|
POST
|
Yes! Or, if data source C has the same attributes, be able to apply the same configurations.
... View more
06-16-2025
05:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
806
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the reply, @Allen_Zhang. Unfortunately, no. This filters the entire layer for the entire Experience. I need to have different filters and views on different pages. When I have to delete the feature layer view from ArcOnline, recreate it, and link it back to the Experience pages, I have to build the filters/views all over again. I would like the filters/views that I built to not be tied directly to a feature layer, or at least be able to copy/paste to another.
... View more
06-13-2025
05:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
871
|
|
POST
|
Does anyone know if a view can be made available Experience-wide? A little more information: I have an Experience that references several sets of data. These datasets were created in the same formats, mainly so they could be easily understood and didn't require definitions for each attribute in each dataset. One of these attributes is called "Site State." On several pages, I filter the tables and create views for filter widgets based on the region that page is referencing, which focuses on a subset of states. For each page, I have to create a filter on the table and then create a new view for each region. This wouldn't be as big of a deal but the data being referenced are from a view layer, which, if I have to update anything (e.g. domain choices), I have to delete the view layer, update the original layer, recreate the view layer, fix the broken data references in ExB, and then recreate all the filters and views. It would be nice to be able to filter or create a view once and then reference it throughout the Experience and not have it linked to a specific dataset.
... View more
06-12-2025
10:27 AM
|
0
|
10
|
1045
|
|
POST
|
I am having a similar issue--the pulldata function is intermittently not working. Anyone have any ideas what might have changed in the past couple of days? This is preventing users from being able to submit a survey. UPDATE: the record that was being pulled had an apostrophe in the text. Once I removed that, it worked. Any chance this could be fixed? @DougBrowning
... View more
05-29-2025
12:05 PM
|
0
|
1
|
686
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the suggestions. I spent a couple of hours this morning testing and neither options work. 😢 I feel like the first should work, and I got the URL to include the time = now() parameter without error, but the question still sees survey 2 in the state it was in when survey 1 loaded. The second doesn't work because there's no calculation. However, I did try adding a "recalculate" parameter to the URL, but that failed, too. Appreciate the ideas...and any more anyone can provide. I feel like this is a common task and am curious how other organizations do this.
... View more
04-09-2025
08:19 AM
|
1
|
0
|
318
|
|
POST
|
I have a survey where a user can collect data regarding a site (survey 1). In addition to geometry (polygon), the survey consists of select one, select multiple, dates, repeat questions, text, and attachments. One section in this survey is landowner contact information. To reduce data input and for quality control (since a landowner can own more than one site), I have a separate survey where the user enters landowner contact information (survey 2). This includes name, address, and phone number. This is basically a digital address book. I have connected survey 2 to survey 1 by using "search" in the appearance field in Survey123 Connect in survey 1, which points to survey 2. The user can start entering a landowner's name and select it from the list. Then in subsequent questions, the data auto-displays. However, this workflow only works if the landowner data has already been collected. If my users start survey 1, start typing a name and it's not in the list, they have to discard the survey, open up survey 2, complete that, and then go back to survey 1. I have tried embedding a link to the second survey in survey 1, but since survey 1 has already been started, and even if survey 2 is completed in a new tab, survey 1 doesn't "see" the new record. The user still has to refresh survey 1. Any ideas on how to get survey 1 to "see" the new record? Or, even better, if the contact doesn't exist in the list when queried in survey 1, give the option to create a new contact there?
... View more
04-08-2025
12:58 PM
|
0
|
2
|
391
|
|
BLOG
|
That totally makes sense now! Appreciate the explanation. I did a quick search but couldn't find anything: do you do blog posts regularly? I'd be interested in reading those, if you can provide the location. Your explanations are so well constructed; I can understand the logic much better than any other Python source I've come across.
... View more
03-31-2025
05:35 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3504
|
|
BLOG
|
@RichardFairhurst : Thank you for such a great resource. I've been able to implement a solution using "Example 3 - Transfer of Multiple Field Values between Feature Classes involving Complex Field Manipulations" and am trying to understand a part of it: In line 23, updateRow[1] refers to the URL field ("UrlField1") of the update feature class and valueDict[keyValue][0] is the value field ("ValueField") of the source feature class. I'm wondering why the valueDict[keyValue] is [0] and not [1]? In the sourceFieldsList, "ValueField" is in the second position and since Python starts from 0, shouldn't that value be [1]? The "UrlField1" is in the second position in the updateFieldsList, so I expect it to be [1]. Obviously your code works, I'm just trying to learn! I'm sharing this with my colleagues because it's been so helpful!
... View more
03-28-2025
12:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3579
|
|
POST
|
Talked with Esri Tech Support and found that the issue is fixed if the appearance setting that I entered (minimal) is removed so the cell is empty. Not a huge deal for me to keep the question expanded. Just thought if anyone else was having this issue that I'd let people know of the solution!
... View more
03-26-2025
09:59 AM
|
1
|
0
|
865
|
|
POST
|
If I'm understanding correctly, I would try something like this in the calculation field: if(selected(${accessible},'No'),"N/A","Inlet and Outlet") If the accessible question is marked "No," return "N/A," else return "Inlet and Outlet."
... View more
03-04-2025
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
318
|
|
POST
|
This worked for me: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-blog/survey123-tricks-of-the-trade-download-survey-data/ba-p/1141835
... View more
03-04-2025
12:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
301
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for your response. I've tried this but it doesn't work. 😞 @ZacharySutherby @JenniferAcunto
... View more
03-03-2025
08:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
961
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately that gives the same behavior. Works in Survey123 Connect but not in the actual survey.
... View more
02-26-2025
05:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1002
|
|
POST
|
I have a survey where if a user has (a) file(s) that contain existing geometry, they mark a select_one question "Yes" (the only option) and then are asked to attach the file(s) in a subsequent question (file_repeat). I have entered the following into the file_repeat question's required field, so the survey can't be submitted without adding an attachment: selected(${exist_geo},'yes'). In testing in Survey123 Connect, the survey displays as it should: However, when filling out the survey on a browser after publishing in Survey123 Connect, after the user selects "Yes," the "Attachments" section does not toggle to "Required" and the user can submit the survey without attaching anything: In the Excel spreadsheet, the "Field Type Information" for the required cell displays this data validation error: I have tried: Changing the required field to "yes" and entering "selected(${exist_geo},'yes')" to the constraint field Changing "yes" to "Yes" in selected(${exist_geo},'yes') Changing single quotation marks to double in selected(${exist_geo},'yes') Moving selected(${exist_geo},'yes') to the required field in the file record rather than the file_repeat record Updating Survey123 Connect to the most recent version Help! @DougBrowning
... View more
02-25-2025
07:57 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1030
|
|
POST
|
There are a couple of things: If you want to have an email always sent, you have to remove the condition, otherwise it will only be sent when that condition is satisfied. I've never played with attaching files to emails, but are you trying to attach the file that's associated with the record that's being modified (the trigger) or a different file that's been saved to OneDrive? If it's the latter, you need to make sure OneDrive is connected to the Flow somehow (I don't see it in there now). I worked with Esri Services to help get my Flow working. There's not great documentation out there--now that I have something that works, I know I wouldn't have been able to figure out my process without assistance.
... View more
02-20-2025
06:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
746
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10-10-2024 05:11 AM | |
| 1 | 09-12-2025 11:19 AM | |
| 1 | 09-12-2025 10:33 AM | |
| 6 | 08-14-2025 11:12 AM | |
| 1 | 08-01-2025 11:13 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|