|
POST
|
Did this machine have a previous version of Pro (eg 2.2) installed? Can you post a screenshot of the python backstage?
... View more
05-31-2019
09:17 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5016
|
|
POST
|
What version of untools do you have installed? You can check by running the following from Python window: import untools print(untools.__version__) Do you see the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox?
... View more
05-21-2019
12:23 PM
|
1
|
3
|
5016
|
|
POST
|
This will be resolved in untools 2.3.3, which is currently slotted for a release next week. If you need a fix sooner, you can email the asset package to pleblanc@esri.com (or I can show you how to install the untools release candidate).
... View more
05-15-2019
03:32 PM
|
0
|
4
|
5817
|
|
POST
|
Do you have a service running (ie, have you published your UN)? If not, then you should reach out to support. I've not heard of disable requiring multiple executions before it succeeds.
... View more
05-09-2019
03:57 PM
|
1
|
3
|
4877
|
|
POST
|
If you restart Pro, does the topology still show as disabled? I see the UN was created with Pro 2.2 -- have you since upgraded to Pro 2.3?
... View more
05-09-2019
09:24 AM
|
3
|
5
|
4877
|
|
POST
|
I have a RC version of untools that has a fix for this and a few other issues. You can install it from a python command prompt. Note, any installs from this channel are beta development versions so therefore not supported. conda install -c solutionsdev/label/pro2.3 untools This will install 2.3.2.X Assuming all goes well, there is plans for a public 2.3.3 release of untools before June.
... View more
05-02-2019
04:50 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2895
|
|
POST
|
There's a bug with using GCS. You only run into it when `Load data` is checked in untools 2.3.2. 2.3.1 does not have this issue.
... View more
04-29-2019
08:16 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2895
|
|
POST
|
As long as you are not loading data*, you can apply the asset package multiple times to the same UN and only the differences will be applied. You can get into odd scenarios though if you modify both the UN and asset package and then attempt to apply the asset package again. You are correct though, if you make a non-additive change to the asset package, applying can fail since it is in conflict with the UN. * loading data is not additive, so you'll get GlobalID collisions.
... View more
04-24-2019
05:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1774
|
|
POST
|
You're the first person to ask about this At time of writing, there are 172 unique errors that are checked in untools, which would be a lot of GeoNet posts... Long term, I'd like for the error message in the GP tool to hyperlink out to a webpage explaining the error. Short term though, we will investigate creating a reference webpage explaining these errors. Thanks for the suggestion!
... View more
04-24-2019
04:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1993
|
|
POST
|
Anytime you get the "The asset package has the following errors:" message, that means there is something incompatible in the asset package and so execution is halted. For this particular error, you are sharing the same asset type domain between the StructureJunction and StructureLine classes, which is not allowed. This error only checks asset type, so you can freely share other domains as much as you want. As for why this is blocked, it's because you can modify a domain and it unintentionally has an impact on other asset types.
... View more
04-24-2019
07:52 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1993
|
|
POST
|
The easiest way to get a "vanilla" asset package is create a new UN (maybe add a domain network), and then export that to an asset package.
... View more
04-23-2019
09:16 AM
|
1
|
1
|
5817
|
|
POST
|
Here's some of the errors on the UN feature classes: SCHEMA_FEATURE_CLASS_ASSETGROUP = Error("Domain network class must have field 'AssetGroup'", 14)
SCHEMA_FEATURE_CLASS_ASSETGROUP_LONG = Error("Field 'AssetGroup' must be of type 'Long'", 15)
SCHEMA_FEATURE_CLASS_ASSETTYPE = Error("Domain network class must have field 'AssetType'", 16)
SCHEMA_FEATURE_CLASS_ASSETTYPE_SHORT = Error("Field 'AssetType' must be of type 'Short'", 17)
SCHEMA_FEATURE_CLASS_SUBTYPES = Error("Domain network class must have 'AssetGroup' as the subtype field", 18) The error message you are receiving looks to be a bug since it isn't reporting the table or field name. Can you share the asset package?
... View more
04-23-2019
09:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5817
|
|
POST
|
These are system maintained fields, so don't modify the domains assigned to them. Even if you could modify them, apply asset package would ignore it since they are recreated by the system. The naming convention is <UN Name>_<UN DSID>_<domain name>
... View more
04-23-2019
09:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1219
|
|
POST
|
Attribute rules (and database sequences) are not currently supported on file geodatabase so they are stored in tables. If a future release of Pro adds support to FGDB, these tables will become deprecated.
... View more
04-23-2019
09:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1844
|
|
POST
|
B_DatabaseSequence—Asset Package Reference | ArcGIS Solutions These values are passed directly to Create Database Sequence—Data Management toolbox | ArcGIS Desktop You can alter them, but then you'd need to find all the attribute rules that reference them and also change them there. Unless you are looking inside the database (eg via SQL Studio), you cannot even see these names. As such, I would not recommend you modify them. There's no hardcoding in untools for database sequences. As long as whatever you put there is a valid sequence name, it will get created in your enterprise geodatabase.
... View more
04-22-2019
04:39 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1844
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12-17-2024 02:14 PM | |
| 1 | 09-07-2024 09:04 AM | |
| 1 | 07-23-2024 09:26 AM | |
| 3 | 06-27-2024 03:27 PM | |
| 1 | 06-07-2024 01:49 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-13-2026
06:34 AM
|