Latest Contributions by DanPatterson

from FAQ - eBird Science We have transitioned to a new 3 km X 3 km prediction grid in the widely accepted Equal Earth equal area projection. Equal Earth Wall Map - Projection but I can't test either ... View more

and the images ... View more

could be geometry dependent, but I just ran a quick test and clip and pairwise clip return the same results. Interestingly, if you switch the order of the inputs (clip one with 6 vs clip 6 with 1) the outputs were the same but the number of records in the table differed.  clipping 1 with 6 did a dissolve producing a multipart shape, two of the shapes were overlapping and those internal boundaries were dissolved as well.  A quick multipart to singlepart left 5 records reflecting the dissolving of the overlapping clipping boundary. ... View more

have you made a scene layer yet? Make Scene Layer (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation ... View more

it is my signature and state in life 😁 ... View more

I understood your situation, the only workaround posted by esri was as cited in the error report.  Perhaps others have found another one.   ... View more

from a snip of your image, click on 1 then on 2 when the table is open 1 should obviously be inside the polygon 2 may be a hole in the polygon or select the area outside the polygon Which is it? If it is a hole that you want removed, then Eliminate Polygon Part (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation might do the trick for the whole featureclass, with unpredictable results, otherwise you are left with standard editing tools to convert holes to polygons and/or splitting the geometry at a point.   Buffering outward by an amount, then reversing the buffer inward by the same amount is an alternative, but requires several steps, usually fewer than individual edits, but the problem is that the "amount" of the buffer doesn't guarantee that all will be removed. Repair Self Intersection (Topographic Production)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation dumping the parts might be a better option if you want to get rid of the "holes" or revisiting how the geometry was created in the first place ... View more

as you report, the workaround is to use the beta version BUG-000174738 for ArcGIS Survey123 ... View more

It is hard to see what you are trying to show since you are using an outline, I presume Try using a polygon fill symbology so one can see whether the areas are being split into two parts with clockwise order or whether one is being converted into a hole (ccw order). (opening up the table and selecting bits might help figure out what is going on as well ... View more

How are you deleting the file?  operating system or  Delete (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation ... View more

never seen that glitch, which begs the question about whether the data were locally stored in a file gdb (source and output) or whether it entailed other obstacles to its behaviour. ... View more

Erase (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation you seem to be reporting the reverse of.... This tool may generate multipart features in the output even if all inputs are single part. If you don't want multipart features, use the Multipart To Singlepart tool on the output feature class. In any event, it would be wise to check to see if the original file was multipart or singlepart to begin with. You might also want to try to see if this tool produces the same result Pairwise Erase (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation again, on singlepart inputs not multipart. ... View more

What is the problem? If it is shapefile related, converting the shapefile to a featureclass in a file geodatabase might solve it. ... View more

Not used at all, but I couldn't help notice that the tool under the python tab's code examples are all using *.crf as the input data type. Extract Water (Image Analyst)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation is the .SAFE folder an equivalent or are the actual data layers contained within? ... View more