|
POST
|
Hello @ShelbyZelonisRoberson, Unfortunately I don't have an ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.1 environment readily available to me at the moment (working on obtaining one now). ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.1 supports attachment keywords for Hosted Feature services by default not registered services as the attachment table created in an Enterprise Geodatabase doesn't support keywords by default. I haven't tested this workflow (in theory I think it should work) but Pro 2.7 added a new Geoprocessing tool called Upgrade Attachments, the tool adds two fields KEYWORDS and EXIFINFO to the attachment table schema in the Enterprise Geodatabase. Once these fields are added keywords specified in an Add Attachment REST call should be added to the attachment table in the EGDB. Until I can explicitly test I'm not sure if that will work or if it will work in Survey123 reports either. Once I have access to an environment I will test the workflow and update this post with testing results. Thank you, Zach
... View more
03-02-2021
10:23 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3495
|
|
POST
|
Hello @JarrettCziesch1, For reverse geocoding on public facing surveys is the issue specific to the Webform, Field App, or both? If the behavior is present in the Webform please open the F12 developer tools in your browser and select the Network tab. When you try to run the reverse geocode if you select the request that is being send to the geocode service is the response "token required"? Thank you, Zach
... View more
03-02-2021
09:21 AM
|
0
|
3
|
6287
|
|
POST
|
Hello @JarrettCziesch1, Please note JavaScript functions do not work with public surveys. This isn't a new limitation of 3.12 this has been a limitation since their implementation at 3.10. Please refer to the known limitations section of the JavaScript functions documentation for reference: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/survey123/desktop/create-surveys/pulldatajavascript.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_2A1B3F6B4F4741E9BC1BE519E671E565 Please refer to this link for the ArcGIS Ideas post for supporting JavaScript functions on public surveys and the associated ENH number. As for the pulldata using a CSV not working please check the CSV to ensure none of the column headers use any of these reserved words: https://www.sqlite.org/lang_keywords.html If none of the column headers use any of those reserved words would I be able to obtain a copy of the survey and the CSV for testing on my end? Please feel free to send it to ZSutherby@esri.com and I'll be happy to take a look into the behavior. Thank you, Zach
... View more
03-02-2021
09:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6288
|
|
POST
|
Hello @BamJam, Thank you for passing along the XLSForm and associated CSV. I had tested on my end and narrowed the issue down to the column header missing for column A in the CSV. Once I added a column header (ID for example), saved the CSV, and refreshed the survey the pulldata() functions worked as expected. The reason it broke with 3.12 was because we switched to a database approach for managing content, and since the column header was missing the CSV wasn't being imported into the database. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-25-2021
03:19 PM
|
2
|
10
|
6417
|
|
POST
|
Hello @ChrisMaclaurin, In the sample that Ismael provided in that other post he's querying the feature service's REST endpoint. In his sample he's using 1=1 for the `where` parameter which is searching all fields and attributes. You can change that `where` parameter to be where=<PlaceNameField>=<PlaceNameValue>. As for returning the latest submitted value you can specify the `orderByFields` parameter to sort by submitted date or last edit date. Please use this link for reference regarding the query feature/layer operation: https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/services-reference/query-feature-service-layer-.htm Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-16-2021
05:11 PM
|
1
|
7
|
3256
|
|
POST
|
Hello @JJ_Lightfoot, Are you using the latest 3.11 release of ArcGIS Survey123? If you also test with the 3.12 build we have in our Early Adopter Community to see if the same behavior persists there as well. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-10-2021
02:29 PM
|
0
|
2
|
3212
|
|
POST
|
Hello @GabrielaWaesch1, Typically we have seen this behavior when there is an HTTP to HTTPS redirect configured on IIS instead of handled by the ArcGIS Enterprise organization. The workaround has been to disable the redirect on IIS and set the ArcGIS Enterprise Organization to HTTPS only. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-10-2021
12:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2907
|
|
POST
|
Hello @JasonSimpson, Since "New record submitted" and "Existing record edited" are enabled for the Trigger events the webhook should trigger automatically whether a new survey is submitted or an existing record is edited. I had tested on my end with a public survey in Chrome set to trigger a webhook when a new record is submitted and when a record is updated and I am not seeing the same behavior. What version of Survey123 is the survey using? Is there any difference between submitting as a public user vs a user who is logged in? Are there any differences between browsers? If you open the f12 developer tools in a browser where the behavior is occurring specifically the network panel and submit an edit you should see a request to the payload URL shown on the Webhooks page for the survey. Are you seeing a request submitted to the payload URL when editing a record?
