IDEA
|
Same here, I just got an alert that our "AGO Service Account" used up all its credits. I would love to know who used them all! Luckily, I had only allocated it a limited portion, but I would like to reach out to that user to chat about what they're trying to accomplish and what their best options might be. Right now, all I can go off is who signed in today and has the appropriate permission to do this, but it's still multiple people to go through.
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
POST
|
Is there a way to set the zoom level/scale that results from address locators in ArcGIS Pro appear at when you hit enter after typing them in? Searching for an exact address comes up fine, at 1:729 so I can see the site. Searching for intersections always comes up at 1:10 or so, which is very annoying to have to keep zooming out after each search. I'm trying to save time and effort, so right clicking the results to "pan to" isn't helpful, especially because I'm constantly up and down on the zoom levels so I'm not usually what I now want to be at anyways to see the intersection. I don't want to lock down the scales in my map to certain ones as that would be too limiting in my work.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
95
|
POST
|
@DougBrowning thank you so much for your comment! I've been combing through the field lengths, default values, and calculations for my huge survey without success. "wrong data type" made me think about the attributes I'm pulling from other layers. While the field lengths were fine, a few intersecting polygons had null values and THAT is what was causing this error in my survey. so happy to finally resolve this!
... View more
a month ago
|
1
|
0
|
274
|
POST
|
@mkaburis Yeah, that's the issue I'm running into. We have different enterprise geodatabases for different departments so they have full control over the layers they're the subject matter experts of. Thanks for confirming that it's not supported.
... View more
05-12-2025
06:33 AM
|
1
|
0
|
338
|
POST
|
@Jake_S , @ToddW_stl the view workaround would only work for immediate attribute rules traditionally versioned, right? We have branch versioning set up for the full benefit of attribute rules, which seems incompatible with this workaround as the view would need to be included in the published service to be referenced by the rule, which isn't allowed.
... View more
05-09-2025
01:10 PM
|
0
|
2
|
393
|
POST
|
@ArmstKP Even though we edited the JSON of our webmap to use the ObjectID, it didn't change what it field it says is searchable in the webmap's settings page, though it does work to search by the ObjectID. To make sure you have the correct layer ID string, I would first set another field on that layer to be searchable via the settings page and then just tweak the JSON to say ObjectID instead of that field's name and change the type to esriFieldTypeOid.
... View more
04-10-2025
01:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
311
|
IDEA
|
I believe this is a duplicate of this idea, please upvote!
... View more
04-08-2025
12:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
137
|
IDEA
|
Was just trying to do this with ArcGIS Assistant and was bummed that it's still not possible. This idea would be very helpful for my organization. It will be such a hassle to make new layers and update all the webmaps and apps.
... View more
04-08-2025
12:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
159
|
POST
|
I tried dissolving my roads based on name and a few other fields we use to label. I tried adding in "text-repeat-distance" in the Vector Tile Style Editor's JSON editing (after confirming I was on the right label class by changing the text color). Neither helped. I wouldn't think it's a tile issue as I'm only looking at an 800 ft driveway.
... View more
04-08-2025
11:15 AM
|
0
|
0
|
539
|
POST
|
@ChrisWesson I bumped up the Minimum Interval and republished to ArcGIS Online but I'm still getting the duplicate road labels as seen in my screenshot earlier in this thread.
... View more
04-08-2025
06:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
576
|
IDEA
|
Would definitely use this a lot. Currently have duplicate accounts for testing, but with the move to named user licensing, it would indeed be a "dummy" account if we're paying for two accounts and potentially two Pro licenses for the same Administrator. The testing I need to do is just having a subset of my full permissions for a while, so it's not asking for anything more than the Administrator account would already have. Having another administrator temporarily downgrade us is a hassle. I imagine you'd have to reassign all your items to another user if you went all the way down to Viewer too.
... View more
03-28-2025
08:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
248
|
IDEA
|
I'm worried about the many administrative hassles that moving to named user licenses from concurrent licensing will create, this being one of them. We won't be able to afford having unused licenses sitting around for this sort of situation. I can picture this happening to someone who needs to bump up to a Pro Advanced license with Professional Plus for one project, but there are no more Professional/Standard licenses available for the existing Professional Plus to be bumped down to. Like you said, it would be nice if they could just swap in place.
... View more
03-28-2025
08:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
177
|
IDEA
|
Moving to named user licensing might mean that our departments will need to pay for their own licenses instead of the organization covering all the concurrent licenses. It would be nice if somehow categories in ArcGIS Online/Portal could work with the licenses, so like 6 users have the Parks category and 8 licenses have that category, so we still have 2 Parks seats available. Someone with a different category like Health wouldn't be able to have a Parks license assigned to them.
... View more
03-28-2025
08:17 AM
|
0
|
0
|
130
|
IDEA
|
As I'm working out which user types we'll need after the end of concurrent licensing, I keep running into users who would benefit from a "Publisher" type user that is a Creator without ArcGIS Pro. 1) Lite GIS users who are not willing to learn Pro but are happy to make story maps and simple instant apps in ArcGIS Online. They need more than Mobile Worker because that type cannot create and modify items. 2) Users who need to be in both ArcGIS Online and Portal for ArcGIS to make/manage content for their departments. That necessitates at least a Creator user in both, so a basic license of Pro will be sitting unused. I realize ESRI won't want to change the user types so close to this upcoming transition, but I imagine there are other organizations out there in the same boat.
... View more
03-27-2025
12:47 PM
|
3
|
0
|
207
|
POST
|
Please upvote one of these ideas: - Disabled member accounts still consume a User Type... - Esri Community - AGOL Disabled Account returns Licences - Esri Community
... View more
03-27-2025
12:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
638
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | a month ago | |
1 | 05-12-2025 06:33 AM | |
1 | 08-28-2024 01:09 PM | |
2 | 03-12-2025 07:28 AM | |
1 | 03-10-2025 10:15 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
15 hours ago
|