POST
|
Hi everyone, I am trying to create an advanced view according to this documentation Advanced views , this is my code: {
"layers": [
{
"name": "VistaAvanzada",
"description": "AttributeJoin",
"adminLayerInfo": {
"viewLayerDefinition": {
"table": {
"name": "target",
"sourceServiceName": "TestJoinExpression_Tabla1",
"sourceLayerId": 0,
"sourceLayerFields": [
{
"name": "key1",
"alias": "key1",
"source": "key1"
},
{
"name": "date1",
"alias": "date1",
"source": "date1"
}
],
"relatedTables": [
{
"name": "joined",
"sourceServiceName": "TestJoinExpression_Tabla2",
"sourceLayerId": 0,
"sourceLayerFields": [
{
"name": "key1related",
"alias": "key1related",
"source": "key1related"
},
{
"name": "name",
"alias": "name",
"source": "name"
},
{
"name": "relatedExpression",
"alias": "SumNumsTest",
"expression": "Num1 + Num2",
"type": "esriFieldTypeInteger"
}
],
"type": "INNER",
"parentKeyFields": [
"key1",
"key2"
],
"keyFields": [
"key1related",
"key2related"
]
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
} For this test, I have created the fields Num1 and Num2, in both tables, because I am not sure how the expression works, however the expression field "relatedExpression" is not created, I can see the fields I declared, coming from both tables. That is, the view works for me as a union of tables, but I cannot create the additional field that corresponds to the expression. I appreciate the help
... View more
12-06-2021
06:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
454
|
POST
|
Hello everyone, I'm working on a very complex form of many questions, and I'm trying to make the survey filling out more friendly. I have a select_one question in a repeat, which contains many options. Each option can be checked only once, therefore it would be very useful, if the option marked in the record one, disappears from the list in record two of the repeat, in this way the list is reduced with each record. I have tried some ideas, but still without success, the closest thing to a solution at the moment, is to use many questions select_one, which appear with each record of the repeat, but being so many options is not practical. any idea is welcome, thank you very much. Jeffry J,
... View more
06-09-2021
08:42 AM
|
0
|
1
|
653
|
POST
|
Hi, I have had problems with the new workforce update, I cannot use it since when trying to access the project, it tells me that it cannot be opened, and also that the assignment layer is missing from the map. information: - we create the assignments using forms survey123. - To complete all the important information of the job request, I have created several fields in the project assignment layer, which are completed with the form. -Also, a new table has been created and it has been related to the allocation layer, through API Rest, a clean process, without affecting the integrity of the layer. -In workforce online everything works correctly, the integrations with the worker and controller maps -in classic workforce project followed the same process, and there was no problem. I appreciate all the help provided, this has been a real headache, attached capture of the phone thanks, Jeffry J.
... View more
11-15-2020
11:27 PM
|
0
|
3
|
982
|
BLOG
|
Hi everyone, Ismael Chivite Very excited about this update. I have a scenario where in each entered record, a customer name is selected from a list, and in this way, through a pulldata, other hidden fields such as email, address, telephone number and others are completed. However, when there is a new customer, which is common, it is necessary for the IT department to update the survey options and the pulldata list, and that is not always immediate. So my question is, Is it possible through javascript, that a function consults a feature service in arcgis that is kept updated with the client data? It would be great, since then, I could extract the name from there and all the other customer data. Thanks, Jeffry J.
... View more
09-30-2020
11:08 AM
|
2
|
0
|
48839
|
POST
|
Hello everybody, I need your help to find a possible solution to the following: I have a layer that receives modifications from many users for a single record, because it's used to request and resolve inconsistencies. In that sense, it is necessary to keep a history of the editions on the layer, such as comments, user name, date of edition, among others, such as a change log, to have the traceability of the service and those involved. This will then be displayed in a panel as I show in the attached image. The only solution I found at the moment was to record the history through a related table. So that the user created a new record in the related table every time he did a case update, but that is not fully functional, because there are key fields in the main layer that must be updated to change the case states and cannot be edited from that survey. However, I had to create a survey with the function of only adding new records to the related table, because if the survey edited the main layer, the user could see all the history of the case and edit it. What I need is record the changes automatically in the related table, from the main layer, so that it is transparent to the user, but I can't find a way to increase a record without showing the repeat in the main survey. I really appreciate if you have any solutions or ideas on how I could implement it. Thanks, Jeffry J.
... View more
09-23-2020
03:39 PM
|
0
|
1
|
756
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 09-30-2020 11:08 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
07-17-2023
06:09 PM
|