... View more
02-08-2021
06:43 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2659
|
|
POST
|
Hello @pvolte, Yes the version the survey automatically is locked to is the version of ArcGIS Survey123 Connect it was published from. For example if I published from Connect 3.9 automatically the form will use version 3.9 in the Survey123 website, and the Use version the survey was published with (3.9) will be selected. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-08-2021
12:31 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2980
|
|
POST
|
Hello @pvolte, I had tested on my end and I was not able to reproduce the same behavior: Is there a specific browser where this behavior is observed, or is the behavior observed in all browsers? Is the survey using the latest 3.11 version on the settings of the survey? If the survey is using 3.11 and the behavior is reproducible in all browsers would I be able to obtain a copy of the XLSForm for testing on our end? Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-08-2021
11:43 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2985
|
|
POST
|
Hello @JasonSimpson, Is your survey shared publicly, and being edited using the Webform in Internet Explorer or Edge? We have a BUG (BUG-000134259) where surveys edited in that environment are not sending the update trigger for the webhook. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-08-2021
11:30 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2665
|
|
POST
|
Hello @Cyprus_Forest_Department, With 3.12 we are introducing support for indexed repeats. Please check out this EAC documentation for more information on the updates. Specifically I think the `position(..)` function may help with calculating the repeat title. Another option that currently works in 3.11 is to add a hidden question in the survey with the default value of 1, then add a calculate question that uses once(count(${default1Question})) and that will return the current repeat instance. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-08-2021
11:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2171
|
|
POST
|
Hello @ShelbyZelonisRoberson, For your first question you can accomplish this by using a JavaScript function in your survey. Please refer to the JavaScript sample in Survey123 Connect there is a section that queries a Feature Service and returns attribute information based on the location of the Geopoint. Please use this link for more information on JavaScript functions in Survey123: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-blog/extending-survey123-smart-forms-with-custom-js-functions/ba-p/898782 Please use this link for more information on limitations when using JavaScript functions in Survey123: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/survey123/desktop/create-surveys/pulldatajavascript.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_2A1B3F6B4F4741E9BC1BE519E671E565 For your second question I don't think a Webhook would be best because they are more geared towards individual responses. What you can do is use the Survey123 module in the ArcGIS API for Python and specify the `where` parameter to return only records that match a certain District. Ismael wrote a good blog on using Python to configure an email notification system. The email piece of that script can be used to automatically send the email to the Districts email address. Or if you did want to use Webhooks you can use this workflow to use the Python API script in a Webhook. We are in the process of creating documentation to help understand the Survey123 module in the Python API, but I have attached a sample notebook that highlights how to work with Reports using Python. Thank you, Zach
... View more
02-08-2021
11:17 AM
|
2
|
0
|
2731
|
|
POST
|
Hello @LeeIrminger1, Apologies for the delay in reaching out! I wouldn't expect it to be something with the CSV formatting but it could very well be a formatting issue. To remedy that resaving the CSV's using UTF-8 may help if it is a formatting issue. I know you had mentioned that the CSV was present in the media folder upon publishing, just to confirm the CSV isn't also hosted in your organization and linked to the survey correct? If I could obtain a copy of the XLSForm and CSV's I can do some testing on my end and see if I can reproduce the behavior. Feel free to send them to ZSutherby@esri.com if they are not able to be passed through the thread. Thank you, Zach
... View more
01-27-2021
03:57 PM
|
1
|
0
|
5902
|
|
POST
|
Hello @DougBrowning, I have gone ahead and logged an internal issue for 0 not being returned by the pulldata() function. This does work in 3.11 and the Webform. Unfortunately it seems to be a regression with the current 3.12 beta build. As for the Survey123 formulas page not showing on Google, I've noticed the same thing unfortunately that's up to Googles search algorithm we don't have much control over it. I had tested with Bing and DuckDuckGo and they both work like Google used to. What I've been doing lately is selecting the first doc.arcgis.com link that pops up and then searching for it directly within the Survey123 documentation site. Bookmarking the page may also ease finding the doc page. Thank you, Zach
... View more
01-27-2021
03:50 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1973
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 02-27-2026 02:55 PM | |
| 6 | 12-17-2025 01:51 PM | |
| 1 | 11-04-2025 02:14 PM | |
| 1 | 10-15-2025 01:53 PM | |
| 1 | 12-15-2023 04:34 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|