POST
|
did you ever find a solution to this? I am experiencing into the same error when trying to clone my python environment.
... View more
04-07-2025
02:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
901
|
POST
|
Thanks @MarceloMarques It is very frustrating. And posting dead links that reroute to the trust center does not help.
... View more
03-20-2025
08:01 AM
|
0
|
1
|
941
|
POST
|
The whole reason for my original question was because our IT department installed Sophos and it corrupted our Portal. We had thousands of orphaned SOC processes that would never end and would run the machine out of resources. It also caused issues during upgrades that absolutely rendered the Portal inaccessible. We did have IT implement the white list and still had tons of issues that broke ArcGIS Enterprise. So I cannot get on board with Sophos and ArcGIS Enterprise compatibility claims. We made IT uninstall Sophos and we were able to restore our Portal and start using it again without issues. Now our IT department now wants to force CrowdStrike on us. We are already running it on our workstations and (again, white list exceptions are already in place) we see nothing but issues. Projects locking up and crashing constantly. Simple attribute edits that take minutes to commit. With the issues we have with Pro I am very hesitant to have it installed on our ArcGIS Enterprise servers. I should point out that there are several typos in the white list and we had to navigate to every single folder to get the actual path (not just blindly copying and pasting the bad paths with typos into the exceptions.) I am starting to believe that ESRI just doesn't care about their customers as their software is getting progressively worse over time (not better as one would expect from a company with such a large market). Pro (the most user unfriendly software ever developed) and ArcGIS Enterprise are so bug ridden now that it makes me want to retire early.
... View more
03-19-2025
11:00 AM
|
0
|
3
|
995
|
POST
|
@MarceloMarques- Thank you for the link. I have seen this post in the past but they have updated the link for the ArcGIS Antivirus Guidance document. Are Sophos and CrowdStrike both tested and used in production at ESRI? Do you notice any benefits or downsides from one to the other in comparison? Thanks again, Kathleen
... View more
08-21-2024
08:49 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3125
|
POST
|
@GregoryCarson- Thank you! Was there a reason you switched from CrowdStrike to Cortex? Do you notice any benefits or downsides from one to the other in comparison? Any issues with installation or upgrades? Thanks again! Kathleen
... View more
08-21-2024
08:45 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3127
|
POST
|
@CodyPatterson- Thank you for the information! Did you have to configure all the exceptions as recommended in the ArcGIS Antivirus Guidance From my past experience most anti-virus software is destructive to the ArcGIS Enterprise suite and makes installation/upgrades downright impossible while the software is active. So I am really happy to receive a recommendation from someone with both GIS and IT experience. Thank you again! Kathleen
... View more
08-21-2024
08:20 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3131
|
POST
|
I am looking for a new Antivirus Solution for ArcGIS Enterprise. Let me know what you are using!
... View more
08-21-2024
07:37 AM
|
0
|
16
|
4326
|
POST
|
@Gisbert61 Did you ever find out which anti-virus you had installed? We are currently looking into a new anti-virus solution and apparently, this is one we would want to avoid. Thanks, Kathleen
... View more
08-20-2024
02:08 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1379
|
IDEA
|
@AmirBar-Maor- We currently do not use sub-types for current and historical parcels. We wrote a custom process that exports the current and historical features into separate feature classes and created two separate sets of topology rules. One for all current features and one for all historic features. This process is not ideal because it will only identify the errors which then need to be corrected in the actual fabric and then re-exported and checked again after the data is corrected. If sub-types were built into the parcel fabric data model we would not need to do all these extra custom quality control checks. However, I really do like the idea of allowing SQL queries in the topology rules. That would beneficial in many scenarios.
... View more
06-06-2024
06:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
782
|
IDEA
|
@AmirBar-Maor- Your comment about topology always running on the entire table is not correct. Topology can have different rules for different sub-types. Sub-typing the active and historic parcel types still seems to be the best solution to me.
... View more
06-05-2024
07:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1625
|
POST
|
I did attempt to upgrade the metadata in ArcGIS Pro from the Catalog view. This did not bring in any of the existing FGDC CSDGM metadata. I could see the XML data in SQL Server. Just could not get it to display in Pro.
