|
POST
|
What's the distance of that offset? Have you just compared the 2 image datasets? Perhaps the referencing on one is a bit off.
... View more
11-17-2016
04:50 AM
|
0
|
7
|
4165
|
|
POST
|
Definitely. The current esri "Pattern" is to leave rasters in whatever format you got them in. Then create a mosaic dataset referencing the original images.
... View more
11-15-2016
11:27 PM
|
1
|
0
|
676
|
|
POST
|
Just wondering if there are in fact 2 point there. And various interpolators deal with coincident data points in different ways. But the most common is to just randomly use 1 of them. You will never know which one.
... View more
11-15-2016
11:15 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2050
|
|
POST
|
Well, if you turn the layer off, all points will dissappear. Try identify, or select, how many records are there?
... View more
11-15-2016
11:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2050
|
|
POST
|
Jose, Just tried this. And I get the same error (using v10.4.1). Perhaps you just can't change the alias of a required field like the Shape_Length or Area.
... View more
11-15-2016
11:09 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2999
|
|
POST
|
Firstly, please format you code correctly. Use the syntax highlighter to format to python. It will make it much easier to read and interpret. You appear to be updating a bunch of text strings. Have you considered using the format syntax? This : row[11] = "(" + row[0] + ") - (" + row[1] + ") - (" + row[2] + ") - (09)" Could become something like : row[11] = "({0}) - ({1}) - ({2}) - (09)".format(row[0], row[1], row[2]) But the whole process looks rather complex. Isn't there a better way. I could not fail to notice that you make reference to OSP in your layer name. Is that OSP Insight, the fibre management db?
... View more
11-15-2016
11:35 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1557
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, I think you have sketched out the correct workflow. There is no auto-magic way of doing this. You still have to reference a series of locations on the scanned map image, with its real world location (your county boundary corners or whatever). It would be difficult to automate because the scanning process could not guarantee the exactly same pixel coordinate for a GCP everytime. (You might have put the map through the scanner at a slightly different angle perhaps etc.)
... View more
11-15-2016
11:24 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2447
|
|
POST
|
Are you sure that there is only one point at that location? Perhaps there are 2 and you are just seeing the one that is "on top". Use the Advanced symbology and symbol order to fix if this is the case.
... View more
11-15-2016
11:19 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2050
|
|
POST
|
Sorry, don't have access to an SDE here to test anything (and definately not on Oracle). There are a few hits from here on Geonet and SE regarding renaming Alias names but am am not sure if they apply in your case.
... View more
11-15-2016
11:15 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2999
|
|
POST
|
Well, the definition of the coordinate system has got nothing to do with the contents of the data itself. They are 2 entirely separate issues. So once you have the coord sys issues sorted, then deal with the content. If you open up the properties page of one of the offending CAD files, look at the details page. Are the layers visible?
... View more
11-15-2016
11:11 AM
|
1
|
3
|
3157
|
|
POST
|
Ah, I see you have already tried that. I suppose you have the correct permissions for your SDE?
... View more
11-15-2016
04:36 AM
|
0
|
6
|
2999
|
|
POST
|
Is there any particular reason you need a specific alias for these required fields? You could run through the tables again using the AlterField tool in the Data Management / Fields toolset.
... View more
11-15-2016
04:34 AM
|
0
|
7
|
2999
|
|
POST
|
And, having though about this for a few minutes... If what you are seeing, when you define this data with one of those "pseudo Lo" projection in the esri software, and it appears upside down, then what you are looking at is normal TM coordinates, not real "Lo" at all. This is the usual mis-labeling of data. Happens a lot. See EE publishers archive from PositionIT Dec 2011, Jan & Feb 2012 for all the details. EE PositionIT
... View more
11-15-2016
03:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3819
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-08-2015 11:28 PM | |
| 1 | 12-20-2013 08:59 PM | |
| 1 | 05-14-2014 10:38 PM | |
| 1 | 12-16-2013 09:05 PM | |
| 1 | 05-31-2019 02:50 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:23 AM
|