Latest Contributions by RichRuh

Jonathan, VersionManager.CreateHistoricalVersion is used to create a named historical version in an enterprise geodatabase. As you noted, that's not supported with feature services. To connect to an historical moment, create an HistoricalVersion object using VersionManager.GetHistoricalVersion(DateTime), then pass it to ChangeVersion as your code sample above already shows. I hope this helps, --Rich   ... View more

Since the utility network is primarily a services-based system, access to fine-grained topology is not available on the client, which includes the Pro SDK. If the existing analytics framework is not sufficient for your use cases, you can write a custom Server Object Extension using the Enterprise SDK.  This SDK, which runs on the server, provides IForwardStar-like capabilities. I hope this helps answer the question. --Rich ... View more

Antoine, I think you can do everything but the HAVING clause using the table statistics methods described here. --Rich ... View more

I can't speak for the rest of the Pro SDK, but on the geodatabase side, we have the following "big-ticket" issues that we're looking at: New field data types Core linear referencing Versioning conflicts Geodatabase sync Edit changes  ... View more

Unfortunately, there's not yet Pro SDK access to replica information (it's on the roadmap).  @gpnobbir do you know if this can be done with geoprocessing/Python? --Rich ... View more

Hi Helen, Sorry for the delayed response. The only assemblies that work outside of ArcGIS Pro are `ArcGIS.Core.dll` and `ArcGIS.CoreHost.dll`. You can only use ArcGIS.Desktop.Editing if you are building a Pro add-in. You can edit features using the geodatabase routines described here: https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-pro-sdk/wiki/ProConcepts-Geodatabase#editing-in-stand-alone-mode I hope this helps, --Rich ... View more

Helen, The only supported assemblies in CoreHost applications are `ArcGIS.Core.dll` and `ArcGIS.CoreHost.dll`.  More detailed instructions for creating CoreHost applications can be found here. --Rich ... View more

Glad to hear it, Joe. Good luck figuring out the M issues. Take care, --Rich ... View more

Hi Joe, This should be a simple task, and I cannot see anything wrong with the code you have provided.  Do you have access to fiddler? Could you compare the REST request packet between this call and a call to validate generated in Pro (using a similar feature)?  In particular, are the extent coordinates similar?  The only thing I can think of is that the coordinates you are passing in are using a different spatial reference than the utility network... --Rich ... View more

Hi Cory, It was nice to see you in Palm Springs this year. There are no application or editor dependencies for using attribute rules.  They fire automatically whether you're using Pro, JavaScript, Native Maps SDK, or REST. They are fired automatically- no need to change your client code.  I hope this helps! --Rich ... View more

Thanks for the info. I want to add information about attribute rule schema to the Pro SDK at some point, but editing them would probably be farther out. This isn't an ideal solution, but both of these can be accomplished via Python: Schema: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/arcpy/functions/attribute-rule-properties.htm Editing: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/an-overview-of-the-attribute-rules-toolset.htm I don't know about calling the Describe function (for schema information) from Pro, but the tools can be called directly from the Pro SDK using the geoprocessing API. --Rich ... View more

You are correct- there is no current access to attribute rule schema in the Pro SDK. Is there anything in particular that you are looking for? --Rich ... View more

Hi Jens, Thanks for letting me know- that's interesting information. We can take a look and see if this is something we can support in the future. For now, your work-around is probably the best solution. --Rich ... View more

If you can post your editing code fragment here, I can see if anything looks weird, but we haven't seen anything like this before, and you may need to submit this to technical support for further analysis. Sorry I'm not much help. --Rich ... View more