|
POST
|
Where do the configuration store and directories live for the site, on a network share or locally on disk? It would also be helpful to review ArcGIS Server logs (may want to temporarily set to debug level to get full information) for an explanation of why the machine is being removed from the site.
... View more
09-06-2022
07:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1964
|
|
POST
|
If the config-store-connection.xml file exists in ../Server/framework/etc you can simply copy the config-store and directories from the temporary location back into place and restart the ArcGIS Server service. If that file is missing, you may need to grab one from a working deployment and update the contained path to match the site location for this machine.
... View more
08-31-2022
06:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2124
|
|
POST
|
Curious to hear your results as well but here's what I've found in my testing. I was able to reproduce this issue with the latest build by first creating a site for ArcGIS Server, exporting the site, creating a hostname.properties file (with the same FQDN defined as the original machine name) and restarting the service, then attempting to import the exported site. I've created an issue internally for tracking this behavior and I expect preventing the hostname.properties file from being created during an upgrade using PowerShell DSC should be a viable workaround for the time-being. When using the standard PowerShell DSC release branch, the hostname.properties file exists prior to site creation, so doesn't cause the failure condition from what I can tell.
... View more
08-30-2022
10:39 AM
|
0
|
2
|
7475
|
|
POST
|
I'm curious if you've commented-out the related hostname.properties section in the ArcGIS_ServerUpgrade.psm1 file as well: https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-powershell-dsc/blob/master/Modules/ArcGIS/DSCResources/ArcGIS_ServerUpgrade/ArcGIS_ServerUpgrade.psm1#L73-L80 If not, there is an additional indication that the hostname.properties file being added during the upgrade may be at fault, especially in light of your additional testing results.
... View more
08-30-2022
08:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5369
|
|
POST
|
Users with administrative roles are able to see all services for federates sites' in the REST/Services endpoint since they have permission to access all items within the organization as well. Otherwise, lesser-privileged users are verified via the privatePortalURL for permissions to services/folders prior to display of the REST services page.
... View more
08-30-2022
05:10 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1407
|
|
POST
|
Interesting, I'm not sure of the hostname.properties file as the cause just something I wanted to try to rule-out. I will try again with that modification to the module and see if I am able to reproduce it. Is there any evidence of a machine name change (FQDN or IP address) during the upgrade process or following the export/import workflow?
... View more
08-29-2022
10:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5379
|
|
POST
|
Does your account have any administrator privileges assigned as a custom role? I tried to replicate this on an 11.0 site with a built-in user with 'user' role and could not see the service at REST when signing-in as this user.
... View more
08-29-2022
10:32 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1422
|
|
POST
|
@NicolasGIS I deployed a 10.9.1 environment and upgraded to 11.0 with PowerShell DSC and did not reproduce the issue you're describing. In your scenario for the upgrade, did you use PowerShell DSC as well or perform the process manually?
... View more
08-26-2022
06:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5399
|
|
POST
|
Were you using a hostname.properties file at 10.9.1, by chance? Starting to look into this further.
... View more
08-25-2022
06:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5415
|
|
POST
|
Would you mind elaborating on the behavior you observed? When I tested on an ArcGIS Server site (albeit with only a few services published and using copied data to the root directories) I saw slightly increased throughput in my results and didn't experience any stability issues.
... View more
08-17-2022
01:11 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2260
|
|
POST
|
Yes, that order makes perfect sense; in reality steps 1, 2, and 3 in shutdown can be combined as well as 3 and 4 in startup. Otherwise hosted services may take a bit to regain access to the relational data store. In terms of Portal for ArcGIS, you want to make sure you shutdown the standby to avoid failover (if doing things manually) or stagger the restart times between primary and standby if scheduling automatically. This will keep things from becoming split-brained as the machines start-up; primary will be recorded in the HA configuration file so start-up should be consistent when it comes back online.
... View more
08-17-2022
05:58 AM
|
2
|
1
|
9838
|
|
POST
|
I couldn't say there is zero risk associated with it, hence the preferred intro above, but the error reported by Portal is specific to the HA plugin attempting to start the machines in the correct order according to the files in the ../content/items/portal-ha directory. If anyone were publishing to the site or creating content when the file server went down there is a high risk to those items/services being corrupted, but less likely that the entire site would be affected. Since all components expect that their shared directories are always available while running, clean-up from corrupted items/services is a variable process that may require manual intervention that isn't documented.
... View more
08-17-2022
04:46 AM
|
1
|
3
|
9852
|
|
POST
|
Preferably, the dependent machines would be shutdown while restarting the file server (or at least the services stopped for those components), then brought back up after the file server becomes available on the network again. More practically speaking, and as you saw in the restart of Portal for ArcGIS on both machines, restarting following the file server should bring things back to a working state. Another point I would consider is if your shared/backup locations for the ArcGIS Data Store configuration or WebGISDR backups are located on the same file server you wouldn't want to restart it during the automatic/scheduled backup time(s).
... View more
08-16-2022
11:27 AM
|
1
|
5
|
9873
|
|
POST
|
Changing the authentication tier of a federated server site is equivalent to unfederating and the site cannot be easily switched back without unregistering from Portal's Sharing/REST endpoint and re-federating, which comes with its own set of challenges. At this point to revert I would consider what backups you have available of the configuration store for the site prior to changing the authentication tier. That information is contained within the config-store/security/security-config.json file so even a file-based backup would be useful in this case.
... View more
08-15-2022
10:03 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1393
|
|
POST
|
This documentation may help you determine which approach fits best for your organization. The 'join site' method is common for this workflow when downtime can be tolerated, whereas the WebGISDR method involves replicating the deployment to a new machine with certain caveats/requirements. The WebGISDR tool would only work for this if your ArcGIS Server site is federated with the Portal for ArcGIS organization. https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/administer/windows/migration-strategies.htm
... View more
08-10-2022
06:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1658
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 12-28-2020 09:14 AM | |
| 1 | 09-16-2022 05:19 AM | |
| 1 | 05-01-2023 05:23 AM | |
| 1 | 05-07-2021 06:21 AM | |
| 1 | 09-13-2021 05:44 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
12-20-2023
11:01 PM
|