|
IDEA
|
Can Esri implement this in MS Flow? Is this something that Esri has control over, or Microsoft, or is it a mutual thing? I know this works nicely in Integromat (SeeAdding Survey123 Feature Report as Output File to Integromat Workflow, however many organizations (mine included) have already bought into the Microsoft ecosystem. With security restrictions what they are these days, it's very hard to get an approval to use yet another cloud service, particularly since there's a lot of overlap between the two.
... View more
02-06-2020
07:55 AM
|
33
|
6
|
3705
|
|
POST
|
I know this works nicely in Integromat (See Adding Survey123 Feature Report as Output File to Integromat Workflow, however many organizations (mine included) have already bought into the Microsoft ecosystem. With security restrictions what they are these days, it's very hard to get an approval to use yet another cloud service, particularly since there's a lot of overlap between the two. Are there plans to implement this in Flow? Is this something that Esri has control over, or Microsoft, or is it a mutual thing? There was some discussion in the Integromat thread, but I figure the topic is worthy of its own thread. Tagging James Tedrick since he made mention of this in the other thread.
... View more
02-03-2020
04:44 PM
|
2
|
2
|
1291
|
|
POST
|
This is promising, thanks. Unfortunately my org doesn't have the premium features available.
... View more
02-03-2020
04:34 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3220
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Mark, Any updates you provide would be helpful. I think that many people (myself included) will be happy to see this functionality make it to Collector and Explorer. Thanks, Rob
... View more
01-27-2020
08:19 AM
|
2
|
0
|
3882
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be helpful to sort repeat records in reports. Example use case: Inspectors log a timeline of events in repeats. Each repeat record also records date/time. If revisions are made to add an event that was missed, the feature report has no way to show the events chronologically. Example: 07:00 AM: Construction crew arrives on site 07:45 AM: Construction crew begins excavation work 04:00 PM: Crew leaves for the day 12:00 PM: Crew breaks for lunch (added as part of revision) 12:30 PM: Crew resumes work (added as part of revision)
... View more
01-24-2020
10:27 AM
|
17
|
5
|
2825
|
|
POST
|
Hi Mark Bockenhauer, did this make it into the 100.7 runtime release? If so, any ideas on how long this will take to make it to Collector?
... View more
01-23-2020
05:51 PM
|
1
|
2
|
3882
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Xander. I was hoping the join could do it for simplicity, but Arcade would work. The join in this case is 1:1. Do you have any example scripts for updating using FeatureSet?
... View more
01-07-2020
11:43 AM
|
0
|
2
|
3091
|
|
POST
|
I have 2 hosted feature services, a "production" HFS and an "updated" HFS. The production data was published from Pro, the updated data was published as a HFS from a zipped GDB upload. I've created the join in AGOL based on a common ID, and saved the join as an HFS view. I want to update attributes in the production data from values in the update table. The underlying production HFS is editable. Seems like this should all be doable, but I get errors with SQL or Arcade.
... View more
01-07-2020
09:01 AM
|
0
|
4
|
3157
|
|
IDEA
|
File this under "too obvious for my brain". If you're ever in NJ I owe you a beer.
... View more
12-17-2019
11:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5475
|
|
IDEA
|
The new sharing process is nice, but it's not very user friendly for someone who owns and manages a lot of groups. See screen shots, I would like to see these things improved. Particularly, a way to quickly see a list of groups an item is shared with. Showing the icons is not helpful to anyone who maintains many groups (I maintain 38, I'm sure many people have more).
... View more
12-11-2019
04:41 AM
|
3
|
1
|
701
|
|
POST
|
Looking forward to hearing the resolution of this, since it will also impact essentially every production survey that I've authored. I do not believe this is the intended behavior? James Tedrick 3.7.x is still in beta, correct?
... View more
11-14-2019
05:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3901
|
|
POST
|
When you go to a Hosted Feature Service's Settings (Overview) page, you have the option to "Create View Layer". I'm familiar with the concept and I understand what's going on here. However, on the Visualization tab you also have the option to "Save As New Layer". What is the difference between doing this (aside from the option to save a single layer?) and creating a view? Based on Create hosted feature layer views—ArcGIS Online Help | Documentation I'm taking a guess that you have more granular control over a HFS View as compared to the New Layer option. Am I missing anything else? The description in "My Content" is different also.
... View more
11-09-2019
05:38 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1722
|
|
BLOG
|
Marika Vertzonis I'm also interested in a Trimble R1 status update. Please let us know if there has been any progress.
... View more
10-29-2019
06:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31033
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 3 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 03-20-2026 04:14 AM | |
| 1 | 07-01-2025 05:11 AM | |
| 1 | 06-13-2022 11:18 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|