|
POST
|
At least you know you can pull off 300 edits at once. I can never count on anything when calculating to hosted feature services. Sometimes it gets through 50 features, sometimes all 11,000 of them. So, since there is no real reliable way to accomplish this, I have converted to python script for this, makes a list of all the features that need calculation, then starts processing the features in the list. If sucsessful, it adds to a "completed" list. Then, if/when the scirpt 504's on me, my try/except: block re-runs the calculations if feature not in completed list. This way, it will always finish the task. Might take 20 minutes, might take 2 hours, but will eventually get there. R_
... View more
04-17-2023
09:06 AM
|
3
|
0
|
10534
|
|
POST
|
I have now tested this with 2.9.3 and 3.1.1 and both work the same way. If I delete "labelClasses": through "labelVisibility": True, (and everything in between), it will just apply the symbology from the layer file, and not the labeling. If I modify the "expression" : "$feature.LABELFIELD", then load the layer file, it will label with that field instead of the original. RhettZufelt_0-1681743739514.png R_
... View more
04-17-2023
08:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2281
|
|
POST
|
Rather than "importing" you can loop through your list of shapefiles and feed that to arcpy.conversion.FeatureClassToFeatureClass to the appropriate feature dataset. R_
... View more
04-13-2023
10:13 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2399
|
|
POST
|
I was able to delete the LabelCLasses and labelVisibility from the lyrx file, then import symbology and only the symbology came across with no labeling or label issues. Was also able to edit the lyrx file and change the LabelClasses expression to use a different column for labeling, then import and updates symbology and modified label column. "labelClasses" : [
{
"type" : "CIMLabelClass",
"expressionTitle" : "Custom",
"expression" : "$feature.Pr_Class",
"expressionEngine" : "Arcade",............. R_
... View more
04-13-2023
09:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2294
|
|
POST
|
That is set on the hosted feature layer, not in the form. view item details for the Hosted Feature service, Overview Tab, select the Test Collection April23 layer, turn on attachments. You will then be able to add attachments to features in Field Maps. RhettZufelt_0-1681241682072.png RhettZufelt_1-1681241698222.png R_
... View more
04-11-2023
12:35 PM
|
3
|
0
|
7506
|
|
POST
|
Depending on how complex it is, another option would be to just calculate the values in the form for the remaining fields based on what is chosen for UniqueID. R_
... View more
04-11-2023
08:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3173
|
|
POST
|
I think this is what you are looking for. RhettZufelt_0-1681164834926.png R_
... View more
04-10-2023
03:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
687
|
|
POST
|
Might try the DATEADD function. start_time > DATEADD(day,-1,CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) R_
... View more
04-07-2023
10:31 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1754
|
|
POST
|
In 2.9.3 it is in the options menu below BIM (as in screenshot above). Don't have 2.9.2 to check, but noticed it is no longer there in 3.1. 3.1 seems to just add the .dwg layers without converting. R_
... View more
04-07-2023
10:16 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3195
|
|
POST
|
Guess I should have read the original post closer. Thought you were dealing with ALL the entities being converted, not just ALL the line "LAYER"s. If you tell it not to convert to feature class in options, it doesn't take near as long as it loads the CAD data from .dwg but doesn't convert it to feature class. Then you could r-click and export the layer desired with all the lines to feature class. RhettZufelt_0-1680884616829.png Rather than dealing with this, I have a separate Pro project (so that it always uses the same default FGDB) that I open the CAD data in, then, use Feature class to Feature class to convert the polylines. This allows me to use an expression to export only the desired layers to a FGDB feature class. An added advantage of doing it this way is that I never have to actually load the .dwg into the Pro project and bog it down. R_
... View more
04-07-2023
09:30 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3202
|
|
POST
|
If you "drill" into the .dwg and only add the polyline layer, it only converts the polylines to GIS and doesn't create all the other layers in the .dwg. RhettZufelt_0-1680882316447.png R_
... View more
04-07-2023
08:45 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3213
|
|
POST
|
Did you look on the organization page and look at that members profile to ensure that their current email is set in their profile?
... View more
04-06-2023
02:07 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2052
|
|
POST
|
I am creating a Field Maps map/form to collect road hazard data. Each hazard type will have it's own "list" of available descriptions. I have set this up with SubTypes and a separate description domain for each subtype. On a separate dataset, I have also created Contingent Values with field groups limiting the available descriptions based on hazard type. Both seem to behave similar in Field Maps, and limit the availalble options based on the hazard selected. One difference, with the SubTypes, ONLY the values from that hazard type domain show as available options, with the contingent values, it shows the 'limited' list as recommended, then the rest of the values from the domain show up under "Other". I am trying to figure out the most 'stable/effective' way to accomplish this, both seem to do the job I'm interested in. Does anyone have any experience using these two methods in Field Maps app? I am curious if there are any suggestions one way or the other? Have you had "issues" with one method, not the other, etc? Thanks for any insight/advice, R_
... View more
04-04-2023
11:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1162
|
|
POST
|
If you are signed into your account AND open a web map that is online, you will see your default basemaps. Seems that if I "download" a mmpk, only the sideloaded basemaps are available. R_
... View more
04-04-2023
07:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1179
|
|
POST
|
That is the way Generate list seems to work. If you wanted different codes vs domains, you would need to edit them. However, if you shared that data from Pro, it should have the same Domain/List in AGOL as well as Pro unless it was deleted in the items detail page in AGOL. In your attached photo, are you sure that the "Asset Offline" data is the same Hosted feature layer loaded in through the portal link in Catalog and not a "local" feature class somewhere? It appears as if you are showing domains for two different datasets. In either case, ESRI has alwasy been kind of flaky with Domains. Some software/services/apps will honor the show description/code, other do not. And, this seems to randomly change as well. For this reason, I usually make my Code and Descr. the same so it "always" displays as expected. R_
... View more
04-03-2023
12:13 PM
|
1
|
2
|
2482
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-14-2026 04:00 PM | |
| 1 | 09-14-2022 07:53 AM | |
| 1 | 09-14-2022 08:23 AM | |
| 1 | 05-21-2026 08:53 AM | |
| 1 | 05-14-2026 04:28 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Wednesday
|