|
POST
|
Hi Jamal; The network rules have changed significantly from the geometric network to the utility network. With the release of ArcGIS Pro 2.6, you may want to explore the trace network as an option for your network requirements. The trace network has tools to enable you to convert geometric networks directly into trace network formats with more simple schemas and trace directions as a function of the direction of the line edit. I would encourage you to watch Larry's trace network overview during our session during the virtual UC (below). During the ArcGIS Pro 2.6 release the trace network also has flow arrows (as per your other Geonet post). https://userconference2020.schedule.esri.com/schedule/1098813612
... View more
06-25-2020
01:48 PM
|
3
|
0
|
781
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jamal; The utility network team are certainty working on flow direction arrows; unfortunately, they did not make the cut for the July 2020 release, but we hope that work can be completed for 1st quarter, 2021.
... View more
06-25-2020
01:40 PM
|
5
|
1
|
3666
|
|
POST
|
Hi Naveen; As you transition your ArcGIS Utility Network license from a server type (pre-ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8), to a User Type Extension (post-ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8) the utility network extensions should be provisioned via a license file to your organization. That license file is appended to your ArcGIS Enterprise and distributed by your organization's administrators. If you have questions, I would certainly have your organization reach out to your partner rep for further guidance. Thanks, Remi
... View more
06-08-2020
08:59 PM
|
1
|
3
|
5005
|
|
POST
|
A utility network option for ArcGIS Online is on the roadmap, but at this time we don't have a specific target for releasing that capability. As soon as we have an update for that feature on the roadmap I would be glad to pass it along.
... View more
03-25-2020
05:57 PM
|
2
|
0
|
3242
|
|
POST
|
Remember, the Electric Foundation model is just your first step. Based upon your question you can either modify the service point properties to include meter fields that are already available in the device layer, or you can add another LV Meter Asset type (don't forget your rules) and add appropriate fields already in the device layer.
... View more
03-21-2020
09:10 AM
|
0
|
0
|
746
|
|
POST
|
Those are great questions. The release of ArcGIS Pro 2.5 includes the ability to create a utility network in file geodatabase configuration without the ArcGIS Utility Network extension. The intent of the file geodatabase configuration of the utility network is to enable a single-user environment for prototyping utility network schema, rules, and functionality. It can certainly be used by utilities with a single GIS specialist. The file geodatabase has all the trace, network management and diagram capabilities of an enterprise geodatabase, but it is limited to that single user and cannot be published to the mobile environment or as a map or feature service. The ArcGIS Utility Network is a multi-user environment and was designed for utilities to remove information silos and to increase collaboration between utility business departments such as operations, engineering, planning, and maintenance. The “richest capability” you described come from the ability of utilities to extend the ROI of their expensive engineering data and to provide solutions that optimize the volumes of information used to coordinate and manage their assets, operations, and customers. The utility network leverages many of the opportunities of the ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8 release and was designed to streamline communication and collaboration across your business. With the ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8 and the ArcGIS Utility Network, utilities can publish their assets and facilities across their organization everywhere. The new User Type Extension for the ArcGIS Utility Network enables a more secure method of expanding the capability of their business, provides a safer operating environment, grows their customer base, and delivers a more reliable product to their customers.
... View more
02-14-2020
03:48 PM
|
3
|
3
|
3242
|
|
POST
|
The reason behind the service area was to create the optimal indexing structures for the utility network. These structures include the index on the dirty feature class and the future spatial partitioning of the network index. So creating a service area that is bigger than needed will have a potential negative side effect in that the spatial index is not going to be optimal but it will still function. The actual performance impact varies based upon the size of your network and the number of users; the development team has spent a few cycles optimizing performance so the margins should not be too great. I would caution that spatial accuracies vary based upon projection systems, so building a service territory that exceeds the projection system could create accuracy issues.
... View more
04-17-2019
03:17 PM
|
1
|
1
|
2977
|
|
POST
|
No worries, I could see where the transformation & conversions of gcs features would be difficult to handle. Still it was a good question to ask. Thanks for reaching out. Remi
... View more
12-06-2018
12:07 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2330
|
|
POST
|
While most users & partners are using some form of projected coordinate system for implementations; there should be no limitation that would impact a data set that is projected with a geographic coordinate system. If you have specifics or aware of a bug, please let us know and we can look into it. Thanks, Remi
... View more
12-06-2018
11:27 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2330
|
|
POST
|
Same thing as above; for your first step just ping this issue to your sales team and they will get you started, if its a bug, they can assist in getting it turned in. Tell them to reach out to me if needed, but they should understand the issue
... View more
05-18-2018
08:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1997
|
|
POST
|
Rob Report this issue to your sales team and they will get you going. Tell them to reach out to me if needed, but they should understand the issue
... View more
05-17-2018
09:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1997
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the screenshots, I am passing them on to the PEs on the utility network team. Will give you feedback as soon as I get a response.
... View more
04-19-2018
07:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1862
|
|
POST
|
Check with your sales team to make sure you have the right authorization file for the utility network publishing. If you continue to have issues please let me know and I will follow up with the utility network team.
... View more
04-17-2018
12:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1997
|
|
POST
|
Check with your sales team to make sure you have the right authorization file for the utility network. If you continue to have issues please let me know and I will follow up with the utility network team.
... View more
04-17-2018
12:52 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1862
|
|
POST
|
Hi T D, Thanks for the questions. 1) The ArcGIS Utility Network Management Extension was designed to be run in ArcGIS Enterprise 10.6 and above and most of the heavy lifting (edits, analytics and other good stuff) is limited to ArcGIS Pro at the moment. We anticipate further enhancements across web and mobile solutions. The utility network utilizes a new form of branch versioning which unfortunately ArcMap is unable to recognize even though the feature service is published through REST endpoints like other services. 2) The tools provided for utility network support are currently available only in ArcGIS Pro. 3) Unfortunately, ArcMap is unable to recognize the new versioning through REST services. I hope this answers your questions.
... View more
04-04-2018
02:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1997
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 04-17-2019 03:17 PM | |
| 1 | 08-10-2023 06:57 AM | |
| 1 | 10-25-2021 10:08 AM | |
| 3 | 08-25-2021 08:30 AM | |
| 2 | 03-25-2020 05:57 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|