of the extension. So Esri will update that download link and possibly notify users to download the update? I really like how ArcServer has the updates program to notify and install updates. I wonder if ArcPro could so the same for its extensions? It is not a really critical issue and is definitely not holding us up on anything at the moment, but if new features are added to FME desktop, how long does it typically take to make its way into the Data Interop for ArcPro? I was reading that FME Desktop workbench .fmw files can be loaded as GP Tools and executed using the x64 platform. That is really powerful. Does that mean that brand new FME features can be run in ArcPro without Data Interop by first authoring in FME Desktop? Thanks!
... View more
11-15-2018
06:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
834
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I had a question from a coworker who uses FME Desktop regularly as well as ArcPro and ArcMap. The question is this. Does the Data Interoperability extension for ArcGIS Pro get updates periodically to stay relatively close to the FME updates? My thought is that since it is an additional install that it would not be included in the regular ArcPro updates and patches, and I don't think I've seen updates released for the extension in ArcMap or ArcPro. Thanks!
... View more
11-15-2018
05:59 AM
|
0
|
4
|
958
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jay, That did it! How can I ever thank you? Have a wonderful Thanksgiving!! Rich
... View more
11-12-2018
04:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
832
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I am in the process of configuring Data Reviewer for Server to share a data QC review. The reviewer service is not starting and I am going to be walking through the information I have and maybe someone can help? In the below image, should the extensions say 10.6.1 and not 10.6? I did an in-place upgrade of the server from 10.6 to 10.6.1 and uninstalled all extensions before installing 10.6.1. The DRS configuration utility completes, but the reviewer map service does not start. When attempting to start through the Server manager I receive the following error. The Reviewer workspace exists in SQL Server on the same machine as the GIS Server. The folder containing the sde connection file does grant the GIS Server Account with read/write access. I've even added the ArcGIS Server account to the SQL Database with data read and data write. Anyone know what could be causing the issue?
... View more
11-12-2018
01:37 PM
|
0
|
2
|
935
|
|
POST
|
Update -- When exporting the Asset Package from the enterprise GDB, the rules tables were again visible in the file geodatabase. So is it correct that the rule tables should not be visible in the Utility Network when connected as the dataowner who owns the schema that utility network was created with? I did use the sde schema to enable the enterpriseGDB, and the dataowner has privileges on the sde schema. The database is in PostgreSQL on AWS. When exporting the Asset Package I did receive this warning. The B_DatabaseSequence table was added at version 2.2.0. I am thinking that since the database is not versioned yet that this table is not being used. Should I be concerned about this warning? My next step is to load my data into the exported Asset Package. Thanks!
... View more
11-08-2018
05:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1269
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I've downloaded the stormwater solution Asset Package, Changed the Spatial Reference (which creates an empty Asset Package), and Applied that Asset Package to the Staged Utility Network. After the operation completes, none of the A_, B_, C_ rules tables were created. Did this happen because the Asset Package was empty, or is there a more serious issue that I need to address to have these rule tables applied from the Asset Package? The above image is a screenshot of the Utility Network after applying the Stormwater Solutions Asset Package made empty by running the Change Asset Package Spatial Reference Tool. The rule tables were not created 😕 Thanks!
... View more
11-07-2018
08:48 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1494
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I do work with Aviation clients and my manager said he heard that there was an 18b symbology within the ArcGIS for Aviation extension. Based on my research into the product/extensions and GP Tools, I don't think that there is one. Can anyone confirm this?
... View more
11-05-2018
06:00 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1013
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-30-2020 05:48 AM | |
| 1 | 07-24-2020 06:10 AM | |
| 1 | 03-24-2020 10:04 AM | |
| 1 | 01-11-2022 05:32 AM | |
| 1 | 10-04-2021 06:14 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
08-05-2022
08:48 AM
|