Latest Contributions by JimmyBowden

‎03-19-2025

This would super helpful when working with Z enabled data. Clicking the edit vertices button removes all other features from the selection. Trying to update the Z value on several features is painful.

‎03-19-2025

It would be nice if the Attributes pane could be configured to group attributes so that editors can focus on important data without having to scroll through dozens of fields. Some examples where we would want to move fields are: In a Utility Network there are numerous fields maintained by the network. These are necessary to understand the state of the network but clutter the UI for editors. We have a subset of fields that are required but only for 24" and greater waterlines. Being able to break this out so the editor only has to go to them when necessary is helpful. Some fields are set by an attribute rule but can be changed by the user having these grouped would help the users. We have attempted to use ordering and the alias to help with these situations. I have also tried a custom solution but ran into a bug. If would be better if I didn't have to do custom code. This image shows the full list of attributes the user has to scroll through. Important attributes have to be scrolled to. The next images are from the prototype AddIn I created that show a new tab with subtabs for different groupings (works on a file geodatabase but not feature service) : This was the customization option available to me but these groupings could be configured as a treeview (with a toggle for is expanded or not when initialized):

‎03-19-2025

I contacted tech support and they said it was NOT the same as the bug reported and created a new bug BUG-000175139.

‎03-05-2025

I have created an add-in with an AttributeTabEmbeddableControl, following the instructions at ProConcepts Editing · Esri/arcgis-pro-sdk Wiki · GitHub. The control works as expected on a file geodatabase source (First image) but doesn't work when the layer source is a feature service (Second Image). I have only tested in Pro 3.3.1. Is this expected behavior or is it possible I'm doing something wrong. I have attached the project

‎09-17-2024

When using the Register As Versioned geoprocessing tool it would be nice to include the prerequisites (Globalids, Archiving, Editor Tracking) as options similar to the UI Manage geodatabase functionality as shown below.

‎02-08-2024

There is a UI blocking "Loading locators..." window that frequently popups up when using ArcGIS Pro in version 2.9.8 and 3.2.1 at least. I have several questions: Is this actually loading locators? Is this an incorrect message and ArcGIS Pro is actually doing something else? Why does it need to block the main UI thread? What is the need for ArcGIS Pro to load locators when the locate tool isn't open?

‎12-13-2023

With the release of ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2 the UN extension is no longer available. It has been replaced by the Advanced Editing user type extension. Is this new extension required to run a trace? I don't see any documentation indicating this. @LarryYoung Any update to this idea based on 11.2 licensing changes?

‎09-07-2023

I agree that there's a need to exclude features from validation based on lifecyclestatus. We have similar issues with Approved features. The work around that I came up with was to apply a uniform Z value (-10 for instance) to the abandoned/removed features. This isn't a perfect solution we still had errors to review, but it was preferred to having 1,000s more errors to review. Also note that this may not be a great solution if you desire view your data in 3D.

‎08-28-2023

Over a year ago I posted an Idea to allow read access to branch version data in ArcGIS for AutoCAD. It is currently "under consideration".

‎02-23-2023

@JoseBanuelos Thanks for the update. It is good to know that there is ongoing effort to support subtype layers. This popup is just a simple example of a deficiency of the subtype layer. I look forward to seeing these updates.

‎02-08-2023

@JoseBanuelos Two versions of the api have been released and this still doesn't been fixed. Has there been any progress?

‎02-07-2023

As Mike indicated the Utility Network feature classes are M enabled when they are created. If you are deploying your UN as an enterprise you will want to check the box "Allow geometry updates without m-value" in the Feature properties. This will set the M value to NaN when features are created. At this point you can just ignore them.

‎02-07-2023

If you are using an Enterprise Utility Network ensure that you are connecting to the geodatabase when attempting to make domain changes. Domain changes can only be made when connected to the geodatabase then to see those changes the feature service must be restarted. Some domain changes like to asset type can only be done when topology is disabled. Be aware that changes to asset type will impact your network rules so makes changes with care. Also some fields participate as Network attributes, including operable. Adding a new operable value shouldn't be an issue but will have impacts in some trace situations.

‎10-04-2022

When I run a trace with "Validate Consistency" checked it's possible that the trace will fail because "One or more dirty areas were discovered". The globalids of the features with errors shown in the geoprocessing error report which is helpful. An improvement would be to select these features so the user doesn't have to manually select them.

‎09-19-2022

Thanks @MikeMillerGIS I'm going to try this out and see if it meets our needs.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Tuesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by JimmyBowden

Re: Combine the Edit Vertices tool and the Attribute pane's Geometry tab

Attributes Pane advanced configuration

Re: AttributeTabEmbeddableControl on Feature Service Layer

AttributeTabEmbeddableControl on Feature Service Layer

Register as Versioned

Loading Locators...

Re: Trace should be possible without an UN extension

Re: Remove abandoned features from active UN

Re: Will the UN Data Model work with ArcGIS for AutoCAD - Free Plug-In between AutoCAD & ArcGIS?

Re: Decode Domain

Re: Decode Domain

Re: Do features need to be M-enabled for Utility Network compatibility?

Re: Assigning a different domain to a field

Select features when trace fails with dirty areas

Re: Water Network Subnetwork Issue

Re: Assigning a different domain to a field

Re: AttributeTabEmbeddableControl on Feature Servi...

Attributes Pane advanced configuration

Register as Versioned

Loading Locators...