|
POST
|
I was hoping to see something on this too. Ideally, I would like to have a rolling average per day as a guide line on the bar graph. However, I would even be willing to settle for an indicator with that number.
... View more
10-28-2020
09:23 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1107
|
|
POST
|
I'm on board with this idea as well. We are in the early phases of using workforce. Our on-call crews will likely be dispatched from mobile devices. It would be nice to do that within the app.
... View more
07-13-2020
05:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1234
|
|
POST
|
We have lots of editors editing inspection data, leak survey data, break data, etc. We do this all with a combination of AGOL and ArcGIS Server. We only have 2 editors editing the network data (sewer mains, gas mains, water mains, etc.). For the very far foreseeable future, that will will be it as far as editing that data. We really don't want anyone else getting into editing the assets. The method we have now works great. I prefer working with AGOL vs Portal. We already have our 55 users on that. I like that ESRI maintains the upgrades for that. I already have to upgrade enough software. I'm not interested in adding anything else to that. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to move forward with Pro. I use it as much as I can now. However, if in a few years, or whenever that day ArcMap dies, I'd like to be able to move forward without installing and maintaining an entire additional set of software.
... View more
02-21-2019
10:40 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4968
|
|
POST
|
So the when the field worker closed the app out completely (swiped up and closed it out), then reloaded the entire application, the points would show up. They did not have to resubmit the points. The initial collection was being stored in the database, but was just not visible on the map. Since then, I removed the feature service from the map, and then added it back. Now everything seems to be working fine.
... View more
01-31-2019
08:36 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2115
|
|
POST
|
We're running somewhat of a hybrid system with ArcGIS Server and AGOL right now. So right now, we have a couple of folks editing our geometric network. Some of our data is stored in AGOL. I'm not sure that the single user network support through Pro would suffice. We literally only have 2 users editing features in the geometric network (although I'd love the ability for multiuser editing of related tables within the geometric network), so I really don't want to mess with installing and maintaining Portal, just for 2 users. It's a bit worrisome that there isn't a defined plan in place for those of us in this situation. In order to plan long term, I hope that there will be a clearer road map for us in the near future. There seems to be quite the push to move folks to Pro. I'm curious as to what the adoption rate of the utility network is within the utility field is. We could be in the minority when it comes to this, but I've spoken with others in the same boat as us. I really hope that at the very least, as ArcMap is phased out, we have a comparable system with Pro as we do now. Thanks.
... View more
01-30-2019
06:35 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4968
|
|
POST
|
Will it ever be possible to use the utility network without installing and maintaining Portal? Initially, the idea was to bring the geometric network to Pro...that didn't work, so the utility network was created. Then I was told that it would be released to Portal first, with the plan of being available via AGOL at a later date. Now, I'm hearing that it will never be fully integrated with AGOL. Is that true? If so, does that mean that in order to have that network connectivity that a geometric network allows, all utilities will have to install and maintain Portal? What does that do to small utilities that don't have the infrastructure for that? I really wouldn't mind using Pro more often, but it seems like for those of us in the utility field, outside of using portal, we've kind of been left behind. At some point, arcmap will be a thing of the past. That day worries me quite a bit.
... View more
01-25-2019
06:42 AM
|
3
|
11
|
7122
|
|
POST
|
We've also experienced this. This happens occasionally, while adding a point. The point feature is stored on our arcgis server in a postgresql database. It's shared out as a feature service. We haven't seen this issue at all in the old collector app, just the new one. We have found that if you close the program out and reopen (this may also work with just reloading), the point shows back up. So ours also remain intact, but renders the program somewhat useless.
... View more
01-11-2019
11:55 AM
|
3
|
0
|
2115
|
|
POST
|
Yes...and I have...but in doing a search, I found this...which appears to be a similar issue, albeit a different program.
... View more
01-11-2019
11:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1865
|
|
POST
|
I know this is an older post, but we are having the same issue within the newest collector app while using iPads.
... View more
01-09-2019
01:12 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1865
|
|
IDEA
|
Also on board with this idea. We've had users get married (or the other way around). Changing the user name would be easier than recreating everything.
... View more
01-09-2019
09:32 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6508
|
|
POST
|
We are slowly deploying the new collector app to all of our crews. One of the crews is having a sporadic issue where the iPad will require compass calibration. It doesn't happen every day, but he said on days it does occur, that it happens often. The internal GPS is turned on, but he manually drops the points anyway. We have 2 other crews that use an external GPS with the newer version of collector and they haven't had a problem. I've uninstalled/reinstalled the app on his device, with the same results. Just trying to figure out if this is something triggered by the app, or if we have an issue with the iPad itself. Thanks, Robb
... View more
01-04-2019
12:50 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1044
|
|
POST
|
Just installed the 17.1.2 beta....looks like all of the issues that we had with the original are working now. I'm looking forward to this getting to the app store soon!
... View more
08-14-2017
01:03 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1109
|
|
BLOG
|
Is there a way to create a query definition like in the windows app? If not, is this something that is planned?
... View more
08-09-2017
12:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2432
|
|
POST
|
Are you searching numerical fields? Most of our searches are on GIS IDs for our features that are all integer fields. None of them seem to have the behavior that you are describing. I did find that for the couple of fields that are text based, we are also getting the same results as you are. What about your field values...are they populating? Some seem to work, while others don't. Fields that are auto-created when you enable editor tracking seem to work. Most, however, do not populate (searches do not work on these). I thought it had something to do with the field alias issue, but that doesn't seem to hold true, because I have fields that follow that rule, but do not populate. I really wish they would just re-release the older, working version. It's been 3 weeks now and it still doesn't look like a permanent, working fix is coming out soon.
... View more
07-31-2017
08:58 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1024
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-28-2024 01:03 PM | |
| 4 | 06-26-2024 07:55 PM | |
| 1 | 03-04-2024 08:21 AM | |
| 1 | 07-13-2020 05:43 PM | |
| 1 | 03-31-2022 08:30 AM |