|
POST
|
What is your "fixed" goal? To delete the records without points? to add geometry to the records without points, so they can be posted on a map, or something else? Regards, Jim
... View more
04-07-2014
05:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
726
|
|
POST
|
Symbol rotation IS indeed available in the Basic level license, regardless of the functionality matrix. Basic license is what I am working with, and I have the ability to rotate symbols based on a field. Something else is impacting the rotation of your data. Regards, Jim
... View more
04-07-2014
05:51 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1234
|
|
POST
|
symbol rotation based on a field is supported in the basic license. I am uncertain what you mean by "arithmetic" - are you calculating the rotation? This may be the issue. Regards, Jim
... View more
04-05-2014
12:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1234
|
|
POST
|
Looking at the Census Tract polygon data, and the spreadsheet from USDA, You should perform a join based on attributes using the FIPS column of the Census Tract data, and the CensusTract column of the spreadsheet. At this point, the spreadsheet data is associated with the polygon data, and can be used for symbology or analysis. Best Regards, Jim
... View more
03-28-2014
01:48 PM
|
0
|
0
|
788
|
|
POST
|
Thanks, Robert. It is helpful to know I have not overlooked the obvious.... Again. Best Regards, Jim
... View more
03-18-2014
11:44 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1389
|
|
POST
|
I am processing @ 5,000 small tables (Info tables). They are the result of an intersect and summary statistics for each element of a polygon grid. I now wish to get all tabular information into a single table. I am using python with an iterator and Append_Management, but it is slow (about 1 hour per 1,000 tables). Is there a better way to accomplish this? All tables have the same schema, only different number of rows(1 to 12). Regards, Jim
... View more
03-18-2014
08:56 AM
|
0
|
5
|
4029
|
|
POST
|
It is possible that there is a problem with the geometry of the polygon layer. Run Data Management Tools >> Features >> Repair Geometry, and see if that eliminates this issue. Best Regards, Jim
... View more
03-12-2014
05:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
537
|
|
POST
|
Apologies for being vague. Perhaps the screenshot will help - I did not change from RGB. I changed the "Display Background Value" entry only. Regards, Jim [ATTACH=CONFIG]31734[/ATTACH]
... View more
02-25-2014
08:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1157
|
|
POST
|
For best results, you should set the extent to clip the rasters as close as possible to the edge of the data, then under the symbology tab for the layer, set the background color (these are RGB) to R = 255 G=255 B=255 and use the color = null (the default). I suggest altering the extent, because it appears there is a black line framing the white border.
... View more
02-25-2014
05:10 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1157
|
|
POST
|
No misunderstanding. I wasn't aware you were working with multiple types. Could you cluster by groves? Otherwise, it seems that you will have to divide by hand and visual interpretation. Or am I missing something that allows you to determine tree type / crown radius in an automated fashion? Regards, Jim
... View more
02-25-2014
04:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
850
|
|
POST
|
Perhaps convert the polygons to raster, with the cellsize set to your normal circle radius. Convert this from raster to points, and you have points inside the polygon representing each tree crown. Best Regards, Jim
... View more
02-24-2014
11:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
850
|
|
POST
|
Kurt, simply turn off the drop shadow under the frame properties. Regards, Jim
... View more
02-20-2014
04:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
464
|
|
POST
|
You are trying to contour 30m data at 2m intervals. This is a bad idea. You are trying to extract data / information that is not there. That said, you could add a field and calculate the length of each line, and then set a definition query that removes lines below a reasonable length. Regards, Jim
... View more
02-20-2014
04:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
570
|
|
POST
|
The reference to a TIN does not make sense, as the output is a raster dataset. Perhaps it is simply an overwrite issue? Are you creating a new raster with the revised data? Regards, Jim
... View more
02-14-2014
03:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
741
|
|
POST
|
Hello Matthew, It sounds as though the union tool may give you what you require. It will merge the polygons while retaining their attributes, so you could symbolize based on the unique attribute combinations (you may need to calculate a column for this). Best Regards, Jim
... View more
02-10-2014
11:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
544
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 07-17-2013 09:53 AM | |
| 1 | 11-12-2013 05:35 AM | |
| 1 | 06-11-2024 05:53 AM | |
| 1 | 06-07-2024 06:22 AM | |
| 1 | 01-17-2020 05:22 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
09-25-2025
05:57 AM
|