|
POST
|
@Bud I am not sure what does the contact of yours mean by misfires. Just to be clear ArcGIS Power Automate connectors has nothing to do with webhooks being slow, not triggering or misfires. We are open to investigation if they have reproducible run. I have seen many of our users use the use case you mentioned successfully with our triggers. You can choose to use the methods that works best for you. Like I said, workflow design is crucial when it comes to Power Automate.
... View more
03-19-2026
01:50 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1608
|
|
POST
|
@Bud Thanks for your question. All the triggers related to Features/Attachments created, updated, deleted are server-side triggers. Currently, `when a survey response is submitted` trigger uses client-side approach (which may change in future) that are almost instant. S123 trigger is reliable for the amount of usage they get from all our customers. Yes, it has its shortcomings and issue 5 mentioned above is I think related to having too many fields in the request which Power Automate doesn't like. In the past, we have had issues with server-side webhooks through ArcGIS Online being slow to trigger. Many of our users have previously complained that they didn't run reliably. Some of the issues issues you posted are associated with that, while some of them were related to outages in the Azure and our connector back-end last year. Others in-fact, were related to the webhooks performance. That said, we have worked with ArcGIS Online team and they have resolved the performance issues in the recently released ArcGIS Online version 2026.1. This has internally rehauled the architecture of how the webhooks are triggered reducing previous bottlenecks. From my testing, the current server-side webhooks trigger within1-3 minutes. Please let us know if you experience is otherwise. If this isn't acceptable time frame then there are ways to bypass the webhooks altogether in automation. That would add some overhead creating and maintaining the flows. It may or may not be for everyone. So, can you rely on webhooks 100% of the time? I would say any technological system isn't flawless and there will be bugs and errors. Just because we have self-driving cars doesn't mean we completely let go of the steering; well at least not yet. I would recommend designing smart flows and think about how you can get notified and handle errors if and when they occur. This can include, Sending an email if the `Fetch updates, changes, deletion action` fails or setting up retries on actions if they fail the first time, etc. Lastly, we are here to help and improve, so please keep posting your thoughts, questions and comments. Here is a webhook troubleshooting guide our developer has put together if you wish to narrow down some of the common problems we have seen in the past https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-connectors-for-power-automate-questions/guide-troubleshooting-arcgis-and-arcgis-enterprise/m-p/1634995#M1058
... View more
03-19-2026
08:36 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1647
|
|
BLOG
|
@Bud Thanks for the nudge! The PaaS connector has been release as well so everything relevant is available in the PaaS connector. The article is now updated.
... View more
03-18-2026
07:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
815
|
|
POST
|
@OriGudes230175 Is this something you are looking for: Use the drill through feature—ArcGIS for Power BI | Documentation?
... View more
03-18-2026
07:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
356
|
|
BLOG
|
@SerjStol There aren't any changes from our end to the Survey response is submitted action this release. It could be something changed from S123 side. Does it happen to any Big Integer field? I will confirm if I can reproduce this.
... View more
02-26-2026
12:48 PM
|
0
|
0
|
973
|
|
POST
|
@TimLohnes1 This looks fairly new, I do not see that toggle in my MS tenant and environment. Looks like new connection experience is on horizon. Thanks for this post, hope it will help others.
