Latest Contributions by AlixVezina

Hi @BrandonGuo , Thanks for posting! Would you by chance be able to share the two web scenes you are using, and how you have configured the Elevation Profile widget for them?  I'm trying to also observe the issue from my end so we can resolve it. Thank you! ... View more

@AdélaïdeSautreuil , thank you for posting your idea! The team is no longer making enhancements to Web AppBuilder at this time and we recommend using Experience Builder moving forward to build your web apps.  In Experience Builder, you can customize the selection highlight color for selected polygon features from the Map widget settings. ... View more

Hi  @SaraWazir , I usually see this kind of issue when the value that was written into the field originally (maybe, for example, values were typed into the field before the domain was actually created?) and do not match the domain code. You may need to recalculate your field values by category and make sure you are writing in the domain code rather than the description.   ... View more

In my map I display a map service with many layers, points, lines, and polygons. The Select tool works fine selecting points and polygons but it will not select the lines (i.e. roads) on my map.  This does sounds like a bug. I have a map service with point, line and polygon features, and I am able to select across all shape types.  Are you able to share the service where you are seeing the issue?  ... View more

Hi @West-d-gis , setting up the actions in reverse should also work in Experience Builder > with the selected related record filtering features from the parent layer!     ... View more

Hi @MariaNuñezReyes , Which version of Enterprise and/or Experience Builder developer edition are you using. If you have a fairly recent version, you should be able to leverage the export data action within Experience Builder to extract features selected by the Trace widget. Is this something you've already explored? ... View more

@ConorFlynn  Instead of multiple maps/apps, I think we could also add multiple view layers on the same map to allow configuring different forms. Yes, I think that could work too!! Let us know how you go! 😊 ... View more

Hi @ConorFlynn, I think providing field customizations for Batch editing at the widget level is under consideration. The recommended approach for customizing your editing experience remains to configure editing Forms for your editable layers. See: Configure forms for attribute editing (Map Viewer)—ArcGIS Online Help | Documentation Since it is possible to create different Forms for a same layer in different maps, I suggest creating a map tailored to your Batch editing workflows and customizing a Form for batch editing. Just a quick example to illustrate what I mean:       ... View more

Hi @West-d-gis , Related data is recognized within the Experience Builder data sources. When you configure Message actions between widgets, you can set Filter records. For example with the configuration below, when a Tree feature will be selected, it's related table records will also be selected. This is available in ArcGIS Online and starting at Enteprise 11.4. ... View more

@Amanda__Huber , "Allow you to also batch edit from feature layers and also table layer that are added to your app but not necessarily also in your map." When configuring the Edit widget, you will find two modes are available: Interact with a Map widget - the Edit widget will only read the feature layers from the maps in a Map widget for editing. This is similar to what was available in the Batch Attribute Editor widget in Web AppBuilder, where a map was always required in your app for the widgets to work. This newly introduced batch editing option in the Edit widget allows editing the feature's attributes and also their geometries. This was the main workflow the Experience Builder team was focused on supporting for batch editing in this initial release of the functionality. Attribute only - you can connect the Edit widget to any editable layers in your app, may they be in a map or not. This option only allows you to edit the attributes for features (in a feature layer) and records (in a table layer) - it does not allow you to edit geometries in the map. Technically, with this option, you could build an app with only a Table and the Edit widget and no map at all (example below). This is a new type of workflow that we did not previously support in Web AppBuilder. The team will add support for batch editing in this case too, in a future release, so you'll get the new ability to also batch edit records from a table layer. I hope this all makes sense! 😊   ... View more

Hi @Tiff , Select by attributes functionality is available via the Select widget. As far as I am aware, there aren't any plans to introduce select by attributes within the Edit widget itself and it will remain a workflow outside of the Edit widget as part of the Select widget. If you have any enhancement requests for the Select widget itself, please let us know!   For your second suggestion, I think a "Select all" data action in the Table widget is a great idea. I'll see if this is something the team has on their radar! ... View more

Hi all, For attribute only editing, you still have the ability to customize the editing capabilities for each layer in the map. Make sure you only allow for Update records > Attribute in the layer's capabilities. Example below:   In Web AppBuilder, the Batch Attribute Editing widget only supported being connected to editable feature layers from your map and did not support editing records from standalone layers and table layers.  Once implemented, support for batch editing in the "Attribute only" mode is an enhancement in Experience Builder that will allow you to also batch edit from feature layers and also table layer that are added to your app but not necessarily also in your map. ... View more

@ConorFlynn Thank you for pointing this out. Unfortunately, there isn't a "Partially implemented" status option we can use. 😔 The team is working on also supporting Attribute only mode and we'll keep you all posted once we have a clear timeline for it. ... View more