Latest Contributions by RPGIS

I just checked a little while ago and I am testing your method. I have never used this method before but I will give an update when things start to go in the direction that we are striving for. Thank you very much for that needed information. ... View more

Does your method work in a 10.9.1 portal? I am testing it out now to see but we are unfortunately limited until we can upgrade. ... View more

Just to clarify, I can write back to the original service that the survey was generated from without having it simply write to a hosted service when the survey is submitted. When I read through the documentation, I didn't see anywhere where it mentioned writing back to a feature service. I am working use a service published from an sde database. I probably should have clarified that in my question. ... View more

Hi @markovic_m, Try one of the following to see if these could potentially fix your issue. Change the setting to automatically select related records on the related table. Check to see if the data in the related table matches the record in the point layer. If there isn't a match then that could be the reason. Check the message propagation of the relationship class. ... View more

The code above works regardless so long as the data type is numeric. Just FYI. ... View more

Hi @SanchezNuñez, You cannot include a grouping of clauses in a map filter. However, you can set it up so that it looks like the example below. ProjectStatus = Active AND ProjectLocation Includes( *Selected Values)   ... View more

Hi @CASSIEANGERER, Field maps can do calculations on hosted services and Survey123 can do it also for hosted services. Bear in mind that should the service change or the field map or survey gets reconfigured that the calculation may be lost.  ... View more

I am glad you got it working. In addition to your solution I am going to mark the one that I previously posted as well since both answers are technically solutions in terms of formatting but not in terms of the exact use case. I will make note to anyone else who has similar issues and comes across this post. ... View more

We ran into similar issues when trying to utilize views. The workaround we came up with is create a sql job that updates a database table referenced by the attribute rules.  ... View more

Do you have users actively editing and either not closing their sessions or have hanging edits? That can sometimes create locks which may be a reason. Try asking everyone to disconnect and then reconcile and post. ... View more

I didn't think to suspect that at all. You might be right and that could be causing the issue. If there are some attribute rules designed for feature to feature edits in conjunction with multiple users editing then that may be the cause. ... View more

Hi @RavindraSingh, Is the ultimate goal to have it so that you have a 1:1 corresponding updates so that when one associated record is changed then the other matching record is also changed. It might be easier for anyone to help troubleshoot your issue if you provide a clear expectation/outcome you wish to have. Example: I want the associated record with matching attributes in Tables A and B that update one another Table A has [x,y,z] fields and Table B has [a,b,c] fields Fields x and a have 123 as matching attributes and fields y and b have 789 as matching attributes The expected behavior is: When a record in Table A is deleted, the associated attribute in field a of Table B is set to null When field b of Table B is updated and the associated attribute in field y of Table A is populated, populate field b of Table B with the attribute found in field y of Table A You don't have to go into full detail but the more information the better. Sometimes drawing out the logic flow will sometimes help with situations like this. ... View more

This may resolve your issue but it is hard to say without knowing what common attributes exist between the two datasets. var lag = $feature.assetgroup var lat = $feature.assettype var lid = $feature.id var ML = FeatureSetByName($datastore, "Maximo_location") // Check 'ASSETGROUP = 16 AND ASSETTYPE = 0' if (lag == 16 ){ var F = First(Filter(ML, "maximolocationid = AND assetGroup == @lag")) if(TypeOf(l_features) == 'Feature'){ lid = First( l_features ).maximolocationid } } return lid var TblName = $feature.tablename var MaxLocID = $feature.id var ET = $editcontext.edittype var RelTbl = FeatureSetByName($datastore, "ElectricDevice") var l_edits = Null if (TblName == "ElectricDevice") { var T = First(Filter(RelTbl, "maximolocationid = @MaxLocID AND assetGroup = 16")) if( TypeOf(T) == 'Feature' ){ l_edits = [{ "className": l_tablename, "updates": [{ "objectid": T.objectid, "attributes": { "maximolocationid": MaxLocID } }] }] } } // Return edits to apply in ElectricDevice feature class if( ET == 'DELETE' ){ MaxLocID = Null } var V = { 'result' : {'attributes':{ id: MaxLocID } } } if( Count( l_edits ) > 0 ){ V['edit'] = l_edits } return V   ... View more

It seems like, correct me if I am wrong, that you are trying to filter object ids. This isn't recommended at all, specifically since object ids are unique to each record and can be hard to filter by. This could be causing your issue.  ... View more