Latest Contributions by AyanPalit

@JayLarsen the following come to mind, hope this helps. https://demographics5.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/USA_Traffic_Counts/MapServer https://traffic.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/Traffic/MapServer   ... View more

@EricAkiyoshi Very well laid out pilot study - thanks for sharing with the Esri Community! ... View more

@AlexanderShields_AZ The start (green) and end (stop) graphics to show route editing segments are very much there. What is the ArcGIS versions used? Also the screenshots suggests that centerline does not touch the routes. In this case, the start and end of realign is not auto-detected and could be the reason.  ... View more

@CristinHolmgren2 The deployment of Utility Network to enterprise geodatabase (SDE) requires the Utility Network user type extension. Please ensure that you are signed into Portal and the connected user has the Utility Network user type extension license. Please post your update. ... View more

@Bud I like to consider control points similar to vertices with a special designation. They are stored as geometry attributes and you can convert a control point to a vertex or a vertex to a control point.  Note this is a newer functionality introduced at Pro 3.1. I found the SDK reference here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.1/sdk/api-reference/topic1519.html  ... View more

@gargarcia Thanks for your interest! Most Esri data models started out as a stand-alone schema; the most popular and widely implemented ones evolved into ArcGIS Solutions. Once you find the solution of your interest, the package downloaded from the solution gallery will include documentation, model and other map artifacts. I will let @JimBarry comment on the future roadmap for railroads data model.     ... View more

@JuhaHaanpera Please consider the Gas and Pipeline Referencing Utility Network Foundation that provides more comprehensive modelling and analytical capabilities using ArcGIS Utility Network with an option of ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing. This solution may be used for natural gas, petroleum liquids and hydrogen as well. A good place to start will be reviewing the business requirements and aligning with the most appropriate solution functionality.    ... View more

@-ChrisCraig This Help document steps you through Draw measured hatches along lines Blog: ArcGIS Pro symbology for the Civil 3D objects: working with LYRX files The techniques described can be used to symbolize mile markers for a route.  ... View more

@TravisSmith9 The SDR attribute has come up during data mapping/migration at other organizations as well. Some clients see this as a calculated ratio, that can be derived as and when needed. While others have the need to persist this data, and have added a custom field to Pipelineline feature class.  ... View more

@PeteJordan My guess is the process was developed long time back and  seems high overhead to maintain. Recommend creating an m-aware feature class and using the standard LRS route editing tools to update feature geometry and attributes.  Sorry I don't have a direct answer to your cache issue but think there is a more efficient way to do the same. ... View more

@GraemeBrowning_Aurizon I believe this is unexpected behavior. Recommend to trace back the configuration of the networks and the route loading process.  Conceptually, LRS data model allows you to have multiple LRS networks. After configuration on the LRS networks, you should verify the dLRSNetworks domain. 'The Network ID field is registered with the dLRSNetworks coded value domain when the LRS is created.' After, Append Routes or Create Routes verify the Centerline Sequence table records.  'The combination of the network ID and route ID creates a way of uniquely identifying each route in the LRS. The use of the network ID helps differentiate between LRMs, as route IDs may not be unique across networks.' If you generated Calibration Points, verify the Network ID field as well. If appending Calibration Points, proper Network ID values should be assigned.  'Calibration points are specific to an LRS Network and comprise the measure component of the LRM.' ... View more

Hello @RobertArens Here are my thoughts: Going strictly by the verbiage referenced, no patching would include security patches. So, you may run into the risk of non-compliance with organizational security polices. The retire policy is similar to other technology companies like Microsoft, Oracle, Google.  However, there have been special circumstances where Esri has issued patches due to the extreme nature of the security vulnerability and the wide impact to users (for e.g. log4j). This is more of an exception and not the norm, so suggest not relying on this practice.  Having said that, you can certainly raise the matter with your Esri Account Representative and seek specific guidance. Secondly, you should also raise the concern with the vendor/creator of the ArcMap extensions. Any software maintenance plan on the extensions should have a roadmap for porting to ArcGIS Pro.  You can certainly consider additional support contracts but my advice is that funds are better used towards a future state with ArcGIS Pro based tools versus maintaining legacy tools. ... View more