|
POST
|
AGOL feature service webhook not firing Improve ArcGIS Online Feature Service webhook performance
... View more
03-25-2026
09:33 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1458
|
|
POST
|
Here are the options I can think of so far: Control what related feature gets used: It's not documented, but Pro uses the related feature with the smallest OBJECTID for a one-to-one join. So, before doing the spatial join, we could use the Sort GP tool to sort the polygons so that the desired feature has the smallest OBJECTID. Related idea: Spatial Join — "One-to-one (tiebreaker field)" join operation Or, concatenate the polygon IDs into a text field using merge rules. Spatial Join’s hidden trick on how to transfer attribute values in a One to Many relationship Any other options?
... View more
03-25-2026
09:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
312
|
|
DOC
|
What’s new 1.2 says: Templates — Adds the Concourse full-screen page template. What does Concourse mean in this context?
... View more
03-25-2026
08:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
745
|
|
IDEA
|
@NicoleJohnson Any chance you could explain what you mean by the “pending list”?
... View more
03-25-2026
08:26 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1193
|
|
POST
|
When performing a one-to-one spatial join, but the underlying data is one-to-many, such as one point to many polygons: What are our options for handling the multiple polygons in the 1:1 join?
... View more
03-25-2026
10:09 AM
|
0
|
1
|
364
|
|
IDEA
|
It's a shame the Spatial Join docs were never updated.
... View more
03-25-2026
09:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
865
|
|
POST
|
@ValeriaChavez I submitted the following video idea at https://arcg.is/19vOGq1: How to control what related feature is retrieved in a one-to-one spatial join. Hint: if multiple related features are found, Pro grabs the feature with the smallest OBJECTID. That is a very useful technique, but is not well known or well documented. The same might apply to non-spatial 1:1 joins too. Related posts: Spatial Join — "One-to-one (tiebreaker field)" join operation I submitted this documentation feedback for the Spatial Join tool. "When the Join Operation parameter is set to "Join one to one", yet the spatial relationship of the underlying data is one-to-many (i.e. one point intersects multiple overlapping polygons), then the tool will use the related polygon on the many side that has the lowest ObjectID. Please explain that behaviour in the docs so that other people know, and so they can use it to their advantage." https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/analysis/spatial-join.htm It's a shame the Spatial Join docs were never updated. One-to-first join — Control what related record gets used
... View more
03-25-2026
09:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
439
|
|
IDEA
|
Related: Spatial Join’s hidden trick on how to transfer attribute values in a One to Many relationship
... View more
03-25-2026
09:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1141
|
|
DOC
|
Related posts: Ideas: Concatenate Unique values (only) Spatial Join — "One-to-one (tiebreaker field)" join operation One-to-first join — Control what related record gets used Questions: Techniques for 1:1 spatial join where underlying data is 1:M
... View more
03-25-2026
09:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1464
|
|
POST
|
Depending on the question, if you don't get any solutions to your problem, then you could post it as an idea. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-ideas/idb-p/arcgis-experience-builder-ideas
... View more
03-25-2026
06:32 AM
|
4
|
0
|
965
|
|
POST
|
A different contact said this: I'm guessing (keyword) that the webhook is relatively reliable. I'd be more concerned about setting something up that depended on a connection to the outside world without some kind of client side cache in place (e.g. what happens if an event occurs that would trigger a AGO webhook, there isn't any network connection to fire off that event through? Personally, when building mobile (or any disconnected sort of system), I always like to write new data to a local location and have a background thread that runs which polls the data location and sends any required updates to the server system when a connection is available. The background thread's only job is to constantly try to get data from the local storage to the server and no data is removed from the local storage until the successful transfer to the server is acknowledged. That may be overkill, but I don't like losing data.
... View more
03-23-2026
09:48 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1486
|
|
POST
|
@Sarah_Hanson Regarding ArcGIS Data Pipelines in ArcGIS Online and Power Automate: Can an AGOL pipeline call a power automate flow (to send an email)? Or is only the reverse possible: use a power automate flow to run an AGOL pipeline?
... View more
03-21-2026
09:27 PM
|
0
|
1
|
564
|
|
POST
|
Thanks. In summary, no, a Survey123 webhook doesn't need to be set up in both the web form and the field app. It only needs to be set up in the web form.
... View more
03-20-2026
02:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
334
|
|
POST
|
Thanks. I submitted an ArcGIS for Power Automate idea, as you suggested: Integrate ArcGIS Data Pipelines in ArcGIS Enterprise with Microsoft Power Automate
... View more
03-20-2026
02:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
589
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 04-30-2026 11:08 AM | |
| 1 | 05-11-2026 11:23 AM | |
| 2 | 05-07-2026 04:19 AM | |
| 1 | 05-06-2026 09:03 AM | |
| 1 | 03-19-2026 09:29 AM |