|
POST
|
Does it indicate anything that the cell taking the value 0 originally had a value of -0.149068, which is the minimum value in the original raster? Why is a separate class automatically created for this value?
... View more
05-08-2025
12:03 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2537
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2: Setting a mask brings “ERROR 000539” when performing the “raster calculator” tool, In the screenshots below, if the mask is set to the “LandsatTM2001.img” raster, then performing the “raster calculator” tool results in “ERROR 000539”. If the mask is left blank, the “raster calculator” tool works successfully. What could be the issue here? The data is attached
... View more
05-07-2025
11:42 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1602
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2: How to set the coordinate system of a particular layer to "Unknown"? For example, in the screenshot below, the “Define Projection” tool does not appear to provide an option to set the coordinate system of the layer to "Unknown."
... View more
05-07-2025
02:53 AM
|
0
|
1
|
846
|
|
POST
|
I set the 'New' value for NODATA to 7. However, the Reclassify tool produces 4 classes, even though the number of classes is set to 3, as shown in the screenshots below. What could be the reason behind the class with the value '0'?
... View more
05-06-2025
11:56 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2561
|
|
POST
|
You are right. I recreated everything from scratch—aprx, atbx, model, scratch workspace gdb, etc.—and found that everything appears to be working as expected
... View more
05-06-2025
11:10 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1066
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2: Reclassifying a raster into two classes results in three, In the screenshots below, I attempted to classify a raster into two classes using the “Reclassify” tool, but the output ends up with three classes. What could be causing this issue? The data raster is attached.
... View more
05-06-2025
04:36 AM
|
0
|
7
|
2620
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2: The pop-up fails to return values for the cells of band 5 obtained from a six-band imagery, In the screenshots below, I couldn’t figure out why the pop-up fails to return values for the cells of band 5 obtained from a six-band imagery. Band 5 was obtained using the “make raster layer” and “copy raster” tools. This happens even though the pop-up is able to return values for all other bands extracted using the same technique. What could be the issue here? The imagery is attached
... View more
05-06-2025
12:39 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1138
|
|
POST
|
It is very frustrating that the behavior is not stable. Now, the pop-up is able to retrieve values from three rasters out of four! By the way, I observed the following: If the pop-up is unable to retrieve a value for a particular raster, two things happen: Exporting the layout of that raster as a PDF results in a file where the raster is not displayed. If the “Classify” method is used as the symbology method, the raster disappears. It’s like a syndrome—with no clear reason for this strange behavior!
... View more
05-05-2025
11:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
885
|
|
POST
|
It’s as if ArcGIS Pro has no consistent behavior when working with model builder. This frustrating error is illogical and frequently appears without any clear reason.
... View more
05-05-2025
10:33 AM
|
2
|
0
|
3555
|
|
POST
|
It seems that I'm unable to clearly explain the issue.
... View more
05-05-2025
10:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
743
|
|
POST
|
What’s frustrating is that ArcGIS Pro—specifically the model builder—is not stable. With the same settings, it sometimes works as if there were never an issue. Then, after a while, running the model again triggers the same error. Is this a bug? We never encountered such issues in ArcMap when working with rasters.
... View more
05-05-2025
10:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2727
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2: The “Pop-up” tool returns no values for some visible rasters, In the screenshot below, the “Pop-up” tool returns no values for some visible rasters, even though these rasters are derived from the same source layer, as shown in the model. What could be causing this issue? The data is attached.
... View more
05-05-2025
10:18 AM
|
0
|
2
|
914
|
|
POST
|
But the physical source of each layer in the Contents pane is known, so it is assumed that the layer is recognized based on its physical location on the drive.
... View more
05-05-2025
09:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
956
|
|
POST
|
Thanks, Alfred Baldenweck. The issue was that once the “Georeference” button is clicked, the imagery disappears, and you're not given the option to perform the georeferencing steps.
... View more
05-05-2025
09:37 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2098
|
|
IDEA
|
Here, the “integer” tool fails to respect the “scratch workspace” set in the environment. Is this by design?
... View more
05-05-2025
02:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1608
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-30-2022 10:43 PM | |
| 2 | 05-05-2025 10:33 AM | |
| 1 | 05-08-2025 09:49 PM | |
| 1 | 05-06-2025 11:10 PM | |
| 1 | 02-20-2021 01:23 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|