POST
|
Hi Eric, I was searching to know how exactly the (ArcGIS) software back-transforms log-normalized data into the original scale. I am particularly interested in how this is handled in EBK, in case it's handled differently in other models. Please, can you explain to the extent possible? Thanks Elijah
... View more
01-04-2023
01:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
963
|
POST
|
Thanks Johaness. I will try to see how to manage the codes. I appreciate.
... View more
05-04-2022
02:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
930
|
POST
|
I have many rasters: The task is to slice each of the rasters into different value ranges (e.g, 0 -8, 8.0 -12 & 12.0 -15) and calculate the area of each slice. Somehow, I am not python-wise yet. Being a repetitive process I guess python will come in here. Any help in this regard would be appreciated as I can't imagine doing this manually for all the raster. Thank you.
... View more
05-04-2022
01:27 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1000
|
POST
|
@Scott, EBK or EBK regression prediction typically outperforms other interpolation techniques, may be, apart from some other ML techniques. However, EBK and EBKRP can't work here using ArcGIS since I guess the minimum number of samples it can handle is 20. If you have covariates with noise, you can try co-kriging since. Adding covariates may help improve the prediction. If not, advise from SteveLynch is most appropriate. Try as many as may appear reasonable, than compare the error stats.
... View more
04-19-2022
04:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1209
|
POST
|
Hi @ Eric, Your explanation makes sense to me. I didn't quite grasp this before now. Many thanks. Elijah.
... View more
04-19-2022
04:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1009
|
POST
|
Hi@Eric I am referring to the highlighted portion of the attached document being some of your comments in response to a cross validation question. I am not able to wrap my head around it yet. Could you please elucidate perhaps with an example? For instance, how does the cross-validated prediction and the final interpolated prediction differ. Cross validation conceptually removes a measured point and purports to predict that same value using all other points. Then the difference between the predicted and the measured is calculated which is the error. I can only understand "one" prediction here which, in my view, is the final prediction. How come we have "cross validated prediction" and "final interpolated prediction". Please, explain.
... View more
04-14-2022
07:14 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1107
|
POST
|
The image is a view of EBKRP cross validation output.
... View more
03-08-2022
06:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
720
|
POST
|
I need to copy a map legend from ArcGIS Pro 2.9, of course from the layout view. I need to copy and paste it on MS word, but it's not working even though the functionality seems to be there. I also tried using the 'capture to clipboard' but this captures everything in the lay out view. Please, can you point me to a solution? I dont want to snipe it since the quality of the graphs fades. Thank you.
... View more
12-06-2021
12:18 AM
|
0
|
2
|
603
|
POST
|
I want to assess the impact of sampling density on the accuracy of interpolation using a particular interpolation method. The idea is to sample at different resolutions (grid-based), for example, 1 sample per 2kmx2km grid, 3kmx3km grid , 1 sample per 5kmx5km grid, etc. These sample points would be extracted from existing interpolated grid at the various sampling densities. The question is this: Given the fact that the supposed observed data (samples extracted from existing interpolated grid) are indeed interpolated, what possible impact may it have on the result of this study. Note that, the intent is to assess the interpolation accuracy using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Error (ME), etc. Thanks,
... View more
11-26-2021
09:52 AM
|
0
|
2
|
856
|
POST
|
Dear Eric, Again, I quite appreciate your answers. I need a few more insight if possible. You have well-dealt with possible number of samples implied by 'small'. However, knowing that the number of samples is not linearly related to sampling density, is there anything specifically advantageous about using EBKRP, for instance, in low sampling density scenarios? Generally, interpolation accuracies are affected by the sampling density and distribution. I will like to know if, perhaps by means of estimating the semi-variogram through the process of sub-setting and repeated simulations, EBKRP can achieve better result than other kriging models, in low sampling density setting. The whole idea is to say or not, that, in a data-scarce (sparse) / low density sampling situation setting (not necessarily small number of samples), EBKRP will perform better than other kriging models, based on its intrinsic characteristics. Thanks in advance.
... View more
11-17-2021
07:27 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2446
|
POST
|
Hi Eric, Your answer is very much appreciated. Many thanks.
... View more
11-16-2021
04:44 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2455
|
POST
|
Hi Dan, Thanks for your reply. Yes, I mean the last 2 bullet points contained in the 'Advantages of Empirical Bayesian Kriging' as found here https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/geostatistical-analyst/what-is-empirical-bayesian-kriging-.htm . I am particularly interested in understanding what is referred to 'as small data set' and how EBK is more accurate than other kriging options when using 'small data sets'. How small is small, for example? Perhaps, looking at sampling density, etc?. It will be good to see (case) studies proving EBK's superior performance in a 'small data set' setting. I am just curious. I can't yet see such articles or demonstrations yet. Thanks a lot
... View more
11-13-2021
01:42 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2479
|
POST
|
I am trying to understand these descriptions below of EBK/EBKRP. In particular I need to understand what is meant by 'small data sets' here. Does it give any idea of how well EBK performs under different sampling densities, etc? ........EBKRP manages to achieve better accuracy than other kriging techniques both for small datasets and even when data is locally moderately non-stationary (Krivoruchko, 2012). ........EBKRP have shown that the prediction intervals obtained by EBK have good coverage probabilities when the data variation is changing rapidly and dissimilarly in different parts of the data extent (Gribov and Krivoruchko 2020).
... View more
11-12-2021
04:28 PM
|
0
|
7
|
2524
|
POST
|
I used EBK Regression Prediction @Geostatistical Analyst Pro 2.8 to predict air pollution parameter using 5 explanatory rasters. One of the rasters was an Euclidean distance raster based on distance from a road feature. All the samples were taken along the road feature. The prediction result completely followed the road feature, which is fine, in my view, because I was estimating CO concentration along the road. This of course resulted to a high standard error in areas away from the road. Again, this is expected since sampling wasn't done outside the road feature/line. But I wanted to find out how the road raster was weighted (prioritized) such that it had the highest weight (presumably) to determine the configuration of the prediction map? I have attached a sample map for your view.
... View more
10-31-2021
05:46 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1653
|
POST
|
This is an important issue. It is widely regarded that there is no significant difference between the 2 sensors in what the NDVIs should be given your context. However, research result in this area is not very consistent. Having said that, some factor that may complicate matters are the projection and preprocessing. You may need to be sure that these preprocessing follows same procedure and projections are accurate. I have dropped below comments from this source which I think may help your decision in this regard. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-it-possible-to-have-NDVI-equivalence-between-images-from-Landsat-5-and-Landsat-8
... View more
09-10-2021
09:39 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2130
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 02-28-2019 02:18 AM | |
1 | 09-10-2021 09:39 AM | |
1 | 05-16-2021 12:18 AM | |
2 | 03-18-2021 07:35 AM | |
1 | 04-15-2018 12:01 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-19-2024
11:33 AM
|