|
POST
|
Hi @Jianxia, sure, here is a public app where using the scroll wheel on a mouse produces a jumpy experience. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/368c6b8ebc164f21877eda6aa3aa4fcf/page/fishing/ Zoom in and out buttons zoom smoothly, however. All is smooth on mobile. So really it's a scroll-wheel thing, I guess. Issue exists in Chrome, Edge, and Firefox. Another issue that may or may not be related... when I hover my list now (same app), it flashes each list item. Sometimes you can see the underlying list markup (e.g. {field_name}). Hovering the list did not used to produce that effect. Thanks!
... View more
06-26-2023
06:22 AM
|
0
|
7
|
4248
|
|
POST
|
Since the most recent update in Experience Builder (June 2023), my maps in experience builder are very jumpy when zooming. The zoom experience was pretty smooth before the update. It also causes the basemap to flash when zooming. The same map zooms smoothly in Map Viewer.
... View more
06-20-2023
05:53 AM
|
2
|
19
|
5945
|
|
IDEA
|
Here to say that not a week goes by that I don't wish for the single click functionality. The workaround doesn't always solve the problem, since it reloads the embedded content each click. Would really love to see an option for this functionality implemented.
... View more
06-02-2023
05:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1640
|
|
IDEA
|
Back here to say that while the labeling can work in some cases, it's tedious compared to what's being suggested, which is to disperse point markers dynamically, for instance with dynamic symbol effects. Please see the Point Displacement renderer in QGIS.
... View more
05-25-2023
06:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2145
|
|
POST
|
I've done a pretty thorough review of the documentation about securing data from public survey123 forms, and I'm left with a question. First, I think this question really only applies to surveys published from Connect, given that the web designer does some view creation for you. For surveys published from Connect that are intended to be public -- is it preferable to attach the survey form to a view, as described in the blog post here by @IsmaelChivite ? OR does modifying the source hosted feature layer's settings to only "Add" editing allowed, and "Editors can't see any features, even those they add" provide security to the data? I've seen this referenced, and indeed it appears to prevent any querying of the hosted feature layer. I want to make sure I'm not missing anything to make sure publicly submitted data can be secured properly. Thanks!
... View more
04-28-2023
12:01 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1092
|
|
POST
|
I see, it's a bummer to have to sacrifice the benefits of the new map viewer popup configuration. I did find a workaround that surprisingly works, though it's a bit of a pain in the neck with a lot of fields. I can use arcade to get the related record and return a field value, and I can choose to display THAT in the Fields List configuration. And it displays in FieldMaps. My field users can see what I need them to see in the popup, even if the configuration is a bit ugly. Edit: accepted my response as Solution just so people can see the work around, but thanks for the info.
... View more
04-11-2023
08:31 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1046
|
|
POST
|
I'm using Enterprise 10.9.1. I configure my popup in Map View (new). I am able to add a Field List to the popup configuration and include fields from a 1:1 relationship. The values appear fine in the popup in the Map Viewer. However, in Field Maps, the fields in that part of the popup are blank. Is this known or expected? Is there a way to make this work in FieldMaps?
... View more
04-11-2023
07:44 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1067
|
|
POST
|
I ran into this issue and found that I was expecting integers, but those entering data were sometimes entering decimals. Those records were not included in FeatureSet because they did not match the esri field type I had specified. After a quick glance, It looks like you might be using decimals in the reddNums field, which you have set to esriFieldTypeInteger. If any values get passed to it that aren't integers, it will exclude those records from the feature set. You may need to change any fields expecting decimal numbers to field type Double of Float.
... View more
02-24-2023
10:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1119
|
|
IDEA
|
Print option for dashboard would be great. Or even just an option for the Map widget would be helpful.
... View more
01-12-2023
08:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3819
|
|
POST
|
@KellyHutchins The filter option (illustrated with second link) would be very helpful. I have a URL parameter right now and the filter option would be ideal because I don't need it to make the selection or add the selection outline and fill, or initiate a popup. Ideally, the response to the URL parameters would be configurable enough to turn some of these things on and off. For example, I may want to make the selection with url parameter and show the popup, but not have the fill (because it covers up the symbology I have set, which is important). This could also be solved by an option to adjust opacity of the selection colors. Or to have the filter and the popup. etc. Edited to add that applying the filter option to multiple layers would be great. Edited again to express support for turning off the popup when the url parameter is applied.
... View more
01-12-2023
08:08 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6865
|
|
BLOG
|
@BernSzukalski @RussRoberts @DavidColey Regarding "After some time in reviewing my maps, layers and various share settings, it appears that the 'Update Sharing' dialog will appear anytime something in the map is not shared at the same level or with the same org groups as the map itself. It's fine - it's just that this is a new behavior I did not see described anywhere in any of the 'What's New' blog articles and so was unexpected (for me anyway)." The problem with this is that it's now asking permission to change publicly shared layers BACKWARDS to organizational (or owner) level when the map is set to that. That hasn't happened before and is confusing. People are used to that warning to bring stuff FORWARD to public when needed. Unfortunately, they are accepting that some layers need to be brought BACKWARD to the org to match their basemap and pulling public layers they are using offline by accident. This is causing our public facing apps to show login screen and disrupting our users. A layer that is already public does not need to be brought BACKWARD to internal.
... View more
11-28-2022
12:56 PM
|
1
|
0
|
764
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-15-2022 05:45 AM | |
| 1 | 07-27-2023 09:10 AM | |
| 2 | 10-17-2024 11:45 AM | |
| 1 | 06-23-2021 08:32 AM | |
| 2 | 06-27-2023 08:19 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
12-11-2024
01:48 PM
|