... View more
02-24-2026
07:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
534
|
|
BLOG
|
Overview The 2026.1 release of ArcGIS for Power Automate brings several significant enhancements and new capabilities to the PaaS connector, expanding integration options and improving user workflows. Below is a summary of the updates introduced in this release. 1. Edit feature layers in the ArcGIS PaaS Connector With advancements in the API key authentication and privileges we are now leveraging these for the first time to allow Feature layer Editing in the PaaS connector. You can now use the new Apply Edits action for this. This action accepts an array of features as input and allows users to add, update, and delete features within a layer. Note that editing attachments is not currently supported, but this is being considered for future updates. This functionality is exclusive to the PaaS Connector now as comparable actions are available in the ArcGIS and Enterprise Connectors. In summary: New Action: Apply Edits (Add, update, delete features) Scope: PaaS Connector Attachments: Editing attachments is not yet supported 2. PaaS Connector can now connect to ArcGIS Enterprise Users can now leverage the ArcGIS PaaS connector to connect to both ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Enterprise and name the connection. The URL parameter is now optional and by default, the connector will connect to ArcGIS Online. When a Portal URL (e.g., yourdomain.com/portal) is specified, you can use an API key generated from ArcGIS Enterprise to create the connection. This update supports more flexible integration scenarios for organizations using ArcGIS Enterprise. API Key authentication has evolved, now offering more granular control over permitted actions. Updates to the PaaS Connector have been made to reflect these improvements, providing enhanced security and flexibility for users. Any results you will experience in the ArcGIS Connectors should follow the privileges model for the API keys. 3. New Action: Get Feature Layer Information A new action, Get Feature Layer Information, has been added. This action retrieves information about feature layers, such as available fields. The fields returned can be used as dynamic content in subsequent actions, streamlining automation and workflows. You no longer have to look at the field names when using actions such as Add or update feature layer (batch) actions or when using apply edits action. In addition to fields data you can also get last modified date which could be helpful in automating flows or getting a date range. Along with field name this should return additional useful information on the layer such as: fieldInfo: Name, type, alias Extent, Spatial reference hasAttachments Editing info: Last Edit date ID standardMaxRecordCount serviceItemId geometryType copyrightText dataFieldsTimeReference description maxRecordCount name templates uniqueIdField serviceUrl etc. Here is a basic example how we can use field names coming from Get Feature layer information to use as an input for Apply Edits action: In a real world scenario you can create an array variable and append all the changes coming from a query and apply all the edits at once. 4. Feature Layer ID Requirement Removed for Fetch updates, changes, deletions action in ArcGIS connector The requirement to specify a Feature Layer ID for the Fetch Updates, Changes, and Deletions action has been removed. Users now only need to select the layer under the Feature layer dropdown, and this alone is sufficient to identify the layer, simplifying the workflow. 5. Documentation We are committed to updating the documentation for ArcGIS connectors so that it is easy for everyone to get started with them. In this release we have added Input Parameters to each action, and we will continue to expand it to include all the parameters. We have also changed the documentation organization which is now collapsed under groups. More updates are coming in 2026.2 release.
... View more
02-20-2026
06:07 AM
|
3
|
7
|
1729
|
|
BLOG
|
@NaginiAmancherla1 The documentation is ahead of the release for the PaaS Connector. We have handed off the 2026.1 release to Microsoft and they have only rolled out ArcGIS and Enterprise connector and not PaaS at the moment. Since we don't know when they will, the documentations usually released week after the final hand off to Microsoft.
... View more
02-19-2026
10:41 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2642
|
|
IDEA
|
@Kristin_Raaen Thanks for submitting this idea, we will look into this.
... View more
02-17-2026
06:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
413
|
|
POST
|
Is editor tracking disabled on your feature layer? Also, I not certain but it might be disabled if you have a FS referencing data from enterprise geodatabase.
... View more
01-22-2026
08:08 AM
|
0
|
1
|
759
|
|
POST
|
@LindseyStone, Try if above works for you. For your question 2, unfortunately that is out of control of ArcGIS Connector. We use Server side webhooks and the flow will start only when the ArcGIS Online FL webhook triggers. We have seen it take longer time to trigger after making the changes. I believe this is under investigation by ArcGIS Online DevOps. "When survey response is submitted" trigger is the only one that is a client-side webhook and triggers almost instantly. You can use this trigger from ArcGIS Connector if that is a better solution and if it works for you. PS. This should not be a problem for ArcGIS Enterprise Connector.
... View more
01-12-2026
11:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1388
|
|
POST
|
That is great to hear that you were able to make it work.
... View more
12-22-2025
10:52 AM
|
1
|
0
|
859
|
|
POST
|
@Joshua-Young We currently don't support `fieldsToCompare` in Fetch updates changes and deletions action but you can use layer queries which might not exactly solve the problem you have but you can only get the changes that matches the filter. There is always an option to use Http Request built in action instead of fetch to send the parameters you need. We do have this enhancement in our backlog.
... View more
12-19-2025
01:15 PM
|
0
|
3
|
969
|
|
POST
|
Noting specific, I think in general using scopes was the highlight for me. I usually dabble into Esri actions and triggers and some automation for our testing but my life isn't dependent on creating automation and how you explained in the post above was really great.
... View more
12-19-2025
12:58 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1878
|
|
POST
|
@EthanV you can use what @abureaux has suggested, I think you may need the latest wkid. Another thing you can do is to use the function (fx) and use the dynamic content within it instead and search for geometry. you should get the topCandidate's geometry. Hope that helps.
... View more
12-19-2025
12:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
705
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 3 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 5 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|