Latest Contributions by AnninaRupe1

I have created a hub in Experience Builder that contains several pages. The main ones are a map page and a summary page. On the map page, I have a map with an editable hosted feature layer where we are keeping track of practices that have been implemented on tracts of land. Each record contains a polygon and many attributes, including Practice 1, Practice 2, Practice 3, Practice 4, and Practice 5. The user fills out the record by selecting an implemented practice from a domain list under the "Practice 1" field. If there are multiple practices implemented on the tract, they repeat the process for each subsequent practice in the subsequent practice fields. Each practice field has the exact same domain list. On the summary page, users can see the attribute table of the hosted feature layer. I'm building different filters so the user can summarize fields in the ExB or export the filtered table to CSV for further analysis. They need the capability of filtering by the different practices across all 5 of the practice fields. This can be done in the Filter widget by creating a "Clause Set" and asking for user input, which allows the user to select a value from the list. However, the user has to select the practice 5 times to search all 5 practice fields for one type of practice. I was wondering if there is a way to select the practice once but filter all 5 fields? Here's the filter that works (but is unneccessarily duplicative): I've tried creating a Group Filter but even though I've selected all 5 fields in the "All fields" section, the "Main field" is the only one that's being filtered. Below is an example of what this looks like. I've selected "No-till" from the list, but the only records showing in the filtered list are the ones that have "No-till" in the first practice field (purple lines), not in 2 or 3.    ... View more

I need this capability to move existing data to new versions of my Tool (see my project summary below). The data are all hosted and I think some of the workarounds I tried messed up some of the data, so I have to manually migrate and make sure the data are correct. I have created a Tool using Survey123, web maps, hosted feature layers, ExperienceBuilder, and Microsoft Power Automate. There are several purposes of this Tool: 1) collect data regarding a landowner's interest in implementing conservation practices on their land (using 3 different surveys (with polygons) with 1 being the "Master" version that the other 2 write to and Microsoft PA), 2) keeping track of landowner contact information (survey), 3) tracking outreach efforts (using 5 different surveys with 1 being the "Master" version that the other 4 write to; point or no geometry), 4) tracking a project's implementation progress (Web maps, ExB, hosted feature layer), and 5) copying data into our organization's main reporting database (Microsoft PA). Data collected in Task 1 is also written to the "Master" database in Task 3 through Microsoft PA (more on this later). The Tool has been constantly evolving; it started out as a preliminary Tool for testing purposes, then in July I migrated the data to a production version (successfully) and now am finishing up version 2.  The data collected in Task 1 above is automatically copied to the layer in Task 3 (minus the geometry). The reason for this is to streamline reporting. The sites in the data in Task 1 can reference the same sites in Task 3, and vice versa. When there is outreach being done on a site that already has been referenced, the user fills out a survey that is automatically attributed with the GlobalID of the original record (using URL parameters). I have configured the attribute table in a map/app that when selected in the map, the user can see all records that reference the selected site, based on that GlobalID. The problem I'm running into is that when I need to migrate data from one version of the Tool to the next, the GlobalIDs change, but the attribute that I have created (containing the GlobalID of the original record) doesn't update, too. So, the link is broken. At this point, I have just under 500 records and have to manually update this value, which is not easy. I did have a workaround the last time I had to migrate data (see this Esri Community post), but as mentioned in update 2, it doesn't work anymore, and the subsequent "fix" did not work for me.  ... View more

We have created a Tool that employs Survey123 Connect, Experience Builder, and Microsoft PowerAutomate to track landowner outreach and project implementation. In some instances, a project boundary has already been created prior to submission of the initial survey. Currently, if the user has an existing shape (maybe given to them by a partner), they must 1) save/zip the existing shape prior to starting the survey, 2) manually outline the project in the Survey123 geoshape question, 3) upload the saved shape to a subsequent attachment question in the survey, and 4) wait for a geospatial analyst to switch out the geometry once the survey has been completed before they can review the site on a map. I'd like to have the capability for the user to upload a zipped shapefile or KML directly into the geoshape question. This would lessen the burden on them to re-digitize something that's already been completed and lessen the burden on the geospatial analyst to manually replace the geometry. In addition, I'd like to have the option to dissolve to multi-part polygons if multiple polygons are in the file so they can be used, too. @IsmaelChivite  ... View more

I need to produce an elevation profile in my ExB app using a custom elevation layer. I have successfully done this using the instructions to "Create a tile package for a web elevation layer" here. However, I noticed that the elevation profile graph that is created in ExB is different from the one I created in ArcPro, even though I used the same elevation and line layers. The elevations are showing correctly in Pro (a range from -0.3 ft to +1.5 ft, see first screenshot) but in ExB, they are showing as -0.85 ft to +4.81 ft (see second screenshot). It seems like even though the elevation layer elevation values are already in feet that ExB thinks they are in meters and converts them? To make sure the units were correct, I repeated my workflow and used my own tiling scheme. The image service states that the elevations are in feet. Any ideas on what might be happening? (This is a copy of the post here as I couldn't figure out how to change a post's community) ... View more