Latest Contributions by FredSpataro

😢🤣 Someone just created an Idea on the issue ... i added your post:   https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-ideas/label-multipoint-features/idi-p/1545614/jump-to/first-unread-message ... View more

Running into a similar issue... but with multi-part polygons.  There's only one label per feature and the if that label location moves off the map frame, there's no label at all and even when that label is on the map it's not clear why certain polygons don't have a label.   Really need to have the option to 'label all parts' ... also the cartographic trick won't help in our custom app b/c we change the label based on user workflow or situation.  Also new features are being actively added so it would be pretty complex to constantly generate single-part label points.    This was also 4 years ago and go no response: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/place-one-label-per-part-on-web-map-or-map-service/td-p/58045   ... View more

Hi @FionaRenton1  Did you ever find a solution to this?  I'm not seeing any option to set in the LabelClass object at 4.30.  Thanks Fred ... View more

Hi @SushilPradhan2  So far not yet, still just clicking refresh when it happens... If you track it down, please post. Thanks! ... View more

Hi,  Thanks for posting back the 'compatibility issue'  update.  It helped me resolve the same error message.  My issue was a tiny bit deeper, I'm including the details here incase it helps anyone else out: Publish enterprise geodatabase layers from Pro 3.1 to Portal/Server 10.9.1 failed with ERROR 001487...  Installed a Pro 2.9 version per this thread, loaded the layers into a map... one of the layers failed to add to the map in this version of Pro with 'Attribute conversion error'... ah hah...  Narrowed it down to a SQLServer 'date' type column in the layer which is a 'geodatabase registered view'.  Oddly the table with the column will load into the map fine and the view will load into map fine if it's NOT registered with the geodatabase, but once you register the view with the geodatabase ... no good. ....That's what I get for trying to follow the rules 🙂    Apparently that column type is supported correctly at 3.x/11.x.  Server 10.9x reported 'couldn't find the layer make sure it exists' but really meant 'can't load the layer b/c of the unsupported data type'  I don't think it's emphasized enough that if you're a 'service publisher', it's an absolute must to maintain the matching version of Pro and Server and you should definitely turn off that auto upgrade popup.  We've been running into constant issues in our publishing workflows b/c someone followed thru on the 'Would you like to upgrade?'.  Even minor updates 3.1 -> 3.3 have caused issues...   Again thanks for posting... this could have been an 'all day headache' if you hadn't ...    ... View more

@JeffBarrette Thanks! Obviously this is not a normal type thing but now that i'm working thru it, I can see a lot of potential uses.  Couple other thoughts: * It would be nice to have a similar method to ConvertLayoutFileToLayout for just the MAPX file.  Seems like this function already does the work since it imports the Layout and Map... why can't I do the same with just the map?  This technique is really useful for server-side geoprocessing services and the pagx/mapx files are easy to handle and keep in source control    * I'm using 3.1.x right now (due to 11.1 at the Portal/Server level) and the .database and .updateDatabases isn't available until 3.2 ... took me a bit to figure out why i kept getting an error on thsoe. * I was able to update the homeFolder, default toolbox, default geodatabase using the specific properties you mentioned. However it leaves references to the original atbx and gdb in the project.  Not a huge deal, someone can clean those open when they first open the project manually or otherwise not a big deal.  The database one probably cleans up when you use the updateDatabases() method but I'm not seeing anything that allow you to remove the toolbox.  removeItem() or a updateToolboxes method is probably needed as well?  ... View more

@Rhys-Donoghue I came up with about the same process... however one thing i'm noticing is that the 'projects home folder' is still mapped to the original 'folder of the blank aprx'.  Did you figure out a way to remap this?  ... View more

Thanks Ben, I've probably worked out that solution as well... i have file level access to the config store so i'm able to open the item json and scrap the ids from there... not totally ideal but slightly faster than an api query and a bit easier to code.  ... View more

Thanks Ben! I was just about to write up the bug in Support. ... View more

I'm seeing the same results ... none of the good result values are being populated according to the doc.  Any chance you reported this as a bug?  ... View more

Thanks for the follow up... looks like someone else created an 'idea' for this: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-an-arcpy-mapping-analyzeforsd-equivalent-to/idc-p/1405280#M29212 but classically not getting thru ...  ... View more

It looks like the old AnalyzeForSD is still there library but is appears to fail opening the APRX ...    from an ArcMap 10.8 install: mapping.py: def AnalyzeForSD(sddraft): """AnalyzeForSD(sddraft) Analyzes Service Definition Draft ( .sddraft ) files to determine suitability and sources of potential performance issues before converting a Service Definition Draft file to a Service Definition ( .sd ) file. sddraft(String): A string that represents the path and file name for the Service Definition Draft ( .sddraft ) file.""" import arcgisscripting return convertArcObjectToPythonObject(arcgisscripting._analyzeForSD(*gp_fixargs([sddraft], True)))   My attempt at running this in Pro... all the imports work and it seems to start reading the sddraft  from arcpy.arcobjects.arcobjectconversion import convertArcObjectToPythonObject import arcgisscripting from arcpy.geoprocessing._base import gp_fixargs sddraft = r"C:\Temp\Map.sddraft" r = convertArcObjectToPythonObject(arcgisscripting._analyzeForSD(*gp_fixargs([sddraft], True)))   Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> ValueError: C:\Temp\Map.aprx ... View more

@ShilpiJain Analyze BEFORE StageService is really needed for copyDataToServer=False.   In my attempts, I've set this property to false, but the StageService copies all of my data to a local geodatabase before i could get the warning about the data source not being registered.  This is unacceptable workflow as it puts an extreme load on the db server that wasn't necessary if it had given us the 'not registered warning' before attempting to pull it across.  I've also run out of disk space, had file too big errors and other things associated with pulling too much data from a db server.  If you're not going to add an 'Analyze' function then StageService tool should immediately quit with errors when copyDataToServer=False.  Just like the UI does.   ... View more