|
POST
|
If your list of employees is short, you could simply create a select_one choice list. Use their employee ID in the "NAME" field and use their proper name in the "LABEL" field. You might find this easier then going the pulldata() route. Here's a doc that might help: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/survey123/desktop/create-surveys/xlsformessentials.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_63B0F9AA1A05458BB4B86F2A1A05AA78
... View more
01-05-2022
07:35 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2053
|
|
BLOG
|
I too agree with @LeviCecil in feeling “left out to dry”. We built several workflows using Indoor Field Maps specifically for building and safety inspections. These have been actively being done on a daily basis. We had begun building workflows for indoor fire safety inspections when we discovered this change. Had we known this would be changing, we would not have invested so heavily.
... View more
01-04-2022
05:35 PM
|
4
|
0
|
5963
|
|
BLOG
|
As I understand it, as of the the December 2021 release of Field Maps (21.4) you DO in fact need the Indoors Extension. If you are fortunate enough to have an earlier release of Field Maps, it should work. This has been quite a let down for us as we built several workflows for inspections without having the Indoors Extension. Now, they abruptly do not work.
... View more
01-04-2022
08:14 AM
|
2
|
0
|
6062
|
|
POST
|
Do you have a join between your levels and spaces? It sounds like for every space you have a duplicate in your levels dataset.
... View more
12-03-2021
07:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1101
|
|
POST
|
I wonder why you can't have attachments with the same name? Especially if they are attachments for different features. Actually - why couldn't you have attachments for the same feature with the same name? I don't believe it to be an index field.
... View more
11-18-2021
09:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1148
|
|
POST
|
I have a survey where a user can attach one or more photos to a survey using a repeater. One of the requirements is to rename the photo to a name reflective of comments in the survey - i.e. (photo1), (photo2), etc. What I am finding is that you cannot rename an attachment using a name that duplicates any other attachment for that feature class. So, if John Doe submits a survey response ("A") with photo attachments renamed to "Photo1" and "Photo2", Survey response "B" from John Doe or any other user cannot have attachments also called "Photo1" and/or "Photo2". What happens is the Rename Dialog simply will not let you submit the name. Anybody else experience this? Or, know of a workaround?
... View more
11-18-2021
07:16 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1159
|
|
POST
|
I'm running in to the same issues here. Has anyone found either a resolution or a confirmation that this not supported?
... View more
11-16-2021
06:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1496
|
|
POST
|
Hi Mike - after some further testing, it appears that the problem was not a version compatibility issue. The issue turned out to be an issue with both the initial and map's full extent. When creating a TPK using ArcGIS Pro (2.8) there is a GP parameter which let's you specify the extent. For some reason that extent isn't honored or - it's not honored as the TPK's full or initial extent. What I ended up having to was specify the full extent of the map in the data frame properties. that seemed to do the trick. In ArcMap - when you use the GP tool to specify an extent, it honors that extent as both the full and initial extent. Hope that makes sense. It took some trial and error to get this figured out.
... View more
11-09-2021
11:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1750
|
|
POST
|
I have several TPK's that I have created with ArcGIS Pro (2.8). Our vendor has an application which utilizes a very old version of the .NET Runtime (Ver. 10.2.5). We are finding that TPK's created with ArcGIS Pro are NOT Compatible with older (in this case, very older) version of the .NET runtime. Can anyone confirm this?
... View more
10-26-2021
04:50 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1851
|
|
POST
|
I have several TPK's that I have created with ArcGIS Pro (2.8). Our vendor has an application which utilizes a very old version of the .NET Runtime (Ver. 10.2.5). We are finding that TPK's created with ArcGIS Pro are NOT Compatible with older (in this case, very older) version of the .NET runtime. Can anyone confirm this?
... View more
10-25-2021
11:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
519
|
|
POST
|
Hi All, I am trying to use Data Driven Pages to create Tile packages (TPK) instead of outputting to a PDF or JPG. What I am finding that as I iterate through the pages, the TPK's don't honor the definition query set by the Data Driven Page. In my use case, I am iterating through every floor of a building and trying to write out a TPK (instead of PDF) for every floor. Is this possible or can you only export to an image? Here is my Python Script: import arcpy, os, argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Export TPK')
parser.add_argument('-inMXD', help='input map document setup for DDP', required=True)
parser.add_argument('-outFolder', help='output folder name where TPKs will be written', required=True)
args = parser.parse_args()
strOutpath = args.outFolder
mxdPath = args.inMXD
#Test if inMXD exists
if os.path.isfile(mxdPath) and os.access(mxdPath, os.R_OK):
print "input MXD found ( " + mxdPath + ")"
else:
print "Can NOT find input MXD: " + mxdPath
exit()
#Test if outFolder exists
if os.path.exists(strOutpath) and os.access(strOutpath, os.W_OK):
print "Output folder found (" + strOutpath + ")"
else:
print "Can NOT find output DDP folder:" + strOutpath
exit()
mxd = arcpy.mapping.MapDocument(mxdPath)
for pageNum in range(1, mxd.dataDrivenPages.pageCount + 1):
mxd.dataDrivenPages.currentPageID = pageNum
pageorder = mxd.dataDrivenPages.pageRow.FloorID
#Building Value
buildingVal = mxd.dataDrivenPages.pageRow.getValue("BUILDINGNAME")
#Floor Value
floorVal = mxd.dataDrivenPages.pageRow.getValue("FLOOR")
OutputPath = strOutpath + "\\" + buildingVal + "\\" + floorVal
arcpy.env.overwriteOutput = True
arcpy.env.workspace = OutputPath
#Get DataFrame
df = arcpy.mapping.ListDataFrames(mxd)[0]
print("Packing " + OutputPath + ".tpk")
arcpy.CreateMapTilePackage_management(mxdPath, "ONLINE", OutputPath + ".tpk", "PNG8", 24,"","","",df.extent,75,"tpk",0)
del mxd Thanks!
... View more
10-25-2021
11:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
557
|
|
POST
|
Hi all, I'm looking for a way to list several available options and then move them to a collection of selected items. I don't know what the exact term is. I have attached a screen shot to show the UI that I am looking for. Then, when submitted, all the items in the selection list can be stored in a field maybe in comma separated (or pipe) format? What I would like to do is have a list of floors for a building (L1, L2, L3.....L39). and from that list, select the ones that fail inspection and add them to the "selection list". Once selected they would move from the "Available list" to the "Selected" list. When the record is submitted I would get a field with a list of failed floors (comma/pipe delimited) Any thoughts on how to achieve this? 2021-10-01_13-47-09.jpg
... View more
10-01-2021
11:02 AM
|
0
|
1
|
758
|
|
BLOG
|
@Anonymous User - This is great! Integromat integration (webhooks) are proving to be a huge asset to our workflows. Any thoughts on when we might see this available for ArcGIS Enterprise/Portal?
... View more
09-16-2021
10:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6093
|
|
POST
|
Gordon, Thank you for the reply. I will try re-processing with the point density to set to "High" and I will also try increasing the image scale to "1 (Original Size)". There are approximately 1200 images for this project area. The surface is fairly flat with some mixed vegetation. here is a screen shot: Snag_23d0752e.png I tried running the project again last night (before making the adjustments above) and received the following error: Snag_23d20479.png Is there any other information that might be helpful to diagnose this problem?
... View more
08-31-2021
04:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1255
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 07-21-2025 08:17 AM | |
| 1 | 06-06-2025 10:49 AM | |
| 1 | 07-16-2025 09:10 AM | |
| 1 | 07-10-2025 10:47 AM | |
| 2 | 07-21-2025 08:06 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
09-24-2025
09:52 AM
|