Latest Contributions by RemiMyers

Will take a bit of development work, hoping to consider it for next years release. ... View more

It's still under consideration but design has not yet started.  Really hoping we could get it included next year. ... View more

Hello Juha; I will be at IMGIS as well, and although I do not have demo of the telecom with transmission yet, I would anticipate that we can discuss and showcase the various methods that could be supported in either the traditional or the telecom domains in the utility network.  While the focus on the new telecom capabilities still wrap around fiber (and extending nonspatial object capability) you can absolutely manage a system that has fiber and copper in a telecom domain.   We look forward to more discussion this week. Remi   ... View more

Hi @JuhaHaanpera  Thank you for your interest in the upcoming Network Management release and the Telecom Domain capabilities.  At this time the ArcGIS Utility Network and the Telecom Domain are only exposed via Mobile or File geodatabase or via ArcGIS Enterprise in a local or cloud deployment.  To use an ArcGIS Online deployment, the only option is the data structure without supporting network topology. If your customer is looking at modeling their physical assets such as cable and devices, then a traditional utility network with the Communications Foundation set of solutions could be your answer.  It offers a sample array of common wire and device configurations and gives you the ability to expand as needed.   If they are more interested in mapping fiber and ports leveraging table rows instead of spatial features (nonspatial objects), then the Telecom Domain could be more appropriate.  It was designed to provide a better user experience when managing large volumes of fiber strands in cable and ports in devices.  It is important to note that we strongly recommend engaging with a partner to extend the user experience and provide a more efficient migration to production. To answer your question, it really depends upon your customers need to provide a model of asset location or if they need to represent their fiber configuration to solve their business challanges.  Either way, I recommend attending International IMGIS for more details and discussion with ESRI and Partners to provide the best road forward for your communication solutions  (https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/international-imgis/overview). ... View more

Great to hear, and thanks for the follow-up! ... View more

Hey Joshua; I am closing this ask because its a configuration change to the model and not functionality that the development team would ship out in a future release of the utility network.  I recommend that you reach out to your sales manager and they should be able to help you configure your model as needed. If you need further details, please feel free to reach out for more details. Thanks, Remi ... View more

Thanks so much for the request Ben.   We will include it in the roadmap but extensive JavaScript work will be needed to include it as a widget; unfortunately, because of existing commitments, I don't see us starting this work within the next 12 months.  If anything changes, I will post it here.   Thanks again. Remi ... View more

As per discussion below. ... View more

As per Robert's comments above ... View more

As per Robert's comment above. ... View more

@PabloCuadrado, Correct, user with type Viewer without an Advanced Editing User Type extension (replaces Utility Network, Trace Network, and Parcel Fabric extensions) is able to trace features. ... View more

ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2 depreciated the ArcGIS Utility Network User Type extension and replaced it with the Advanced Editor User Type extension.  Post ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2 trace operations no longer need a Advanced Editor User Type extension. ... View more

As mentioned in (https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idi-p/9385580 PLSCadd exports to dxf and a range of spreadsheets which are already available via the ArcGIS Enterprise.  If interoperability is needed FME by Safe Software could certainly be an option. ... View more

PLS-CADD exports to DXF and pole spotting list such as MS Excel or other tables which can already be loaded in ArcGIS Pro.  If further interoperability is needed, FME by Safe Software could be a viable option. ... View more