|
POST
|
The Data Interoperability extension has a couple of functions for this use case, the ChangeDetector and Matcher transformers. The former identifies added, deleted and unchanged features between two datasets, the latter finds matching features. Both allow you to choose the combination of geometry and attribute tests you need. If you can share your data I can build a sample, either in this thread or via email. I would need to know your preference of 10.5 or Pro 1.4.1 tool version.
... View more
03-27-2017
07:35 AM
|
0
|
4
|
8455
|
|
POST
|
Hi, do you mean this sample? http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e57a7f9b15de428ea33c62e00bfb2332 That is hard coded to expect a geocode service as it leverages the available service count on a Server. To work similarly on a local machine you can use this sample: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b3c7c6273ef54e91aa57a073aa873eca The MMPK locator for Pro should work. Regards
... View more
03-22-2017
09:11 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1060
|
|
POST
|
Hello All I am regularly asked how to extract the tabular data visible in KML description balloons in ArcGIS Earth into properly typed attributes that can be written to a Geodatabase feature class. While KML does support a schema object that Data Interoperabilty's Quick Import geoprocessing tool would see and honour, often KML files are received that contain only HTML data in description objects, and the data is frustratingly close but inaccessible. Data Interoperability is still the answer, but you need to author a Spatial ETL tool tailored to your data. First, inspect the KML features in Earth and decide what attributes you want and what data type they are. Unfortunately there is no magic wand to wave to help with this, the data is untyped in the KML description and you need to do this clerical review. Usually only one Placemark geometry type is of interest, but if you need to convert multiple Placemark geometry types repeat the review for each one. Then author a Spatial ETL tool with KML Reader and Geodatabase Writer, manually specifying each output feature class' geometry and attributes. The data workflow between the Reader and Writer is this: How to expose feature attributes from KML tag - FME Knowledge Center You may need a GeometryFilter transformer after the Reader to filter Placemarks of interest, and if handling date fields, a DateFormatter to make the values writable to Geodatabase (say %x input, FME date output). The attributes you expose will then be written as properly typed fields in a Geodatabase. There is a related workflow to extract attributes from extended data - if anyone needs this message me in GeoNet.
... View more
03-03-2017
09:50 AM
|
0
|
9
|
43816
|
|
POST
|
Hello Michael Data Interoperability extension can help you, use a shapefile reader with a directory input and wildcard "*" and write to a single geodatabase feature class. If you can share data I can give you a sample tool. You can obtain an evaluation license of Data Interoperability.
... View more
02-23-2017
12:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1630
|
|
POST
|
See if the Tabulate Intersection tool will give you what you need.
... View more
02-22-2017
09:42 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4522
|
|
POST
|
Chris, the spatial adjustment experience in ArcMap is "on the list" for Pro, but in the meantime the conflation tools you mention are available.
... View more
02-21-2017
10:11 AM
|
0
|
3
|
5865
|
|
POST
|
Well if you have any 3rd party extensions you may need to update those but in theory everything else should work. Regards
... View more
01-26-2017
11:42 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2044
|
|
POST
|
Yes certainly, provided the computer meets system requirements. You mean Pro 1.4 though.
... View more
01-26-2017
09:42 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2044
|
|
POST
|
Yes, you can do that; we don't test it much but we think it 'should work' for Desktop workflows. I'm not sure what the official support position will be, probably unsupported.
... View more
01-26-2017
07:08 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2044
|
|
IDEA
|
I have used Vincenty distance from a Python module, see this sample for Pro: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=da9efbe1232f426ead182213f53c8cd8
... View more
01-26-2017
06:49 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3835
|
|
POST
|
My apologies, the latest style supports subaddresses better than earlier releases, there was a substantial rewrite. If possible, use the USAddress.lot.xml file that ships with ArcGIS Pro 1.4.
... View more
01-25-2017
02:03 PM
|
0
|
7
|
2265
|
|
POST
|
Hi Gabi There is a geoprocessing tool named Standardize Addresses in the system toolbox Geocoding Tools.tbx. Its behavior with the style (i.e USAddress.lot.xml file) that ships with Desktop is indeed driven by the xml section you mention, but a far more predictable result is obtained by using the Geocode Addresses geoprocessing tool with a locator you build from your reference data. I used a locator that we productize for the USA (Streetmap Premium), its latest release is the one I mentioned, Release 3 2016. In ArcGIS 10.5 the USA locator style supports subaddressing too, like apartments. If you go down the path of customizing a locator style there will likely always be a percentage of addresses where some ambiguous element is pulled into a prefix or suffix type or direction when you use Standardize Addresses
... View more
01-25-2017
01:32 PM
|
1
|
9
|
2265
|
|
POST
|
Hello Gabi If you geocode your addresses then the StName output will contain the value in the reference data, like 'Trail West' and 'Avenue South'. For example this address: "31541 Trail West Rd, Sylvia, Kansas, 67581" ...generates a StName value of 'Trail West' using the StreetMap Premium 2016 R3 USA locator. The Standardize Addresses tool doesn't know what is in the reference data, whereas the Geocode Addresses tool does. Back in the day parsing addresses was deterministic (any address had only one interpretation) and Standardize Addresses behaved in a controlled fashion. We could not use that approach globally, so unfortunately you need to use Geocode Addresses to do the srandardization. The World Service will work if you do not have StreetMap, but it will cost credits. Regards
... View more
01-25-2017
09:22 AM
|
0
|
11
|
2265
|
|
POST
|
That tool is looking for the license file, not the GDB. Regards
... View more
01-12-2017
09:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1420
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | a month ago | |
| 4 | 05-28-2026 05:58 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
an hour ago
|