|
IDEA
|
Related: Include 'Table to Excel' tool in the catalog pane's export options
... View more
08-20-2025
08:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1753
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be great if we could export to Excel directly from the Contents > Data menu. Add a new "Export to Excel" option under "Export Table".
... View more
08-20-2025
08:27 AM
|
10
|
16
|
4595
|
|
IDEA
|
Use Case: Find municipalities that have a riding that extends beyond the municipal boundary/overlaps another municipality. Municipalities: https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/datasets/lio::municipal-boundary-lower-and-single-tier/about Ridings: https://www.elections.on.ca/en/voting-in-ontario/electoral-district-shapefiles.html Hint: Do a negative 500m buffer so that slight overlaps are ignored by geoprocessing tools. Examples: Toronto, Ajax, and Whitby are not examples of municipalities that meet this criteria. But most other municipalities do meet this criteria. The green labels pertain to the municipalities, not the ridings. Idea: A single geoprocessing tool that would output a copy of the Municipalities layer, but would have a column that indicates if any of the overlapping ridings touch any other municipalities. Right now, I am using a multi-step process with multiple spatial joins that is overly complicated.
... View more
08-12-2025
08:03 AM
|
0
|
2
|
639
|
|
IDEA
|
@MargaretCrawford Here's a screenshot of what I'm looking for. I manually created the Join_Count_Per_Group field after the fact to show what I want. Use Case: I want a list of municipalities and the ridings that touch the municipalities. I want one row per riding/municipality combination, hence the one to many join. And I want to only include rows where there is more than one riding per municipality, by creating a definition query: Join_Count_Per_Group > 1. I want to do this using a single geoprocessing tool.
... View more
08-08-2025
11:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1624
|
|
IDEA
|
Edited. I have a municipality FC and a riding FC. The spatial relationship of the data is one-to-many: one municipality intersects many ridings. I want to do a one-to-many spatial join (a row for each intersecting riding), but I want a column in the output that indicates the Join_Count_Per_Group; I want each row to indicate how many ridings there are per municipality. All within a single geoprocessing operation. Currently, with one-to-many spatial joins, the Join_Count field is set to 1 (or zero?) for every row.
... View more
08-08-2025
08:50 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1681
|
|
IDEA
|
An "Intersect Multiple" operation would be handy too. Select By Location — Intersect Multiple
... View more
08-07-2025
11:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
899
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.3 Using Select By Location, I want to select polygons from a FC that intersect multiple polygons in a different FC. I want to use Select By Location for this because it is efficient to use and doesn't output copies of the data.
... View more
08-07-2025
11:50 AM
|
7
|
1
|
530
|
|
IDEA
|
I agree with @SimonSchütte_ct . @TanuHoque I think this idea should be reopened.
... View more
08-04-2025
03:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1024
|
|
IDEA
|
@BobBooth1 Thanks. I tried your suggestion, but the output layer doesn't seem to highlight water at all. If anything, the water is de-emphasized. Not sure why.
... View more
07-16-2025
05:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1043
|
|
IDEA
|
I have a 4-band ortho with near infrared in the fourth band. I've used the fourth band as red. I know from being on site that there is a creek at the yellow line and some standing water at the white line. And I can see it in the ortho, too. Using a raster function, I want to highlight the known waterbodies, as well as other unknown waterbodies, in a bright colour. I've tried using the NDVI raster function, but none of the NDVI options highlight the water. Only the vegetation seems to be pronounced in the output NDVI layers. Can a raster function be added that can highlight water in a bright colour? I can send the .tif ortho file to Esri staff in a private message or email if needed.
... View more
07-15-2025
07:08 PM
|
1
|
4
|
1107
|
|
IDEA
|
I have a parcel polygon layer that I want to always be on top of all other layers. Currently, when I create new layers, they get placed at the top of the Contents pane by default. When creating many layers, it's annoying to have to move the parcel layer to the top each time. Idea: Allow me to pin layers to the top of the Contents pane, kind of like freezing rows in Excel.
... View more
07-15-2025
06:29 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1786
|
|
IDEA
|
This issue also happens when removing a layer. The Contents pane position moves, which is not wanted.
... View more
07-15-2025
09:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
431
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be great to have a full-screen map mode. No panes or toolbars would be visible; the map would take up exactly 100% of the screen. That would be very helpful when reviewing/panning around orthos; I want to see as much of the ortho on my screen as possible. It would also be helpful for taking quick map screenshots; it would allow us to take as big of a screenshot as possible, without fiddling with export tools. Instead of this: ...I want to see this: The keyboard shortcut F11 that is used in browsers could be used in ArcGIS Pro too, for consistency's sake.
... View more
07-14-2025
08:59 PM
|
1
|
2
|
2217
|
|
IDEA
|
I've opened the Go To XY toolbar via the Map ribbon tab. I've done some work in other ribbon toolbars, and now I want to close Go To XY. Intuitively, I'd click somewhere on the Go To XY toolbar to close it, such as right-click the minimize button > close or by clicking an X button. I find myself right-clicking the toolbar in various places, trying to close it, but that doesn't seem possible. It's surprisingly frustrating. Instead of closing the toolbar from the Map ribbon tab by un-clicking the Go To XY ribbon button, which I often forget about, could an option be added to close the Go To XY toolbar directly from the toolbar?
... View more
07-14-2025
06:42 PM
|
3
|
0
|
323
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.5.0 I've added a FGDB raster to my map from the Catalog pane. The raster is large, so it takes over a minute to be added to the map. Pro is unusable while it's thinking in the background. Idea: I don't need to see this layer yet in the map. Let me add it to the map in the "turned off" state so I don't have to wait for it to load. I'm aware I can pause the map. I don't want to pause the whole map, add the layer, turn off the layer, and then reload the whole map again. That's unnecessarily slow.
... View more
07-06-2025
11:58 AM
|
2
|
6
|
1221
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03-20-2026 02:12 PM | |
| 1 | 03-19-2026 11:42 AM | |
| 1 | 06-03-2026 04:02 AM | |
| 1 | 03-18-2026 07:08 PM | |
| 2 | 3 weeks ago |