|
POST
|
Pretty sure it has to do with the security store config in Portal Admin: https://webadaptorhost.domain.com/webadaptorname/portaladmin From there you'd go to: Security > Config...and if I'm wrong, someone please correct me... By default, Portal uses a built-in store for both users and groups (named accounts). I feel pretty confident that if we were to change this to use our Active Directory, using my domain account would work. We have kept it as a built-in user store as we may have outside organizations requesting access to web maps, services, etc... We have configured a SAML login using our Active Directory (Portal Home > Organization > Edit Settings > Security > Enterprise Logins via SAML), so this hybrid approach works well for us, where our County employees can use their domain accounts, and any outside user would be a named account. If you want to change the security config of Portal, this link will provide you with examples on how to do that. Keep in mind, if you are using a domain account, or the like, you'll probably want your IT to setup an account with a password that does NOT expire.
... View more
04-10-2019
10:16 AM
|
1
|
1
|
3324
|
|
POST
|
This is a great tool, the only downside I see to it is that it can NOT be used on a table or feature classes registered with the geodatabase. If using Sql Server (which we do), I don't believe you can specify a field with an identity property if using a standard table or feature class.
... View more
03-07-2019
11:18 AM
|
0
|
0
|
991
|
|
POST
|
I recently published a composite locator service using Pro to our Portal (with a federated Server). I re-built the individual locators and would now like to re-publish / overwrite the composite locator service, but don't see a way of doing that within Pro. Am I missing a tool or toolbar somewhere? How does one update / overwrite locator services using Pro?
... View more
01-08-2019
06:11 AM
|
0
|
20
|
8879
|
|
POST
|
I'm curious if anybody has tried loading (appending) enterprise views (Sql Server 2014 Standard in our case) into feature classes using python 3.x with Pro? We have several views that contain geometry (Sql geometry) that are used to compile data from various sources and then load them into non-versioned datasets using truncate and append tools. This process works fine when using python 2.x, however, we've starting testing this process with python 3.x and we've had to kill our python 3.x scripts because we can't tell if any progress is being made. For example, we have a 100k+ parcel dataset that loads in about 5 minutes using python 2.x, but at 30 minutes with python 3.x we killed the script. Curious if any others have tried or tested this, and if you've noticed any differences between python 2.x and 3.x.
... View more
12-19-2018
12:04 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1357
|
|
POST
|
This was exactly our issue. Once I removed the domain from the field, Collector showed the correct domain values for the subtype. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
... View more
12-10-2018
06:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2041
|
|
POST
|
Not sure if anyone else is experiencing these issues, but it seems that with the December 2018 ArcGIS Online update, we are experiencing issues with domain values not getting displayed correctly and forward slashes not propagating to our databases. Some issues that have been pointed out to us from users: Domain coded values are being shown instead of the descriptions within pop-ups Domain values not displaying correct values within Collector Forward slashes not being populated within our database, for example, with hyperlink values when edited through ArcGIS Online. Example: value when entered is: https://gis.linncounty.org/... when edits are saved in ArcGIS Online, all the forward slashes are removed and what is populated in the database is: httpsgis.linncounty.org ... rendering the hyperlink broken.
... View more
12-07-2018
12:27 PM
|
1
|
0
|
729
|
|
POST
|
Created a new group so as to not confuse any of our users. You should see a feature layer and web map both named 'Culvert (Testing)' within this group. The feature layer should have the credentials stored.
... View more
12-07-2018
12:02 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2041
|
|
POST
|
Done. This is the shared group. The map name is: 'Engineering Culvert'
... View more
12-07-2018
10:59 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2041
|
|
POST
|
Some of our field users have noticed that once their devices updated to the 18.0.3 version of Collector, domain dropdowns were no longer showing correctly. Users who are still using 18.0.2 are reporting the domain values still show correctly. Ideas, suggestions, known bugs...? Below are a few examples. Service domain properties Source web map in ArcGIS Online ... domain values are showing correctly. Domain value NOT showing correctly in Collector v18.0.3
... View more
12-07-2018
08:28 AM
|
0
|
7
|
2215
|
|
POST
|
You may want to check this. Any time you edit a feature, you're inserting a new row into the delta table. I think your ID value will increment on every edit (assuming this is the only bit of sql in your trigger).
... View more
12-04-2018
07:59 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3883
|
|
POST
|
Yes ... using the initial admin account works as expected.
... View more
12-03-2018
02:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3324
|
|
POST
|
We have Portal 10.6.1 federated with our ArcGIS Server, and have our Active Directory configured to use as logins with Portal. We have no issues logging into Portal, Pro, or Server Manager using our AD accounts. However, if we try to use our AD accounts with ArcGIS API for Python we continually get an error. We have upgraded to the latest ArcGIS API for Python at the time of writing this (1.5.1). Is this a known defect...?...or is there some configuration to our Portal we need to do? The syntax I'm using is: arcgis.GIS('PortalURL', 'linncnty\\mboyle', 'ADPassword') Below is a screenshot of the error we get, failing to generate a token.
... View more
12-03-2018
02:15 PM
|
1
|
7
|
3848
|
|
POST
|
What are other user's recommendations for publishing services with Pro? We would like to enable our users to pick and choose feature layers to add within their Portal web maps or Pro. Is it better / recommended / best practice to create one map with several layers (ex: address points, centerlines, parcels, easements, etc...) and share the web layers? ... creating one map image layer with several feature layers OR share each layer individually (right-click, share as web layer) creating one map image layer and one feature layer? I suppose I see pros and cons to each, but am wondering if there is a preferred option? Thanks!
... View more
10-15-2018
11:03 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1476
|
|
POST
|
Ryan Uthoff, I did a quick test after publishing this post, and yes, the item id of the published map image layer (map service) and feature layer (feature service) did stay the same. I am familiar with the allow unique assignment ... and for everything you mention ... would definitely recommend this to anyone publishing services with more than 1 layer. As an aside to publishing services with Pro ... if we want to generate feature layers for our users to consume within Portal or Pro, is it generally best to publish layers individually or publish a map with several layers? For example, say for our real estate division, would it be best to publish 1 map service with several feature layers (address points, parcels, road centerlines, easements, etc...) or publish individual map service and feature services for each layer?
... View more
10-15-2018
10:52 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4329
|
|
POST
|
When you overwrite a feature layer (federated, not hosted) with Pro, does a new item get created?...or does the existing item get retained? If a new item is created, how are you supposed to keep feature layer sources within a web map?...doesn't this essentially break a data source within the web map?
... View more
10-15-2018
09:54 AM
|
0
|
3
|
4880
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 3 | a week ago | |
| 15 | a week ago | |
| 5 | a week ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|