|
POST
|
Clint Glover Cross-posting this to Geodatabase where a larger community around the Geometric Network exists. Rebuild is not required to maintain the topological connectivity of the Geometric Network (GN). GN connectivity can be maintained during normal editing operations through attention to the snapping environment you've set up. Whether or not to rebuild depends upon the goal and/or the issues you are seeing. The snapping environment, trace tools and verify network connectivity tools should be sufficient to identify and address connectivity issues you encounter after editing. Verify Connectivity is your friend when issues are encountered. In most cases this can be used in conjunction with manual editing and repair connectivity to identify problems and establish connectivity. Rebuild can be used against small subsets of your GN using the map extent if needed where other tools fail to re-establish connectivity. Rebuild is an intensive process that actually rebuilds the logical network for the area of interest and as such can be expensive. Hope this helps clarify, Jon #godawgs
... View more
01-21-2020
07:28 AM
|
4
|
1
|
1652
|
|
POST
|
Hermien Bijker Based on the items you have already attempted I would suggest reviewing the following topics within the UN Package Tools FAQ. I've shared this with Python for visibility as this is more of a core python issue. I need to install the untools on a machine that is disconnected from the Internet. Can I install the tools? Frequently asked questions—Get Started | ArcGIS Solutions I followed the steps above and still cannot see the untools. What should I do? Frequently asked questions—Get Started | ArcGIS Solutions
... View more
09-19-2019
08:41 AM
|
3
|
0
|
2486
|
|
POST
|
Hi Joshua, A similar question was posed over in ArcGIS Pro which I would recommend checking out. While subtypes aren't a requirement for using contingent values, in the blog, I used the example of speed limit values to illustrate how contingent values could be used to provide additional logic to constrain the available picklist values in the domain by subtype. Contingent values also have the added benefit of providing a level of data validation to ensure errant values aren't entered into the database. Like subtypes, contingent values allow for abstraction at the domain level; however, contingent values take this abstraction much further by restricting the options available within the picklist. Envision a scenario where you have a feature class of city streets categorized using three subtypes for local, collector, and arterial streets. The subtype is valuable to provide one level of abstraction and define different default values for speed limit (such as 25 miles per hour for local streets); however, there is nothing that would prevent an editor from choosing a value other than the default (perhaps setting this to 70 miles per hour). While other values may be technically allowed within the domain, they would be invalid in actual usage for this road type. Applying contingent values in this scenario improves upon the logic to constrain the options available for the subtype’s speed limit and prevent edits such as this from occurring. Additionally, validation is present during data entry to alert the editor to the presence of invalid values, which highlights impacted fields and disables the option to save.
... View more
08-20-2019
01:32 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4076
|
|
POST
|
Hi Michael, Thank you for the feedback. We are all excited about the possibility of leveraging contingent values within Collector and other Runtime clients in a future release. Please add your voice to this Idea to bring support for contingent values to ArcGIS Online.
... View more
08-20-2019
01:21 PM
|
1
|
0
|
4076
|
|
POST
|
Hi Bob, As Marc mentioned above: currently, editing contingent values is only supported in ArcGIS Pro. The Runtime work to support these in other clients such as Collector is planned for a future release.
... View more
08-20-2019
09:34 AM
|
1
|
0
|
4076
|
|
POST
|
Contingent values are currently supported within ArcGIS Pro alone. Please review this related idea to add your vote or voice for this functionality: https://community.esri.com/ideas/16708
... View more
07-20-2019
11:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1948
|
|
POST
|
Bal Atwal Currently, ArcGIS Pro is the only client aware of contingent values and able to consume them. There are plans to expose contingent values through Runtime in a future release which should then pave the way for expanded usage beyond ArcGIS Pro. An Idea has been created with a similar request which you can use to track this capability.
... View more
07-16-2019
01:08 PM
|
2
|
0
|
876
|
|
POST
|
Introduced with ArcGIS Pro 2.3, contingent values provide new capabilities to create dependencies between fields with domains. In a recent blog we discussed a few ways contingent values could help improve your data design and editing workflows. We're curious to know if and how you are using them, and in what ways they've improved your workflows.
