Latest Contributions by NeilAyres

Well, personally, I would get the geo-referencing stuff sorted first so you can really see where they are in the world then sort the other stuff out after. After georeferencing (using the toolbar), you can rectify and specify an output cell size and if you use the environments setting you should be able to specify the extent boundaries to align it nicely to your projected grid. Then repeat. ... View more

This is the ArcGIS basemap hosted with AGOL. Not sure what the actual URL is. ... View more

I see that the Create Version tool need access to a connection file, which will of course identify the user. If you had a collection of these you could script it. ... View more

Yep, that's the way. When the man is there it works just fine.... ... View more

There is a Create Version tool in the toolbox, therefore it can be scripted in python. I have no idea how actual users are handled though. ... View more

There is an OSM basemap. ... View more

"But each feature with same attributes stored in different lines, I can't get them all." Not sure what you mean here. If you have managed to get at the extended data objects, what else do you need to do? Merge them back together again? ... View more

At first I thought that this must be the result of some XY tolerance problem. But then I copied your "before cut" layer, and did the cut again. But I don't get the shift or the resulting nasty sliver. Everything looks as it should. But I am editing into your fgdb, not SDE. Perhaps there's something else going on. Try your side with the data as is now, ie in an fgdb. ... View more

I have seen this done before, but, unfortunately, it was hand crafted. The legend was converted to a graphic and then edited from there. Much like what you have done in your image. What you could try is to create another column in your data and concatenate the number and the description together. Then use that for the legend. This, of course, will not put the number on top of the patch, but you will have both the number and the description next to the patch. ... View more

Actually, that's not a simple problem. See attached pdf for one example. If its just a once off, hand digitizing through the "middle" of your existing data might be the way to go. ... View more

Firstly, the attached lyr files are not very useful in looking at you data because they do not contain any data, simply symbology and pointing at data on your local machine (c:/...../CADD.gdb). I did look at the CAD file however. It contains only polylines and some annotation. There are no polygons to validate. If this is how your data arrives, you may want to look at the Data Interop extension (FME) to translate the polylines to polygons. ... View more

Recently completed a tool to update / insert into a Network Dataset. I can confirm that you need a edit session open. ... View more

I went to your link above and downloaded the lyr file and had a look in ArcGIS (v10.3.1). Loaded the lyr file first into a new map doc, then loaded the topo basemap (WGS84 based). I note that I did not get the usual warning about different datums and the need to apply a transformation. Although when I look at the properties, it does indeed know that it is JTSK based. So, something is not quite getting through here. I know that the online services are supposed to handle the transformations correctly, I do not think that esri have got this quite right yet. In our experience, we have created WGS84 based data from the local datum based data, then published that to avoid potential confusion. Might not be the answer you want to hear but you may have to reconsider your workflow. The shift is obvious from this snapshot. No transformation applied. ... View more

Well, that post was in answer to another question from a user here. About distances between street poles or something. If you want further guidance, I think you should be a little more specific about your data, its attributes and exactly what you want to achieve. ... View more

Yes, the underlying small polygon is summed into both of the larger overlapping areas. Which is just what you want in this analysis. ... View more