... View more
03-12-2024
12:45 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2330
|
POST
|
I am working on a python script that pulls the domain and subtype information from a feature class (or table) and uses that information to update the attribute and entity portion of the metadata. We are using the FGDC CSDGM standards. While testing my code I would manually make edits to a test dataset for validation and export the xml files to view the schema changes. In the ArcGIS Pro attribute editor this is found under Resource > Fields > Entity and Attribute Details When I add multiple enumerated domain values to an attribute a validation error pops up “at least one type of attribute domain is required.” And I get a red X on the Fields tab. The xml schema it creates for this attribute looks like this: <attr> <attrlabl>text_field</attrlabl> <attrdef>text field definition</attrdef> <attrdefs>text field definition source</attrdefs> <attrdomv> <edom> <edomv>v1</edomv> <edomvd>value 1</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> <edom> <edomv>v2</edomv> <edomvd>value 2</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> <edom> <edomv>v3</edomv> <edomvd>value 3</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> </attrdomv> There is a single attribute domain value (attrdomv) tag with multiple enumerated domain (edom) tags nested inside of it. When I run this xml through the USGS metadata validation service (https://www1.usgs.gov/mp/) it reports the following error: Error Attribute_Domain_Values (5.1.2.4) permits only one of Enumerated_Domain (5.1.2.4.1) or Range_Domain (5.1.2.4.2) or Codeset_Domain (5.1.2.4.3) or Unrepresentable_Domain (5.1.2.4.4) When I manually alter the schema of the xml file to include multiple attribute domain value (attrdomv) tags each containing a single enumerated domain (edom) tag the error goes away. This is true in both the USGS validator and the built in validator in ArcGIS Pro. <attr> <attrlabl>text_field</attrlabl> <attrdef>text field definition</attrdef> <attrdefs>text field definition source</attrdefs> <attrdomv> <edom> <edomv>v1</edomv> <edomvd>value 1</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> </attrdomv> <attrdomv> <edom> <edomv>v2</edomv> <edomvd>value 2</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> </attrdomv> <attrdomv> <edom> <edomv>v3</edomv> <edomvd>value 3</edomvd> <edomvds>test definition source</edomvds> </edom> </attrdomv> However, the metadata editor now displays strangely for this layer. It is displaying an option to insert a new enumerated domain in between each already established domain. Is this a bug in the metadata editor? I am working with ArcGIS Pro v2.9.6 Lastly, I just want to confirm that the second example is the proper what to do this. Is it correct that each enumerated domain (edom) tag should be nested inside of its own attribute domain value (attrdomv) tag. Thank you, Kathleen
... View more
09-20-2023
10:50 AM
|
2
|
2
|
1368
|
POST
|
We are running Pro 2.9.6 and have entered a domain for every field and still have the error "at least one type of attribute domain is required" also.
... View more
08-10-2023
08:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2294
|
POST
|
We have several feature classes stored in an SDE Enterprise Database that we created metadata for years ago. This metadata is stored in FGDC format. When I view the metadata in ArcCatalog 10.8.2 I am able to see the Summary and Description information that was entered on these feature classes. This is the same information I see in the abstract and purpose tags in the documentation field of the GDB_Items table. However, when I view the metadata in ArcGIS Pro 2.9.6, the Summary and Description are empty. Additionally, when I export the metadata to XML, the abstract and purpose tags are empty. Where does ArcGIS Pro pull the metadata information from? Is it the GDB_Items table? This is not specific to only the Summary and Description, other tags like the publication date, use limitations, etc are all behaving the same way... but Summary and Description are the main ones I am concerned about retrieving. How can I get the metadata that was entered in ArcCatalog years ago to be displayed and exported from Pro? My ArcGIS Pro options are set to view the metadata in FGDC CSDGM Metadata fomat. I have tried to upgrade the metadata and sync it with the data source... but neither of these tools fixed the issue with the metadata not being visible in Pro nor included it in the export to XML.
... View more
06-13-2023
11:45 AM
|
1
|
4
|
2920
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-20-2024 02:08 PM | |
2 | 09-20-2023 10:50 AM | |
1 | 06-13-2023 11:45 AM | |
3 | 01-11-2022 07:33 AM | |
1 | 05-25-2022 10:27 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
08-05-2025
02:47 PM
|