POST
|
Jonathan, I did have the security patch installed which was out on the 6th July 2023 and just saw the notice from 2 days ago about the bug. Thanks for the information. Looks like I'm sitting back until it's released. Thanks
... View more
09-21-2023
08:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
709
|
POST
|
Mike, This solved my issue. I had 11 'from' & 16 'to' associations which either or both related features that didn't exist in the domain feature classes. Once removed, I re-ran the enable topology process and it did complete in 22hours on our little AWS SQL Server RDS Thanks again for the information
... View more
09-19-2023
03:24 PM
|
0
|
0
|
324
|
POST
|
Jonathan, I originally did have both portal machines in the ALB target group but the machine with the secondary database kept failing requests so that's the reason I removed it from the target group and asked this question as i thought portal ha ran as active/failover. Now that I have a better understanding of Portal HA, I need to investigate why the second portal machine isn't processing requests, etc.
... View more
09-19-2023
03:12 PM
|
0
|
2
|
737
|
POST
|
Mark, We haven't used any OOTB web tools as they weren't available to us at the time of implementation. Our GP service uses the VersionManagement REST API endpoint associated with the UN Feature Service to do the work relating to reconcile, check for conflicts and posting. The GP service for posting to default is generic as it will handle any branch versioned dataset because the Feature Service url is passed in as a parameter and the VersionManagement endpoint is derived from that, etc.
... View more
09-18-2023
02:18 PM
|
1
|
0
|
251
|
POST
|
Hi there, I have a UNM V3 electric & comms networks on ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.1 + UN Patch 10 with SQL Server 2017 AWS RDS. The electric model needs to be changed to add a new Asset Type for Electric Device. At the moment, I am testing the amount of time it takes to disable & enable topology in a non PRD environment in preparation for a PRD release. Disable topology has worked. Started on the Enable Topology but now getting this Error 160587: Null geometries not allowed after 52hours running. I have ran a bunch of SQL over the database to see what null geoms are present in Default (Branch ID=0) across all 3 domains and haven't found any. The python i'm running is arcpy.un.EnableNetworkTopology(un, 1000000, "ENABLE_TOPO") on an EC2 with ArcGIS Pro 2.9.8 installed on Win Server 2016 Datacentre. There is plenty of disc space free (approx 180Gb). UN properties are UNM 3, ArcGIS Pro release 2.5 & Upgraded is blank. Has anybody come across this error before? Thanks
... View more
09-10-2023
04:12 AM
|
0
|
2
|
457
|
POST
|
Mike, Support Case raised and I have asked our vendor to link it to the bug & escalate. Thanks
... View more
09-07-2023
04:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
487
|
BLOG
|
Hi @NoahMayer Thanks for the information. I can ping both machines healthCheck endpoint and get a {"status":"success"} response returned. Some information relating to your points that I will double check again 1. Portal is running with a local windows account on each machine which has the same name and permissions. We don't really have AD setup in AWS but a little weight version was. This is for FSx file share to host the portal content directory for each machine. A drive is mapped with the credentials to allow machine access to the file share. 2. We followed the portal numbers from Ports used by Portal for ArcGIS—ArcGIS Enterprise | Documentation for ArcGIS Enterprise when setting up the security group for intra-machine comms 3. Are you able to point me in the right direction on how to do this. I did this many moons ago and can't remember where to look. 4. Same as 3 please. 5. I will if the above doesn't pan out. Thanks again for your help on this matter.
