|
BLOG
|
Hi All For all users of this workflow you should look into using Data Expressions to combine multiple features into one feature set and include a separate field called "form ID"(include the item ID of the survey in the value ) into your dictionary to be added to the feature set. This way you can link the formID field into your embedded content url which allows you to use multiple forms in the same dashboard. See sample below. Its a very useful tool for us. var combinedDict = {
fields: [
{ name: "CreatedDate", type: "esriFieldTypeDate"},
{ name: "FORMID", type: "esriFieldTypeString" },
{ name: "globalid", type: "esriFieldTypeString" },
{ name: "Parentglobalid", type: "esriFieldTypeString" },
{ name: "Review_Status", type: "esriFieldTypeString" },
{ name: "Review_Comments", type: "esriFieldTypeString" }
],
geometryType: "",
features: [],
};
var i = 0;
for (var m in Feature) {
var start = ToLocal(Date(1970, 0, 01, 0, 0, 0, 0))
var dtMDN = DateDiff(m.CreationDate, start, 'milliseconds')
combinedDict.features[i] = {
attributes: {
Del_Area: "MDN",
CreatedDate: dtMDN,
Crew: m.Crew_DD,
FORMID: "Insert form ID here for each layer",
globalid: m.globalid,
Parentglobalid: m.parentglobalid
},
};
i++;
}
... View more
05-27-2021
02:50 AM
|
2
|
0
|
31662
|
|
POST
|
Yes we have a good few scenarios running on paid subscription and as i say its normally very reliable however the ones that are missed do cause headaches for users and confusion at times. Would be good to figure out if there is a specific reason.
... View more
03-17-2021
10:43 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4114
|
|
POST
|
@Andrew-Bowne wrote: Have you checked the History of the Scenario to see if it was received but maybe errored? Or, maybe they will show in "Incomplete Executions"? Secondly, is it possible that the scenario was not turned on? Hi @Andrew-Bowne Thanks, but no it's not as simple as that I wish. This is definitely missing executions with no history on integromat , on forms with Webhooks that have successfully submitted. Regards
... View more
03-17-2021
08:52 AM
|
0
|
3
|
4120
|
|
POST
|
We use survey123 and integromat extensively and it seems generally very reliable however recently I have users mention they have a small percentage of forms submitted, with a webhook attached , but no record of it on integromat. The record is successfully submitted to Survey123 but it did not trigger in integromat. I am unsure as to who I should raise a support ticket with. I note the comment above about multiple submissions in a short period of time. I think this could be a similar pattern but not able to reproduce it consistently. @Anonymous User
... View more
03-16-2021
01:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2098
|
|
POST
|
We use survey123 and integromat extensively and it seems generally very reliable however recently I have users mention they have a small percentage of forms submitted, with a webhook attached , but no record of it on integromat. The record is successfully submitted to Survey123 but it did not trigger in integromat. I am unsure as to who I should raise a support ticket with. Is it more likely to be an integromat issue or survey123?
... View more
03-16-2021
01:49 PM
|
1
|
31
|
11714
|
|
POST
|
@YuliaMamonova Did you look at the advanced settings on your trigger module . There is a setting that allows you to specify submissions be processed individually. Would this help your situation.?
... View more
03-16-2021
01:19 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1148
|
|
POST
|
@UTAHOGM_GIS You need to use an iterator on the repeat. The repeat is basically an array of items, when you use an iterator and specify the repeat section of your form as the value it will allow you to map the fields in the repeat further along on your scenario and it will run for each repeat
... View more
03-16-2021
01:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4017
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be useful if attachments could be named via the form similar to survey123. Also to add to this it would be good if attachments could be viewed but not deleted
... View more
03-10-2021
02:47 PM
|
94
|
14
|
5311
|
|
POST
|
Hi @PatrickHassett Sorry I cant definitively comment on launching surveys from a specific portal but the documentation does reference the following structure @arcgis-survey123://?portalUrl=host.domain.com/webadaptor @JamesTedrick would probably have more helpful advice then me on this one I would think.
... View more
03-09-2021
12:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2665
|
|
POST
|
Hi @PatrickHassett When you append it are you using the right parameter format (token=xxx)?
... View more
02-22-2021
12:00 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2705
|
|
POST
|
Hi @PatrickHassett How are you generating your token ? Can you elaborate on your process a bit more?
... View more
02-13-2021
02:24 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2729
|
|
POST
|
What device are you using? Would it have a lot of RAM ?
... View more
01-27-2021
01:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4859
|
|
POST
|
Have you been able to reproduce the issue consistently @JasonJordan00 . The feature layer I have crashes everytime? I have raised it with support too so hopefully the bug can be identified .
... View more
01-27-2021
12:50 PM
|
0
|
2
|
4880
|
|
POST
|
Field maps is consistently crashing on android devices when a particular feature layer is selected. Same map and feature service works fine on collector . Arcade expressions are present on the layer using featuresets. Logging report returns Feature tiling disabled (with timestamp of crash)
... View more
01-27-2021
12:39 PM
|
2
|
12
|
6063
|
|
POST
|
HI @JamesTedrick Thanks for your response , i started again from scratch and I realized I had a a few issues with my relationship json and also not sure if it had an effect but I had no objectidfield in my layer so I added that too. i am no longer getting the error above However the form is now throwing up this error which appears o be related to the attachment layer on the feature service invalid object name user_xxxxx.service xxxxxxxxxxx_ATTACH the xxxx's being the refence to the attachment layer. Do you know what this relates to? regards Paul
... View more
01-14-2021
02:20 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2254
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-27-2025 09:54 AM | |
| 2 | 08-27-2025 09:46 AM | |
| 11 | 05-06-2025 03:32 AM | |
| 1 | 03-30-2022 03:21 AM | |
| 1 | 05-03-2022 03:29 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
19 hours ago
|