|
POST
|
Saeid, please don't post copies of your question in multiple locations. Once you post one, you can share it in other places.
... View more
06-16-2015
02:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
866
|
|
POST
|
Yes, you could create a label expression for your point feature class. In the label properties for the layer, click on the expression button, leave it in the default vbscript, and enter this in the box: [DemField] & "% D" & vbCrLf& [RepField] & "% R" & vbCrLf& [UNAField] & "% UNA" (You will need to change the text in the square brackets to your field names)
... View more
06-16-2015
01:59 PM
|
2
|
6
|
4651
|
|
POST
|
If you just want to merge a few features, you can use merge in the editor toolbar menu. Begin editing your feature class, select the features to be merged, and select merge from the editor toolbar dropdown menu. You can then pick which feature you want other features merged into. In your case it might not matter, but I usually pick the largest features, or the one that has attribute values you want to keep.
... View more
06-16-2015
09:39 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2505
|
|
POST
|
If you don't have 3D analyst, you should take a look at ET Surface (ArcGIS tools add-ons and extensions from ET SpatialTechniques). The unregistered version has some limitations, but it might be enough to get your job done.
... View more
06-16-2015
09:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6050
|
|
POST
|
If you've enabled the 3D analyst extension you can also use the toolbar: In ArcMap, ensure that the layer containing the 3D line features you want to profile is checked as visible in the table of contents. Click the Select Features tool from the Tools toolbar. Click the 3D line feature or features you want to profile. Click the Create Profile Graph button on the 3D Analyst toolbar. The profile graph appears as a floating window on your map. .
... View more
06-16-2015
08:59 AM
|
2
|
2
|
6050
|
|
POST
|
You might try using the Sort tool, perhaps with a spatial sort method. You could then use the FID field, which would be ordered in the new dataset, or add and calculate a field of your own.
... View more
06-16-2015
08:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3379
|
|
POST
|
I don't know what you're trying to say, but I have to assume that these are in fact features. First select by attributes from your villages layer, where District = 1732 (ArcGIS Desktop help; select by attribute), then select by location from your villages within a distance (1km) of your colleges, using the subset selection method (ArcGIS Desktop; select by location).
... View more
06-15-2015
09:18 PM
|
2
|
2
|
3733
|
|
POST
|
I'm not sure where you're getting your formula, but I've been looking for something similar online. It appears that this calculation is more complicated than a simple pH of the soil, as it varies due to soil type, soil buffering ability, relative neutralizing value of the lime applied, exchangeable acidity, residual lime credit, and various other complicated chemical factors. If you could give us a citation or some other reference, maybe we could help you find the calculation you need.
... View more
06-15-2015
09:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1284
|
|
POST
|
You have what for an input? I don't really understand. What form is your data in? Huge data is not very descriptive.
... View more
06-15-2015
08:47 PM
|
0
|
6
|
3733
|
|
POST
|
Yes, I would imagine trees over a certain height, within a certain distance. This would be fairly easy to calculate, Ted, if that's helpful. Let us know.
... View more
06-15-2015
03:27 PM
|
0
|
1
|
4907
|
|
POST
|
Yes, exactly! Another possibility is to buffer the transmission lines, convert the canopy height to polygon, and intersect it with the buffer, or do some zonal statistics along the buffer to get max heights, etc. It really depends on how your client has asked the heights to be delivered, Ted.
... View more
06-15-2015
03:11 PM
|
1
|
3
|
4907
|
|
POST
|
Good point. In a math equation, isn't that just seen as multiplication, as in (7.1)3 = 21.9? What I don't understand, is this equation is just a number isn't it? Why use a complicated expression, for what appears to simply be, if phw < 6.4, result = 21.9. Obviously we are missing something.
... View more
06-15-2015
03:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3218
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 04-15-2015 11:16 AM | |
| 1 | 05-08-2015 09:21 AM | |
| 1 | 06-17-2015 06:53 AM | |
| 1 | 06-16-2015 09:39 AM | |
| 1 | 05-29-2015 10:34 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:24 AM
|