|
POST
|
Thanks Robert, How would I then change the language settings? I cannot seem to find anyway to do it. If I go to My organizations and then in Change settings, I already tried to change the language to English under the General tab. Actually, it was already in english, but everything seems in Italian anyway regardless of the settings. Is there any other way to change the laguage? Thanks for the answer.
... View more
07-17-2017
08:41 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2359
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jayanta Poddar and thanks for the response. I checked that I have enough credits. The feature layer seems published properly (I can see it in the Map Viewer as I said, and navigate and query it without problems). I read the links you provided and they say the same as the one I provided. Everything seems fine: the file geodatabase contains only multipatch featureclasses in web mercator; I was able to zip it, upload it, and publish it to AGOL. In the datails I see the option to publish it as a Scene Layer (which I suppose not to be able to see if it wasn't made correctly), but when I click it nothing happens
... View more
07-17-2017
03:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2359
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I am following this procedure to publish a scene layer from a file geodatabase with only multipatch featureclass. I seem to recall that I already performed such operation in the past, when this option was still in beta, and I succeeded. However, now it seems not to work anymore. This is what I am doing: I created a file geodatabase with only multipach inside, all in Web Mercator reference system (EPSG: 3857, or 102100). I zipped it and uploaded it to my AGOL (logged in as administrator), choosing to publishing it as a Feature Service. I can open and see it in a Map viewer. Now, inside the details of this same Feature Service, I click on the Publish button and then on "Scene Layer", but nothing happens. How can I solve this problem? Is there anything I did not consider in my workflow? Thanks.
... View more
07-17-2017
02:08 AM
|
0
|
9
|
2808
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Don Kuehne for clarifying. I am not an AutoCAD user, but what would you suggest if I had to ask a AutoCAD user to insert descriptive data so that I can easily read in ArcMap as GIS attributes? Regardless of the sample I provided here, which would be the best way to go amongst XDATA, XRECORDS, DICTIONARY OBJECTS, OBJECT DATA and Custom Object Properties? Which would be read much easier from (e.g.) Data Interoperability (easier = with the least effort)? Thanks in advance for the great reply.
... View more
06-27-2017
08:15 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3975
|
|
POST
|
Hi Bruce Harold. Sorry for the late reply. Anyway, The DWG has etended data, I could see them from AutoCAD. So the problems actually are: 1) why shuould I need Data Interoperability to import AutoCAD solids in ArcGIS although stated differently in the documentation, and 2) how can I find and convert extended data (also with Data Interoperability) to "GIS attributes"? The only workaround I found so far is to: Convert the DWG to IFC using Civil3D. This creates some unique GlobalIDs. Export the IFC table with the GlobalIDs with Navisworks in (e.g.) CSV format. Import the IFC from point 1 into ArcGIS with Data Interoperability->I can see the solids as multipatch with GlobaIDs but no extended data in the attribute table. Join the multipatch with the table generated in 2 through the GlobalIDs. Obviously, this is super ugly, as it involves one ArcGIS extension and two commercial softwares, and it is only acceptable for few imports and only for those lucky enough to have all these softwares.
... View more
06-26-2017
03:53 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3975
|
|
POST
|
I don't have it anymore, but I remeber that each level was cached 100%, and not only I zoomed at Full extent in my mxd while publishing from ArcMap, but also a bit farther because I thought that could be the problem.
... View more
06-23-2017
02:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
827
|
|
POST
|
Apparently, the same mxd and the same workflow without workarounds works fine with version 10.4. Might be a BUG of 10.5?
... View more
06-19-2017
01:57 AM
|
0
|
2
|
827
|
|
POST
|
I am facing a strange problem which I could not explain. I have saved some mxd as tile pakage from ArcMap's File->Share As->Tile Package, uploaded them onto my AGOL and published them as Tile Services. The tiling scheme is the AGOL/Google Map/etc. one, and cahce is created for levels 0 to 19. My map extent is set to "Full extent", in the data frame properties I have no clipping options. The reference system of my layers is the same for all layers (generally, WGS84 UTM Zone 32N), and the data frame is Web Mercator (EPSG: 3857). Even if the mxd is very simple (e.g. one linear featureclass with just one geometry representing a boundary) I still get this problem: tiles are showing up completely only for bigger scales (less detailed), but the bottom part of the service is getting somehow cut as the detail gets higher. The only thing which has worked so far was 1) creating a new mxd and dragging and dropping all the layers it it and publishing it, and 2) setting the zoom in the mxd to something farther than the full extent. Don't know which of these solved the problem though. Any idea? I am using ArcMap 10.5. (one last thing: whenever I use create the Tile Package ArcMap keeps saying the te prject has been changed and I need to save...). Here is a screenshot of a Web Map for different level of zoom showing a "working" tile layer (the red line) and s "corrupted" one.
