|
POST
|
Yup; same issue. ESRI making arbitrary changes to scripts to try and make them "server safe" while actually breaking things is a horrible strategy. I have a "Idea" posted about this; take a look... Improved GP Tool Publishing - Approve Changes to scripts before publish
... View more
05-01-2024
11:35 AM
|
1
|
0
|
434
|
|
POST
|
Yes, honestly I am tracking several instances of the same scenario in my Staging and Production systems.
... View more
04-25-2024
11:59 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2398
|
|
IDEA
|
When publishing a GP tool (after a tool is run in ArcGIS Pro) to become a geoprocessing tool it is possible to see a major breaking issue. Recently we found that a shared path: "\\server\share\contentfolder\myDB.sde\myFeatureLayer" Was being mangled in the publication/conversion process. Pro is taking in these strings\paths and inferring in them that they need to be made "Server" friendly based on assumed needs. The above folder was being turned into: "%scratchworkspace%\\server\share\contentfolder\myDB.sde\myFeatureLayer" This then means that all connections/functions depending on these strings are now broken. The big issue we have is that this script/tool is now broken, and while the tool will publish the function will not work and will return a lovely 99999 error that the tool could not be executed. What we need is a way to review/approve the changes being made to a GP tool that is being published so that Pro is not making a change that in fact is not needed to happen and breaking the script in such a way that renders it inoperative. Troubleshooting and diagnosing this issue was complex, it required connecting to the ArcGIS-Config folder where it was published and running the script locally to the server to get to the "path not found" level issue from where the folder/string was changed.
... View more
04-16-2024
11:16 AM
|
1
|
0
|
498
|
|
POST
|
Just tagged my Rep to be attached; but good ENH request...
... View more
02-22-2024
09:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1002
|
|
POST
|
Yes that is the NEW workaround for the poor UX change that was made that directly impacts users. Poor UX consideration.
... View more
12-16-2023
12:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
689
|
|
IDEA
|
Yes, removing this ability has created loads of new work for no good and logical reason. Negatively impacting User-Experience should be avoided at all cost.
... View more
12-16-2023
12:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1182
|
|
POST
|
I am curious about who made the BONEHEADED decision to take away the ability to create Enterprise Database connections in folders outside of the "Project" folder? I have dozens of users who rely on shared connection docs (.sde) files, and while we can see the older/legacy files PRO will not open them, and you also can't create new ones. When you right click a folder and select the "New" sub-menu; Enterprise DB connections is gone. WHY???
... View more
12-15-2023
10:48 AM
|
0
|
2
|
801
|
|
POST
|
The Mapservices were in Server; but referenced in WebMaps on Portal; and that worked just fine.
... View more
12-01-2023
03:10 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2371
|
|
POST
|
I did the same thing; and it worked out pretty well. Only minor issues in some places with large services with Tile-Caches behind them; but overall worked out well.
... View more
12-01-2023
03:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2379
|
|
POST
|
You have to replace the service from ArcGIS Pro; you can't just drag/drop a APRX over the MXD; you have to publish/replace the service.
... View more
12-01-2023
02:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2436
|
|
POST
|
The Washington State Department of Revenue has a position for a GIS Data Management Specialist to join our team. The winning candidate will play a lead role in integrating data from City, County, State and Tribal Partners to further the mission for the State of Washington. https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/washington/jobs/4229478-0/geographic-information-systems-gis-data-management-specialist?
... View more
10-26-2023
09:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1087
|
|
POST
|
I agree with @AngusHooper1 , we did in-place upgrades for my entire platform (7 vms for DEV, 14 for STAGING, 18 for PRODUCTION) without issue. We went from Win2016 to 2019; will go to 2023 in the spring of next year. Don't go through the whole wipe/rebuild if you REALLY don't need too...
... View more
10-19-2023
06:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1508
|
|
POST
|
No quite, we need to be able to have a If/Else scenario. So if we hit the time-gate; then auto-approve.
... View more
09-19-2023
06:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
799
|
|
POST
|
When setting up a workflow that has a "Approval" question, how/can we put a time-gate on it. I am looking for if a Deny hasn't happened in 5 days that it auto-approves and the workflow continues.
... View more
09-07-2023
10:24 AM
|
0
|
2
|
853
|
|
POST
|
Hey @AdamCarnow there was mention of a link to the presentations from the Summit. Any idea when we will be able to get that? Was great seeing it in person, but my mind has been digesting so much I want to go back through the backing info...
... View more
07-18-2023
02:47 PM
|
1
|
1
|
3482
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saturday | |
| 1 | 11-14-2025 01:27 PM | |
| 1 | 03-13-2025 05:24 PM | |
| 2 | 05-29-2025 03:29 PM | |
| 1 | 04-09-2025 01:14 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Wednesday
|