|
POST
|
Is there an arcade or some other function/process that will allow me to get/save the GlobalID of the current ActiveRecord. It appears that the active record (when you create a new record) is not selected and is only selected when you use the "select record" or "attribute rule showing selected record" in the record menu. For example, if I have a record named "TEST1" and use the "select record" the selection set is "TEST1". However, when I go to manage records and select another recent record "TEST2" and set it the active record the selection set in the records table is still "TEST1" until I use the "Select Records" or "attribute rule showing selected record" in the records menu. I have other feature classes that I want to associate with the current active record (cartographic lines, annotation classes, etc). Ultimately I would like to create an attribute rule that does this but not having that I think I could do it with a workflow task.
... View more
08-11-2021
07:54 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2142
|
|
POST
|
We looked at Parcel Type Admin Boundaries in 2.6 and had some issues. Now that 2.8 is out I am looking at this again. Business Case: Our administrative boundaries are managed by our cartographers (along with taxlots). Our admin boundaries are managed as taxcode areas. Taxcodes have a many-to-many relationship with a variety of taxing districts (fire, school, city, transit, etc.). Over 95% of the time these boundaries are coincident with taxlot boundaries. Changing of taxcode boundaries (annexations of any district) are initiated by a "legal" record of some kind. Every spring our cartographers process these annexations so that they are included in the next tax season valuation (Very simple overview) Pros/Cons: The advantage of the admin only parcel type is the built-in nature of the record. I have built three different sets of custom business flows over the years to track and manage taxcode/district annexations. The parcel fabric record does all that for me (no coding - nice!). I have done a few simple business flow tests and it looks good. Question: Who has implemented (or are their more detailed ESRI examples of) the Parcel Type as an Administrative Boundary? Unfortunately, I have not found a lot of documentation or examples where folks have implemented this (impacts on editing, topology rules, etc). I would like to get some links/contacts to help in my review and testing. I hope it is in some video that I just missed or that some user has some thoughts on this. I will continue to test.
... View more
07-27-2021
08:33 AM
|
3
|
1
|
873
|
|
POST
|
We are learning how to use traverse within the parcel fabric environment and really like that you can measure and use traverse both working at the same time. Unfortunately, measure always has a default units of imperial when we open a project. . We followed the documented method to set the default units in options/units/distance units to set the default units to feet As follows: Unfortunately, the units are still imperial. Are we doing something wrong? It appears that this was a issue some time ago and was fixed but I was not able to find it as a current bug. I have tested this in both 2.8 and 2.6 so feel I must be doing something incorrectly.
... View more
06-17-2021
12:09 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1952
|
|
POST
|
This problem appears to be back in 2.6 and 2.8 ArcPro. The default is ALWAYS imperial. The options--> Units-->Distance Units dos not change the default. I have it set to Feet as the option and the following happens... Am I missing something??
... View more
06-14-2021
09:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4156
|
|
POST
|
It appears I am using the Maplex Label Engine (Option selected below)
... View more
02-22-2021
09:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1425
|
|
POST
|
We manage our dimensions for bearing/distance as annotation. Labels are a great way preview these features and they are easily converted to annotation using the ConvertLabelsToAnnotation tool. I have built a simple script in our edit environment to manage this process and it is working great. However, when we display bearing/distance an option my cartographers often use is to place bearing on top and distance below. I am doing this with Label Class - Position (Regular placement / Allow stacked labels / Centered Straight). My labels are stacked with this Python Code (I assume it would be the similar with Arcade). def FindLabel ( [Direction],[Distance] 😞 beardir = [Direction] + "\n" + [Distance) ] return beardir My issue is, I need to Offset the Direction Above and Distance Below to be farther then the default allows me. The only ways I found to do this is to create two separate label classes and position one above and one below or to insert a second line feed "\n". I like the annotation stacked as the tools in ArcPro to edit stacked annotation work very well and the second line feed creates an offset that is too large. I am hoping that there is a simple option to offset stacked labels above/below the line and I have missed it.
... View more
02-22-2021
06:01 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1478
|
|
POST
|
I am much more familiar with Python so that is good with me.
... View more
02-04-2021
10:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2077
|
|
POST
|
I am starting to develop our label/annotation standards and want to follow a best practice. We will be converting our labels to annotation as part of this process (don't want to go into all the reasons for that here - but it is part of the business process). In the sample from the Parcel Fabric Class the Label Class for Direction uses Arcade. There is a lengthy set of code to convert the direction to a standard looking DMS Bearing (ie. Convert 60.6055555555556 to N60°36'20"E) . However if you use Python you can do the same thing with the expression [Direction]. So why not use Python instead of Arcade for this labeling process. Given all the other rules I need to add it seems that starting simpler is better.
... View more
02-04-2021
09:31 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2091
|
|
IDEA
|
You are correct. That will work for now. But... still think the naming options should be added. Thanks
... View more
02-04-2021
05:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2953
|
|
IDEA
|
Currently the files name option in the Export Layout MapSeries Pane includes only three options as follows: Could we have a new option: Multiple PDF Files (Page Name as File name). We use a field for naming the output file (pdf). Having only a suffix option means we have to delete the layout name after producing (exporting) the layout files.
... View more
02-03-2021
10:24 AM
|
4
|
4
|
2992
|
|
IDEA
|
With Attribute rules (insert/update) you can update a field in annotation from an underlying polygon feature class. But, you can not update a TEXTSTRING. The code below works for updating a different textfield in the annotation feature class (It works fine) but when the field is TextString it does not work. This has been reported as a but but was also requested to make this an enhancement so here it is.
// When creating a anno get map number from mapindex polygon layer var fsMapIndex = FeatureSetByName($datastore,"MapIndex",["MapNumber"]) var fsIntersectMap = Intersects(fsMapIndex,$feature) var MapIndex = first(fsIntersectMap) if (MapIndex == null) return {"errorMessage": "No Map Index Feature Found"} return MapIndex.Mapnumber
This tool would help us to build attribute rules when annotating taxlot/parcelnumber or updating bearing/distances to an annotation feature class. Due to several business requirements, feature linking of the features will not work. In addition, the same business reasons do not allow us to use labeling.
... View more
02-01-2021
08:44 AM
|
1
|
4
|
2005
|
|
POST
|
Did not work as intended. However, my cartographers and my production machine are still at 2.6 so it is not a critical issue at this time. My cartographers will be playing with adjusting the 2.6 layout for map production for sometime to come. Looking forward to the 2.7 patch. Thanks for checking.
... View more
01-11-2021
03:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3145
|
|
POST
|
Did you try a stand alone table? The process works fine for looking at feature classes.
... View more
12-21-2020
10:01 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3320
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 07-09-2025 10:30 AM | |
| 1 | 02-05-2025 06:39 AM | |
| 1 | 06-10-2024 10:15 AM | |
| 1 | 06-10-2024 05:19 AM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2024 11:55 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|