... View more
06-19-2017
01:19 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1478
|
|
POST
|
This is great news! Indeed, I tried the exact same procedure I described above, this time choosing "GEODATABASE_FILE (ArcObjects)" as output format instead of "File Geodatabase API". Everything worked just fine! Thank you.
... View more
05-31-2017
08:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2575
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Bruce for taking the time to test it. Anyway, I will come back to this and possibly mark your answer as correct, but I would need time to see the differences in the settings (I am newbie with FME stuff). What I saw looking at the parameters quickly, is that we used a different output format (you chose GEODATABASE_FILE (ArcObjects) I have FILEGDB). Also, you have two voices under Feature Types under the output which I don't have, namely "PropertySetDefinition" and "QuantitySetDefinition". Again, I'll ome back to this as soon as I can. Thanks for the response, and meanwhile if you could give me some details on what you did it would be very appreciated.
... View more
05-30-2017
09:19 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2575
|
|
POST
|
I am trying to use the Data Interoperability extension within ArcGIS Pro (1.4.1) to reproduce what I was able to do from within ArcMap: converting a IFC to a ESRI fGDB format. The IFC has solid geometries and I would need to export them as multipatch. I attached the IFC if anybody is interested in helping. First thing I noted: there is no Quick Import in PRO. With ArcMap, I sued to use the Quick Import with the settings provided in this ESRI post and the translation was succesfull. In PRO I tried this workflow with no success (steps, figures, and results): Creation of a new ETL Tool from the Project Pane Location and Name choice Generate Workspace Window settings (Coord. System should be correct, and it worked with the Quick Import in ArcMap) IFC parameters settings as in ESRI post. Choice of the Feature Types (I left everything checked as the default) Model execution (through the green RUN button) The output is just a bunch of Tables and some empty linear featureclasses. Also, I attached the Translation Log if it might help. From ArcMap, using the same dataset, same coordinate system, and same IFC parameters as in the linked post, I am able to export multipatch geometries. Unfortunately, ArcMap is not an option right now, and I have to stick with PRO to do this. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Finally, I attached the zipped GDB derived from this process (test_DataInteropPRO_SR.gdb.zip).
... View more
05-30-2017
02:40 AM
|
1
|
4
|
3741
|
|
POST
|
Already found the solution. Publishing with the tools mentioned above will end up loosing layers subdivision. I had to publish it via "Share As->Tile Package" which is available only after check the "Runtime tools" option in Customize > ArcMap Options > Sharing (from ArcMap). This is exmplained here and here.
... View more
05-29-2017
03:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
946
|
|
POST
|
I am having this problem: since generating the tile cache directly on AGOL consumes credits, I do it on my machine through the combination of "Manage Tile Cache" and "Export Tile Cache" tools. My mxd has two layers. The "Export Tile Cache" produces a Tile Package (TPK) file which I can upload to my AGOL and then publish it from the element details to have my hosted tile layer in my contents. I have another element in my contents which is the same service published as a hosted Featrue Service. All I want to do now is displaying my Tile layer in a Web Map and linking it to the Feature Service of the same name in order to query it. Unfortunately, I see only one layer in the legend of my tile layer, but it should have two. This way I can only link it to either one or another feature layer within my feature service one at a time, but I need to link both my tile layers to both the feature layers. This is not occurring when publishing directly using the Share As and selecting both Tile and Feature Access capabilities, but this consumes a lot of credits for my scale levels, and I have to avoid it. Any suggestion wuold be greatly appreciated, thanks.
... View more
05-29-2017
02:37 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1603
|
|
POST
|
Great, thanks! The problem was indeed I had a fieldname with a strange character (it's a "°"). Simply hiding this field led me publish the layer succesfully. Thank you very much.
... View more
05-26-2017
05:23 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1570
|
|
POST
|
Hi. Many times I publish feature services from ArcMap (10.4.1) with the button Share As to my AGOL account. I noticed that if the layers in the mxd are a lot, and somehow heavy (many geometries and many fields), the publishing processes sometimes throw errors. So, I always split my mxd in many different mxds with each one or two layers. While using this strategy I am able to finish the whole publishing process, after a "published succeeded" message, when I enter my AGOL and see my feature layers in the web map they are empty (no geometries nor attributes). The only this that have worked so far was to hide some fields in my layers before publishing them, and, after publishing them, I am able to see them correctly. I know there might be limitations due to the number of records/geometries, but it should also be stated that having too many fields will cause the feature layers not to upload correctly, although the publishing process from ArcMap does not throw any error. In my specific case, this happened (e.g.) with a polygon shapefile with 415 records, and 20 fields. It does not seem so much to me, also considering the fields are 50% text and 50% short intger.
... View more
05-25-2017
08:29 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2604
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-23-2018 06:39 AM | |
| 1 | 01-31-2018 06:01 AM | |
| 1 | 10-16-2018 03:42 AM | |
| 1 | 10-24-2019 06:05 AM | |
| 1 | 06-26-2017 03:53 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|