... View more
07-16-2019
08:13 AM
|
5
|
17
|
7071
|
|
POST
|
Hi Andrew - From your description of your database config it sounds as though you are using a DBO schema geodatabase and have assigned users to a AD group that has db_datareader/writer assigned along with db_owner. While this will enable your users to have data ownership permissions within the SQL Server geodatabase, they would not be able to perform the role of data owners from within ArcGIS. The information outlined in the link: "User permissions for geodatabases in SQL Server" is correct in that data creators only require 'CREATE TABLE' and 'CREATE PROCEDURE' it also references that "User names for any user accounts that own data must have the same name as their default schema." If using a DBO schema geodatabase, only users, or groups which assign user's sysadmin rights within the SQL Server instance will be able to create data. While the db_owner role does enable elevated permissions within a database it is not synonymous with being a sysadmin (dbo). The following link provide some additional information on the dbo ownership of geodatabase ownership: A comparison of geodatabase owners in SQL Server Adding Windows-authenticated logins or groups to a SQL Server database - Jon
... View more
07-13-2012
10:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
695
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jian - Should this password need to be changed you would need to know the current password but would have the ability to modify the SDE_DBA_PASSWORD as: sdeservice -o modify -r SDE_DBA_PASSWORD -p sde-v newpassword -d ORACLE,SID -i esri_sde Password timeout and the grace period would be controlled via the supporting RDBMS - Jon
... View more
06-07-2012
05:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
510
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jason - Error 000655 is a rather general error; however, when described in conjunction with the text " Parameters are not valid" makes it sound as though the externally run Python script cannot gain access to a spatial database connection or other parameter necessary to complete the synchronization. While you appear to be able to run this within ArcGIS Desktop from your description using ArcCatalog] > [Edit Model] > [Validate] > [Run], can you also simply double-click this model within the toolbox and run it successfully? Would it be possible to provide a copy of the model and or script being used to take a closer look? Have you tried to hard-code the database connection and replica path for the model's replica parameter? - Jon
... View more
06-07-2012
03:51 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2474
|
|
POST
|
Hi Bertrand: Can you provide some additional information on your configuration and the steps you have taken to this point? The (-450) error is stating that the ArcSDE binaries are not compatible with the geodatabase release. The error you are displaying states that the database has not been upgraded and thus the system tables it is looking for (ie. GDB_ITEMS, etc.) are not found. Verify that this geodatabase has in fact been upgraded from 9.3.1 to 10.0 as you stated. Connect to the geodatabase from ArcCatalog using a direct-connection and right-click the connection. Go to "Properties and check the "Upgrade Geodatabase" button for information on the status of the ArcGIS client and ArcSDE geodatabase compatibility. Also, verify that the ArcSDE release that you have installed is consistent with the database version that you have upgraded to. This should be consistent with the ArcGIS client that was used to perform the upgrade. - Jon
... View more
05-15-2012
08:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
439
|
|
POST
|
Nathan, 'sdelayer -o load_only_io' does much the same thing as the arcpy.management.RemoveSpatialIndex(). Either would improve the performance when loading objects as you would not have the index to navigate. Load_only_io goes a bit further than the arcpy function however and places a flag on the feature class metadata that will only enable store and replace I/O operations. In other words, while dropping the spatial index alone will not prevent editing within ArcGIS, setting a feature class to load_only_io will. Hope that helps. - Jon
... View more
05-04-2012
05:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
691
|
|
POST
|
Ligia: Registration of a table as versioned requires an exclusive lock. From your post it would appear as though there are other user's currently connected that are accessing feature classes within the Feature Dataset which puts shared locks on the data and prevents the creation of an exclusive lock. You did not post your configuration so I am not sure if you have access to sde command line to check current connections; however, this may also be done by looking at the 'dbo.sde_process_information' table to identify the user connecting (owner) and the machine from which the connection was issued (nodename). Additionally, if you have the the 'registration_id' for the tables contained within the feature dataset (dbo.sde_table_registry)you can see if any table_locks exist that could be preventing the registration from within (dbo.sde_table_locks). The 'sde_id' for the session and the registration_id corresponding to the table in 'table_locks' will enable you to determine which sessions are connecting to the tables in the Feature Dataset through comparison with the 'process_information' table's 'sde_id' [ATTACH=CONFIG]14071[/ATTACH] FAQ: How are the various lock mechanisms implemented in ArcSDE and the geodatabase?
... View more
05-03-2012
11:49 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1904
|
|
POST
|
anncrystal - OK, so i tested my earlier suggestion including the topology and also see the same issues. While that should work in theory you have to get tricky with how you copy data around. Without the topology this does work. An easier option which I have also tested that DOES work is as follows: 1) Create a one-way replica using the SIMPLE model with all defaults. This will exclude the Topology. 2) On the child geodatabase drag the feature classes outside of the Feature Dataset 3) Delete the Feature Dataset. You will get warnings stating that this Feature Dataset belongs to a replica...continue with deletion. As this is a one way replica there should be no issues yet please note that this is not a usual or documented workflow so please test this extensively before putting something like this into Production. - Jon
... View more
04-04-2012
11:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2561
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-12-2025 01:04 PM | |
| 2 | 06-24-2025 08:00 AM | |
| 1 | 10-14-2024 01:14 PM | |
| 1 | 08-29-2024 09:07 AM | |
| 1 | 06-18-2024 12:48 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
09-05-2025
06:16 AM
|