Latest Contributions by JayCary

@Remmert Thanks for the details. A couple of details to verify when importing these types of Reviewer checks into a new geodatabase: Duplicate Feature Verify that the dataset specified in the Features to Compare parameter has a globalID assigned. Verify that the dataset specified in the Features to Compare parameter exists in the geodatabase (and has the same geometry and datum as the input feature class) If using subtype/attribute filters, verify that those subtypes and/or attributes exist in the input feature class. This would also apply if an attribute filter is applied to the dataset specified in the Features to Compare  parameter.   Adjacent Vertex Elevation Change Verify that a vertical coordinate system is defined for the input feature class If using subtype/attribute filters, verify that those subtypes and/or attributes exist in the input feature class. If these are covered, I would suggest a call with technical support to see if they can reproduce the error. ... View more

Hi @Remmert, Can you share the error message you're getting with the Import Attribute Rules GP tool? ... View more

Quick Update: The Valency check is now available in attribute rule-based validation in ArcGIS Pro 3.5 and ArcGIS Enterprise 11.5. The use of the Valency check for interactive data validation using the Run Data Check command is planned for ArcGIS Pro 3.6. ... View more

There are two supported implementation methods (Arcade and ArcGIS Data Reviewer) for validation attribute rules. You may want to review your server log to see which rule(s) are taking the most time to complete. Here is a link to a technical workshop that discusses using server log to identify rule performance. ... View more

Sharing with Attribute rules board for awareness since the observed behavior is the same when using Arcade or Data Reviewer-based validation attribute rules. ... View more

Sharing with Attribute rules board for awareness since the observed behavior is the same when using Arcade or Data Reviewer-based validation attribute rules. ... View more

@Remmertand others who find this idea, please see the following ArcGIS Pro idea requesting similar functionality (grouping is a form of sorting) and add your specific use-case and kudos to show your support: ArcGIS Pro Topology Error Inspector - Sort Headers Note: The Error Inspector supports error management for multiple workflows including Topology rules and Attribute rules (where Data Reviewer error features live). Enhancements to the Error Inspector are typically shared across these workflows. Thanks! ... View more

Hi, Thank you very much for your feedback. Unfortunately, the Reviewer Results pane (and other tools that support ArcMap-based workflows) are scheduled for deprecation in a future release. We recommend that users start transitioning their workflows from Reviewer batch jobs to Data Reviewer automated checks and visual QC tools in attribute rules. You can learn more about migrating to attribute rules in this help topic. ... View more

Hi, Just to confirm, this is the expected behavior when evaluating features using a validation attribute rule. The editor tracking info is updated whether the rule has been implemented using Arcade or a Data Reviewer check. Would it be possible to get more info (either here or in a PM) on how this behavior is impacting the "integrations" you mentioned in your post? Would like to share this with the development team for discussion. Thanks! ... View more