Latest Contributions by Amanda__Huber

@ShelleySchulte1  We're using ArcGIS Online and I assumed the AGOL update on the 13th may have broken it, but if you are seeing it in Portal too that's interesting.  ... View more

We're also experiencing this issue, I just opened an Esri support case.  Thank you for posting information about your bug.  ... View more

Hi @TonghuiMing,  Thank you for looking into it, we really appreciate it. We have numerous use cases for using S123 in the Embed widget with URL parameters (not only params coming from the data) vs the S123 widget.    Thanks,  Amanda ... View more

Hi @TianWen,  I just tested today with no modifications made since my prior reply (and no map) and it appears to be working as it should now. I'm curious what fixed the issue but nonetheless happy it's working.  Thank you for your time,  Amanda ... View more

@TianWen @jcarlson  Update- I added a map widget with the data and it miraculously started working- this suggests that there is an issue with filter widgets and data tables as a standalone product.  @TianWen can you reproduce on your end? There are plenty of use cases where users will need to filter visualize tabular data without the need for a map.  Thank you,  Amanda ... View more

@JamesTedrick  Follow my thought process here as we are also experiencing this issue and have an open Esri Support case.  There appear to be flaws in this workflow- if by "best practice" the stakeholder view is the service that should be shared and added to other applications. If a new field is added to the survey and the workflow is to delete this layer and re-create it (by sharing it again) this generates a new AGOL service and item ID... therefore breaking the applications that were created from the initial stakeholder_view (JSON references item IDs).  Help me out here, does anyone else see issues in this workflow for such a critical layer in S123? Thanks! ... View more

@jcarlson Thanks for confirming. That was going to be my next test, to add a map. That being said, if that does work and resolves the issue this is not a good solution. Filters and Tables should work together independent of maps. I'll test and update this thread.  Thanks,  Amanda ... View more

@jcarlson and @TianWen ,  Thanks for your reply! To answer your question Josh, It's set up just like yours using the AND option:    The only difference I see between our Experiences is that you have a map in yours, where we do not. Could this be affecting it @TianWen ? We are using the same data source across both widgets.  Thanks,  Amanda ... View more

ZhifangWang Our organization is also experiencing this issue with one of our S123 data pages in V3.12 (published from Connect).    After coming across this post we tried clearing our Chrome cache and even tested in incognito with no luck. Upon further digging, I investigated the backend JSON and found that this error was being flagged by some "invalid HTML content". Seems strange right?     Well upon looking at the two records giving us this error it appears the > and < symbols in a String field were the entire reason why this whole thing wasn't working.      Simply > and < characters broke the whole thing. As far as I've been able to tell these are not 'illegal characters' in the ArcGIS Online data world and should not be throwing this error.  When troubleshooting in the issue further, I tested editing the data through the item details page in AGOL (vs S123) and discovered this error message:   Therefore I'm not sure if this is an AGOL issue or S123 issue (since pit was published and created through S123 connect) but I would like to get to the bottom of this.      ZhifangWang is this a bug?  Here's the string of text for testing: Kayak size? (Small < 120 lbs., Medium 120-200 lbs., Large > 200 lbs.) Thank you,  Amanda     ... View more

Hi @Jim-Moore and @ZhifangWang,  Thank you so much for this quick resolution, we really appreciate it! ... View more

To contribute to this, I've done more testing and this appears to affect more question types than we previously thought:  Select Multiple have the appearance of being already checked (!?) the xls form has no other settings on:   ... View more