... View more
09-07-2023
04:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3074
|
BLOG
|
Hi @rshihab I sure did. We used https://portal-sbx.domain.com/arcgis and we have a Route 53 entry that resolves it to the ALB with a rule to forward to the specified target group which is configured with the static IP address attached to the EC2 instance The other ALB & Route 53 configurations we have are https://hosting-sbx.domain.com/arcgis, https://gp-sbx.domain.com/arcgis, https://un-sbx.domain.com/arcgis & https://map-sbx.domain.com/arcgis server sites. These are federated with Portal and work as expected
... View more
09-07-2023
03:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3079
|
BLOG
|
Noah, I’m a little confused with Portal HA. I have 2 EC2s in AWS with an ALB for portal setup. Followed the steps in https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/administer/windows/configuring-a-highly-available-portal.htm and the status of the machines using portaladmin url is primary/standby. Any request to the alb for portal works if it’s directed to the machine with status of primary. Reading the documentation in the url suggestions traffic is distributed between both machines and in my case it only works on the primary. At the moment, I have the standby up and running but removed from the target group of alb and rules. I must be missing a configuration somewhere. ArcGIS Enterprise 11.1 installed. Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated as I was trying to find out how an alb could ping the statuses of the machines without a token to determine how to route the traffic to only the primary machine. thanks
... View more
09-07-2023
04:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3130
|
POST
|
Hi there, I have an ArcGIS Enterprise 11.1 environment with Portal in HA inside AWS behind an ALB. My ALB routing for Portal is currently set to ONLY go to 1 machine (currently the primary) as defined by the target group in AWS. The reason for this setup is because I can't find a url that doesn't tell me the status of each machine to see who is primary or standby that doesn't require a token. I can't use the healthCheck endpoint as both machines will return {"status": "success"} as they are both functioning correctly. This url requires a token https://<portal alb>/arcgis/portaladmin/machines/<portal machine>?f=pjson to work but gives me the information I need. Has anybody come across this or come up with a workable solution? Thanks
... View more
09-05-2023
05:37 PM
|
0
|
7
|
1212
|
POST
|
Mark, We are in the same boat with a Protected Default. The solution we deployed uses ArcGIS Pro task using a python toolbox. This client-side toolbox collects information from the user & ArcGIS Pro (eg. which service to use (eg. UN), what version to push, whatever else your BAU workflows require). This information is pushed to a GP service which does the actual work. The GP service takes the information as input parameters and processes the request (eg. UN service url, has the version been reconciled in the past 15minutes). The credentials used in the service that has the version management privilege is stored on the server in the Windows Credential Manager and is accessed in python via the profile parameter (eg. gis=GIS(url=UN_url, username=u, password=p, profile=profile). These are setup when the ArcGIS Server software was being installed but can be done at anytime. Access to this service is controlled by an Enterprise Portal group and SSO. The reason we did the GP service was to make it generic as possible in which it could be used with any branch versioned dataset. There are many ways to do this. Good luck.
... View more
09-03-2023
08:14 PM
|
1
|
2
|
331
|
POST
|
Mike, Thanks for this. I need to brush up on my search skills in the support pages as I can't find that. I'm a little disappointed that the bug hasn't been rectified yet. I see that it's in the product plan but how long do we expect the fix to be implemented? The workaround is to use the 'Move' tool but how does an editor move a feature in Z only? Is there a way to escalate this as we consider the edit vertices tool to be key functionality within the application?
... View more
08-30-2023
03:47 PM
|
0
|
2
|
529
|
POST
|
@JohnAlsup @MikeMillerGIS Have you seen this type of issue with UN features before? Thanks
... View more
08-28-2023
07:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
561
|
POST
|
I'm currently testing ArcGIS Pro 2.9.8 and 2.9.10 with Utility Network 3 (Electrical) on ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.1 and have come across an issue that we haven't seen in ArcGIS Pro 2.7.4 before. Our model has an Electric Assembly that can contain Electric Devices via containment association. When an electric assembly's geometry is modified (eg. Z value) all of the associated electric device features that are contained are also moved even with the 'Disconnect' option enabled. There is a before & after image attached. From the after image, see can see all the dirty areas created by the change. The device features are all at the location of the assembly (highlighted feature) and the network is now broken by these moves. Has anybody else noticed this before and maybe know of a solution (eg. wrong option configured) or is this bug? This only occurs with point features that have an association either containment or attachment and can be the same domain or across domains (eg. structure to electric, electric to electric, structure to electric) Thanks for any help with this.
... View more
08-27-2023
07:08 PM
|
1
|
6
|
1071
|
POST
|
Mike, John has a copy of the table and Tom Brown has a copy of our UN PRD SQL Server geodatabase if you're interested in having a look
... View more
08-24-2023
03:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
893
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 03-13-2024 05:43 PM | |
1 | 03-14-2024 02:18 PM | |
1 | 12-13-2023 08:36 PM | |
1 | 11-07-2023 01:55 PM | |
1 | 11-07-2023 12:57 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|