|
POST
|
Hello Kristina, We have a tentative ETA for this ability which is later this year. However, as I mentioned in my reply to Michael, we'd still only permit 1 worker to be associated with a work assignment. Craig
... View more
07-25-2017
08:18 AM
|
1
|
3
|
4673
|
|
POST
|
Hi Glen, I tried to reproduce this but wasn't able to; are you referring to the Filter text box at the top of the Assignment List? Or the Search command on the Map? thanks,
... View more
07-19-2017
11:39 AM
|
0
|
1
|
926
|
|
POST
|
Anthony, We'll be providing the ability to only specify those two fields to pass information from Workforce to Survey123/Collector. Those are the fields most requested by users. That doesn't mean we won't consider expanding the list in future releases to allow other fields. If you have use cases / examples where passing the other field information would be useful, please let us know. Craig
... View more
07-19-2017
06:05 AM
|
0
|
3
|
3683
|
|
POST
|
Glen, Ross, This is actually an issue with Workforce; we'll be updating our whitelist for Explorer in the next release of Workforce; late July / early August. Craig
... View more
07-18-2017
09:32 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1611
|
|
POST
|
Hi Colin, Yes, we're working on this now for a late July / early August release. We'll provide the ability to pass the Work Order ID and/or Location text to Survey123 and Collector (when Collector is updated to support it) Craig
... View more
07-18-2017
05:12 AM
|
1
|
12
|
3683
|
|
POST
|
Michael, Thanks for the additional information; this helps, I've added it to our issue. I think the workflow would be satisfied by what we're discussing for a future release; however, we'd still only permit 1 worker to be associated with a work assignment. Are the workers performing the same type of work? Are they performing related, but dependent work (i.e., Worker A must complete their work prior to Worker B)? Craig
... View more
07-18-2017
04:52 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4673
|
|
POST
|
Hi Phillip, We're currently working on this and are targeting late July / Early August for the release. Craig
... View more
07-17-2017
02:26 PM
|
0
|
8
|
2590
|
|
POST
|
Hi Michael, Thanks for you question on Workforce. You're correct, the typical use case for Workforce involves sending an assignment to a particular worker. Workforce does not currently support associating assignments with more than 1 worker, but it is something that is in our Backlog, I've added your request to the issue. There are some ways to approach this in Workforce today for certain use cases; they may apply to yours, are you able to go into any more detail on your use case? thanks, Craig
... View more
07-17-2017
06:58 AM
|
0
|
4
|
4673
|
|
POST
|
Hi Charlotte, Yes, you could use Geoforms to populate the assignments in a Workforce Project. Since the assignments are stored in a feature service, they can be edited and added to from any application that can edit a feature service. If you are going to use Geoforms to populate/add assignments to the feature service, there's a few things to be aware of: - The Workforce Web application ensures that assignments are created with the correct information; i.e. a shape and assignment type and that the other values for an assignment are also correct. By doing this through Geoforms, you would be taking responsibility for this; take a look at this doc topic for more information: Workforce schema—Workforce for ArcGIS | ArcGIS - Duplicates and QA of assignments - make sure you have a handle on duplicates that may get created and the QA of assignments; e.g. you may have multiple users reporting the same issue and each of them would create an assignment; which would lead to duplicates. Craig
... View more
07-08-2017
09:28 AM
|
2
|
2
|
1233
|
|
POST
|
Glen, I sent an email to you on this. Can you also get a Support incident created so that they can dig into the issue to try and determine the cause? Can can continue to track the issue here or we can cover it through email. thanks,
... View more
06-15-2017
10:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
726
|
|
POST
|
Hi Kevin I assume by your questions that the above needs to be enabled in order to configure the dispatch and mobile workers maps via workforce project? No, it isn't necessary - it looks like something else is going on. Let's take this offline so we can dig into it further; can you DM your email? April, if you'd also like to investigate this further, please DM me your email.
... View more
05-18-2017
08:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2365
|
|
POST
|
Kevin, April, Can you answer a few questions so I can make sure we have the right repro case to look at this issue? Can you confirm if your organization settings have "Allow access to the organization through HTTPS only." enabled? Are you using the http or https protocol when opening Workforce? thanks,
... View more
05-17-2017
02:24 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2365
|
|
POST
|
Hi Phillip, Workforce does not provide the ability for a Dispatcher to open Survey123 (or the other App Integrations). I haven't heard of this request before; can you provide some information on the use case for it? thanks, Craig
... View more
05-15-2017
01:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
862
|
|
POST
|
Hello, This is a known issue and something we have in our backlog. If you'd like to track the issue, I suggest contacting Support so they can provide you with a tracking number. Craig
... View more
05-09-2017
02:04 PM
|
2
|
0
|
675
|
|
POST
|
Kevin, I just went through the same steps are you described: - With a tracks feature service that I own, in the My Contents view, I clicked the dropdown arrow next to it and chose "Add layer to new map" - In the map, I configured the pop-up and made sure the 4 editor tracking fields were checked on for Display - I selected the Creation Date field - When I click on the dropdown next to the Date, it displays the list of available Date options. You shouldn't be able to type in the Format droplist; but you should be able to click the dropdown arrow. If you can confirm the dropdown arrow cannot be clicked; then we'll need to take this offline to figure out how to proceed. thanks, Craig
... View more
05-04-2017
09:42 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3528
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Wednesday
|