Latest Contributions by DougBrowning

Not sure I am following but you would add a geopoint field inside the repeat. I think you can then give that a calculation of the geopoint outside the repeat. If that does not work you may need to add lat long fields and then calculate based on that.

Yes in Connect we use formulas in the Read only column on the regular. If I remember a calculation in there can get funky since it thinks the data cannot change so it does not always fire the calc. I don't use the web app much so I am not sure.

That is a tough one. I am not sure if read only works on a geopoint question? If it does I could see also passing in the lat long as string fields then check those fields in the read only for null. Note read only defaults to yes but you can add a formula there. So something like ${PassedinLat} != '' and ${PassedinLat} != '' If not this formula in the esri hidden column could work as that just hides the question. Or we have done stuff like Do you need to override the location? as a question and use that in read only.

The Arcade I posted above is just for display as you say but that is all I need it for. We have been using this method since before calculated expressions even existed. But what concerns me on changing is 1. Kicking off 32 calculated expressions could be a performance hit. 2. If anyone changes the parent layer then the children are now wrong. (that is why I dont calc much to other layers as it gets real tricky on changes). Overall though if {relationships/0/FieldName} works in a browser then it should work in Field Maps. The fact its been a known issue for pushing 8 years I think is kinda crazy. Related tables really need to be better supported in general. Its just a key database concept. thanks

Ok they say to change to integer but that did not work for me. So you have position() in there? If so in Connect let the form open for a bit and see if you get this in the top corner. Note you must have the latest 123 to see this. For me I had to go back to the old school way. Have a field with just a calc of 1 then use once(count(field)) instead.

Seeing this same issue 3 years later. We want to lock down editing so that the users make changes in the 123 form instead. I was able to lock it down in forms by adding one Note type field with this message. Leaving all other fields out and it works ok. But then if they use Edit Multiple all the fields are open again. I cannot lock down all editing as we need it available for the 123 form. They can also just edit right there in the attribute table which I can not seem to turn off either. Would love to see edit multiple respect the forms. thanks

{relationships/0/FieldName} syntax is not working in Field Maps popup but works in the web map. This was an issue back in the old map viewer for many, many years. I talked to @JeffShaner about it a few times but it was punted to the new map viewer. It still seems to not work. I am testing moving to the new map viewer for our field projects. Currently I must use 32 Arcade expressions with FeatureSet just to look up attributes from the parent that I then use in Survey123 Launch URLs. DesignLat {expression/expr6} var tbl = FeatureSetByRelationshipName($feature, "Points", ['DesignLat'], false); return First(tbl).DesignLat Then arcgis-survey123://?itemID=87ef1194dac&field:PointID={PointID}&field:DesignLat={expression/expr6} In the popup I can add related fields using the syntax {relationships/0/FieldName} and it does work great in the browser and my URLs form properly arcgis-survey123://?itemID=1b2594e&field:PointID={PointID}&field:CollectTurbidity={relationships/0/CollectTurbidity} But in Field Maps it is not giving me any values for {relationships/0/CollectTurbidity} so my URL looks like arcgis-survey123://?itemID=1b2594e&field:PointID=SomethingID&field:CollectTurbidity= which means nothing is getting passed. Is there some other syntax here to grab the related fields? I am not seeing anything that says this does not work. Is it a bug, not supported, or is there any timeline here? It would be so nice not to have to manually add 32 Arcade expressions by hand. thanks

Do you have nested repeats or using position? This happened to me https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/latest-updates-cause-forms-with-nested-repeats-to/m-p/1172432 I am not sure its your URL, could something with the form. I have never once had to encode a URL. I tend to use static URLs and not use Arcade except for fields to pass. Not sure this is it but thought I would post just in case.

Check out this post https://resource.esriuk.com/blog/getting-started-with-url-parameters-in-survey123/https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/integrating-survey123-with-field-maps-using-quot/td-p/1296723 But it looks like this arcgis-survey123://?itemID=36ff9e8c13e042a58cfce4ad87f55d19&field:surname=Klauser&center=37.8199,-122.4783,20 Also here for Arcade https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/integrating-survey123-with-field-maps-using-quot/td-p/1296723

You can make a dummy 123 form linked to the Field Maps layer and then use all of its reporting tools. More modern option would be a Dashboard. We made a photo review dashboard and its so much easier then tracking down a pile of PDF files. Been a huge hit. Also nice to open original size images as PDF will down sample them. You can also make something with Python and/or Data Driven pages in Pro. Hope that helps

Oh so the question the relevant is based on is also a pulldata? I could see how this would always a string-length > 7 then since that pulldata is in fact a string bigger than 7. How would the form know the difference? Hmm well one idea is try != to pulldata(stuff) and test that. That may then only be relevant if it has a value. Next idea is create a manual field for the user that is something like "lookup the id now?" with a yes/no. Then use that for the relevant. Extra tap but the bonus is the user can not fire the pulldata if the signal is weak. They could also toggle it to have it refire if the signal improves or it fails. Just some ideas

Could you post what Question A looks like? Hard to tell why the relevant is not right without it. I am also wondering if calculate is not respecting the relevant due to its type. I would also test setting the type to text and then set the appearance to hidden instead. That may then respect the relevant.

I am not sure if default can do this but you could try it. You would use a concat with '\n' as the separator to give you a new line. If default does not go then you can use calculation but it gets funky since it will add a refresh button and if the user taps it, then what they entered will get wiped. Set it up and test thoroughly.

No it cannot be done. You can use repeat_count and it will create exactly 3 but pretty sure it will not populate the values of all 3 repeats at once unless the user navigates through all 3. You can test it.

You need "" around the URL when moving to calculation. I attached a sample before.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Friday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DougBrowning

Re: Survey123 Repeats and Geopoint

Re: Expression To Add Survey123 Point Data to Field List

Re: Expression To Add Survey123 Point Data to Field List

Re: {relationships/0/FieldName} not working in Field Maps popup but works in the web map

Re: URL parameter does not work with a particular survey

Re: Field Maps Form not used when editing multiple features

{relationships/0/FieldName} not working in Field Maps popup but works in the web map

Re: URL parameter does not work with a particular survey

Re: Expression To Add Survey123 Point Data to Field List

Re: Exporting pictures with data from Field Map to an individual PDF

Re: Pulldata() calculation triggering when it's not supposed to causing app hang

Re: Pulldata() calculation triggering when it's not supposed to causing app hang

Re: Prefilled Multiline Text - Survey123 Connect

Re: Populate child repeats automatically

Re: Pull Functionality using a service layer

Re: Can the Temporal Profile chart on the Multidim...

Re: Constraints Aren't Working For Large Text Fiel...

Re: Can the Temporal Profile chart on the Multidim...

Re: Auto compute date of departure based on no. of...

Re: Expression To Add Survey123 Point Data to Fiel...