Latest Contributions by BarbaraSchneider2

I could also search the feature class instead of the layer and add the layer's definition query to the SpatialQueryFilter: SpatialQueryFilter spQueryFilter = new SpatialQueryFilter() { WhereClause = featLayer.DefinitionQuery, FilterGeometry = point, SpatialRelationship = SpatialRelationship.Intersects, };‍‍‍‍‍‍ using (RowCursor rowCursor = featLayer.GetFeatureClass().Search(spQueryFilter,false))‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍ ... View more

Hi Rich, this makes sense, thank you. However, the Search method on the feature layer doesn't have a parameter for the recycling option, only the Search method on the feature class. I have to search the feature layer because I take into consideration its definition query. Is there a way to search the feature layer with the recycling option set to false? I guess I just have to use the workaround I've described above. Barbara ... View more

I have the same question as Leslie. I want my dockpane to be closed when the project is opened. I solved this problem by closing the dockpane when ArcGIS Pro is shut down. I use the following code in my module: protected override bool CanUnload() { DockPane dockPane = FrameworkApplication.DockPaneManager.Find(_myDockPaneID); if (dockPane != null) { dockPane.IsVisible = false; } return true; } ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍ ... View more

At the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, we have four full time stereo interpreters that use four stereo interpretation applications running with ArcMap and Erdas Stereo Analyst. In order to migrate our applications to ArcGIS Pro, it is important that creating feature classes, geodatabase domains (including domain values), and geodatabase topology is fast. At the moment it is slow because Geoprocessing Tools are used for each step. In our applications, the interpreters work at a sample plot for about 10 minutes and then go to the next one. Each time a sample plot is opened, the feature classes, geodatabase domains, and geodatabase topology are created from scratch programmatically. This is much less error-prone than using pre-created feature classes. ... View more

Hello Than, I had already tried the solution with the temporary variable, but this doesn't work. I think that I already use the second solution, but I am not sure. Here is my code. There is probably something wrong with it: var items = new ObservableCollection<string>(); _streetItems= new ReadOnlyObservableCollection<string>(items); object lockObject = new object(); BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(_streetItems, lockObject); var codedValuePairs = await GetCodedValuePairsFromDomainAsync(layerName, fieldName); foreach (var keyValuePair in codedValuePairs) { items.Add(keyValuePair.Value); } public static async Task<SortedList<object, string>> GetCodeValuePairsFromDomainAsync(string featLayerName, string fieldName) { Domain domain = await GetDomainByFeatureLayerAsync(featLayerName, fieldName); CodedValueDomain codedValueDomain = (CodedValueDomain)domain; SortedList<object, string> codedValuePairs = await QueuedTask.Run(() => { return codedValueDomain.GetCodedValuePairs(); }); return codedValuePairs; } public static async Task<Domain> GetDomainByFeatureLayerAsync(string featLayerName, string fieldName) { Domain domain = await QueuedTask.Run(() => { var featLayer = LayerUtils.GetFeatureLayerByName(featLayerName); var featClass = featLayer.GetFeatureClass(); var featClassDef = featClass.GetDefinition(); int index = featClassDef.FindField(fieldName); var field = featClassDef.GetFields().ElementAt<Field>(index); return field.GetDomain(); }); return domain; }‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍ I now use a workaround: I get the domain coded value pairs when the project starts and save them in global variables. I populate my combo boxes using these global variables later in the constructor of the ProWindow. This works. Thanks, Barbara ... View more

Narelle, no, the values in my 'codedValuePairs' variable for the second domain are not empty. Yes, the second domain is found successfully. Please see below for the entire code I use. Thanks, Barbara ... View more

Hello Than Aung, thank you for your reply! I already use the MVVM pattern using a ViewModel class. Yes, you are right, adding items to the combo box is not inside the MCT thread, so I removed the following code: lock (lockObject) {    ... } However, I need the following line of code because getting coded value pairs from domain is done inside the MCT thread: BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(_streetItems, lockObject); Otherwise, the combo box remains empty. I still have the problem that I can only fill one combo box with the domain values. The other combo box (whether it is the first or the second) always remains empty. ... View more

Hello Narelle, this was my error, sorry about that. The two feature classes didn't have the same spatial reference. Barbara ... View more