Latest Contributions by JimmyKroon

Peter MacKenzie‌ - not correct, this is available in the current release of Survey123 - but the standard maps feature is marked as a beta feature within it. ... View more

Thanks! This is a huge help for our field staff. ... View more

The data I normally use is projected in Delaware State plane (meters) so that might be it. Map projection is the same. I’ll have to try changing the map projection and see if that helps. The data is hosted services so I can’t change that easily. - Thanks ... View more

Just checked and the setting the units in the tool does persist within an open ArcGIS Pro session, like you described. However, I'd really like it to stay set when I close and reopen Pro. It would be fine even if it was project specific. I'm using 2.4.3 ... View more

I had already tried that, here are my settings. It isn't affecting the measure tool. ... View more

Thanks for the supporting story. It seems like in most cases one day is a problem, but one hour is a crisis. ... View more

Hi Catie, Can you send a link to the csv you're trying to import. And is the map you're making public? Or can it be. If so a link to that would help too. Jimmy ... View more

I'm not editing SDE databases directly, but many of our workflows edit feature services hosted in AGOL or Portal or connections to remote ArcGIS Server. It could be that the network connection is more of a bottleneck for us than other factors. That might be different if you have on-site SDE servers. Here's the basics Dell Precision 3630 - Dell's retail price for this is about $1600 Intel Xeon E-2224, 4 Core, 8MB Cache, 3.4Ghz, 4.6Ghz Turbo NVIDIA Quadro P620, 2GB, 4 mDP to DP adapter 32GB 4x8GB DDR4 2666MHz UDIMM Non-ECC Memory M.2 512GB PCIe NVMe Class 40 Solid State Drive 1TB SATA Hard Drive ... View more

I have the opposite experience and think this might be due to hardware. I believe a high-performance configuration for ArcMap would be different than for Pro, due to multi-processor support, GPU's etc.  On my pc, Pro opens in seconds and is very fast. ArcMap feels like a bag of bricks in comparison, to the point that a rarely open it. ... View more

Rather than a constraint, I've thought it would work well if the location were null when the form loads. Then the location is not populated until the user sets it. Hopefully, setting the geopoint to required would then force the user to pick a location. Required doesn't work right now because it always loads a default (bad) location. I've seen this cause lots of problems. ... View more

That poll needs a third option - ArcGIS Pro is ready by I am not. I'm in the middle of a project to move all of my programs data processing and map production into Pro. It's taken some re-learning for sure, but now I am at the point where I love working in Pro and lothe opening ArcMap. Pro actually runs much faster on my current PC than ArcMap, probably because it's able to take advantage of the better hardware and 64 bit architecture. It's also reached a point where it has many new features that ArcMap never did. The symbology is better and map navigation experience is more fluid, and I can add summary statistics and formatted tables from related data to map layouts. Overall, I really enjoy working in it. (But to be fair, performance on my old PC was a drag) These maps were created in Pro and everything about them is created dynamically from the geodatabase. All I do is pick the project's ID number. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mByFBDEFDkbvxn7osK2rsEvI_7B_saSf/view?usp=sharing But the other side of this story - I think we have two groups emerging at work. New GIS users who, from day one, work with solutions designed for ArcGIS Pro using feature services, mobile and web tools, etc. They tend to be very happy and I've even heard some say Pro was 'intuitive'. Nobody said that about ArcMap. The other group are 'traditional' ArcMap users who's programs have used GIS for years (decades?). It'll take a lot of time and energy to retrain them in Pro and modify their workflows. They need training and they also need to dedicate time to using Pro and working through the roadblocks they will find. I feel like this group is stuck and really needs a push. They also tend to be confused by Pro because they are expecting it to be laid out like ArcMap, which it isn't. Jimmy ... View more

Here is another writeup I found on real-world Pro hardware.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j0XOrBmsVxsMVVGjM8v90JyV-e8mtmP2/view The easiest and probably least upgrade to your current setup would be more RAM. If it's reading/writing to virtual memory that'll really slow it down and 16gb is on the low end of requirements. After that, consider a better video card. I'd make sure your windows virtual memory/Pro cache locations are local drives (not on a network). I've seen that where someone is having poor performance and Arc a network folder for a cache. Not helping!! Your CPU has 2 physical (4 virtual) cores and that doc recommends more, but not too many people are going to upgrade their processor.  Jimmy ... View more