DOC
|
@JakeSkinner I'm running into an issue with the append step where no features are added, leaving the feature service empty. Everything else seems to work, though I did have to note out the same line that @ChrisJRoss13 had trouble with. If I note out the delete steps and check the file GDBs, everything is intact. I can "Publish" from the zipped GDB from the Portal item page and the layer it creates matches and has all of the features. I did double check that the feature service supports appends which was set to true but noticed that it doesn't list a GDB as an accepted type: "supportedAppendFormats": "shapefile,geojson,csv,featureCollection,excel,jsonl" Would this cause the Append step to not add any features?
... View more
03-20-2024
01:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3223
|
POST
|
We experienced this same error after the update as well. Under the settings for the layer that the choice list was pulling from, we had to check off Update under what kind of editing is allowed. It was only set to Add when we first looked and checking off Update and attributes only seemed to fix it. Our layer and survey structure might be different but our survey creates records in a related table which is related to a point layer in the same service. The choice list points to the main point layer.
... View more
02-29-2024
12:39 PM
|
0
|
0
|
405
|
POST
|
I am trying to set up an arcade expression in the layer symbology that will differentiate features with and without attachments. The Count(Attachments($feature)) part works great in a popup attribute expression and returns the necessary values but I am getting an error when trying to use the same code in the symbology expression. It is saying 'Attachments' is not defined. Here's my code: If(Count(Attachments($feature)) > 0) {
// if count is greater than zero there are attachments
return 'Has Attachments'
} else {
// otherwise the feature has been inspected but missing photos
return 'No Attachments'
} The funny part is, if I click run to test, it gives me the correct output but the Done button is grayed out.
... View more
12-29-2023
04:47 AM
|
4
|
2
|
668
|
POST
|
@IsmaelChivite Was there a solution for this? I can't imagine setting up a new flow every time the token expires is the intended workflow.
... View more
11-07-2023
05:28 AM
|
1
|
0
|
538
|
POST
|
Hey not sure if you figured out a solution but I found something that worked for me. I wanted to add my workaround in case anyone else came across this. It uses a nested if to concat a usable string depending on negative or not and single or double digit. I started with a calculate field called {UTC} to pull in the UTC using the calculation: pulldata("@property", 'utcOffset') Then a second field called {UTCoffset} that concats the string: if(${UTC}<0 and ${UTC}>-10, concat("-0",(${UTC}*-1),":00"),if(${UTC}<=-10 or ${UTC}>=10, concat(${UTC},":00"),if(${UTC}>=0 and ${UTC}<10, concat("0",${UTC},":00"),"00:00"))) Then in the report template, I put: ${CreationDate | utcOffset:UTCoffset}
... View more
10-24-2023
01:54 PM
|
1
|
0
|
525
|
POST
|
Do you have to change these values back once done making changes? Is there a downside to leaving them as is to keep the main service schema editable? Can it corrupt anything?
... View more
09-25-2023
07:46 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2535
|
POST
|
@IsmaelChivite Is this still the best way to accomplish the closest feature search? Are there any options for a public survey like the "?distance=" search? Not sure in what order those records are returned or if they could be sorted by distance.
... View more
09-01-2023
11:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
567
|
POST
|
Thank you! I was in the process of editing my post as I just figured that out. I added an extra step to pull the entire JSON first and then parse but will take that out and add the where clause to the @ layer calculations like you did. Keeps it simpler. Thanks again, Tim
... View more
08-15-2023
02:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1166
|
POST
|
Did you end up having any luck with this? Tagging @IsmaelChivite for any pointers with using the search() appearance and using that selection for the pulldata()
... View more
08-15-2023
01:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1173
|
BLOG
|
Hi @IsmaelChivite. Quick question regarding watermarks and annotate functionality. Are there any plans to let the 2 work together? It would be great to automatically apply the watermark but still allow users to annotate as needed. Thanks!
... View more
07-05-2023
02:48 PM
|
2
|
0
|
5092
|
POST
|
I just wanted to follow up if anyone else came across this post. I submitted a help ticket to Make and got a response. Click on your Survey123 module to open it and click the 3 vertical dot button in the top right. There should be a "Refresh form" option. Click OK on the module settings and a bubble should pop up saying Refreshing metadata. The fields should now show up in other modules under feature > attributes.
... View more
12-30-2022
05:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
698
|
POST
|
Did you ever find the answer to this? @IsmaelChivite do you know the best way to do this?
... View more
12-27-2022
12:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
717
|
IDEA
|
It would be helpful to have the option to select either .lpk or .lpkx when sharing a layer package from ArcGIS Pro. Clients and their systems still required the older style .lpk for submissions and deliverables. As our organization transitions to only use ArcGIS Pro, the process of creating .lpk files is the sole use of ArcMap. Having the option to save as an older version similar to Save A Copy to save an older version of an MXD in ArcMap would streamline the process.
... View more
05-10-2022
08:56 AM
|
4
|
1
|
1058
|
IDEA
|
The jr:choice-name function currently returns an error if used in the instance_name field. The instance_name returns blanks if a field that uses the jr:choice-name function in the calculation is used as the instance_name. This functionality would allow the domain label to be used in the instance_name in the Inbox. The post here: Using jr:choice-name... talks about possible workarounds but the functionality hasn't been implemented. @IsmaelChivite @Anonymous User
... View more
03-03-2022
01:40 PM
|
6
|
1
|
865
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 09-08-2020 11:29 AM | |
1 | 09-02-2020 02:43 PM | |
2 | 07-05-2023 02:48 PM | |
4 | 12-29-2023 04:47 AM | |
1 | 11-07-2023 05:28 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|